Re: [PD-dev] getting double fixes into extra/

2011-11-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-11-10 16:26, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Even better would be to fix the new build system. One of the reasons I removed extra/ from Pd-extended and made it a separate library is because of the brokenness of the build system.

Re: [PD-dev] getting double fixes into extra/

2011-11-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Nov 10, 2011, at 11:05 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-11-10 16:26, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Even better would be to fix the new build system. One of the reasons I removed extra/ from Pd-extended and made it a separate

Re: [PD-dev] getting double fixes into extra/

2011-11-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-11-10 17:57, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: That is 'make install' doing that, not 'make'. 'make install' is only supposed to install the files, not generate them. indeed. make generated the .d_fat files, and make install copied them to

Re: [PD-dev] getting double fixes into extra/

2011-11-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Nov 10, 2011, at 12:16 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-11-10 17:57, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: That is 'make install' doing that, not 'make'. 'make install' is only supposed to install the files, not generate them. indeed.

Re: [PD-dev] getting double fixes into extra/

2011-11-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-11-10 18:21, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Nov 10, 2011, at 12:16 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-11-10 17:57, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: That is 'make install' doing that,

Re: [PD-dev] some tclpd questions/comments

2011-11-10 Thread mescali...@gmail.com
Il 08/11/2011 04:10, Hans-Christoph Steiner ha scritto: I can imagine that for an full library written with tclpd, there would be shared code between the objects. tcl has a package system for that. (package provide / require) I have another question: with proc+ 0_symbol I seem to get