On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
How do you get [print] to print a peachy string?
in the way we (including miller) kind of agreed at LAC2008 the answer
is simple: you don't.
I'd be more worried about what to do when arbitrary atom-type-agnostic
objects keep copies of my atoms a
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Mathieu Bouchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
How do you get [print] to print a peachy string?
in the way we (including miller) kind of agreed at LAC2008 the answer
is simple: you don't.
Perhaps you don't, but I do print my A_LIST atoms right fuck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Mathieu Bouchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>>> It would be great to have people start using this string/blob
>>> functionality, but it needs to be changed so that it'll work
>>> without patching Pd itsel
Quoting Mathieu Bouchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> It would be great to have people start using this string/blob
>> functionality, but it needs to be changed so that it'll work
>> without patching Pd itself. IOhannes outlined this idea, a
