Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-10 Thread Lucas Cordiviola
On 1/10/2021 6:06 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: From what I understand, the [fluidsynth~] external doesn't make use of this stuff, so there is no point in bloating the library and the number of dependencies unnecessarily. We have and older Windows build system (which is more straight forward and

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 16:40 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > > Em dom., 10 de jan. de 2021 às 13:40, Roman Haefeli < > reduz...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > I sitll compiled fluidsynth so that it has the exact support I > > want, > > not more, not less. Basically, I only want libsndfile

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-10 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
Em dom., 10 de jan. de 2021 às 16:40, Alexandre Torres Porres < por...@gmail.com> escreveu: > does anyone know of good soundfonts that use "aftertouch"? What about with > different banks? > I was able to test channel aftertouch and it works fine. I thought key/polyphonic aftertouch would be

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-10 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
Em dom., 10 de jan. de 2021 às 13:40, Roman Haefeli escreveu: > I sitll compiled fluidsynth so that it has the exact support I want, > not more, not less. Basically, I only want libsndfile support (for > loading SF3-files) and everything else disabled. what's everything else? what are you

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 17:14 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > Since I'm still learning a lot, I wonder > if > this is the way to go or if it's considered hacky to fix things after > the fact? I'd like to hear some expert opinion. Only now, I understand what the localdeps.*.sh scripts do: a similar

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 23:13 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 12:47 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 12:29 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > > Hopefully, we'll be able to create fluid~ that also supports sf3 > > files. > > I got fluidsynth compiled with

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-10 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
Em dom., 10 de jan. de 2021 às 12:48, Roman Haefeli escreveu: > Just to be sure, to old [fluid~] goes to: > https://github.com/porres/pd-fluid > and the new [fluidsynth~] to: https://github.com/porres/pd-fluidsynth yes ___ Pd-dev mailing list

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sat, 2021-01-09 at 14:39 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > What feels sane for me is creating a new object, with a different > name (fluidsynth~) and its own design that is cleaner and doesn't try > to fix this compatibility issues, cause it's just a nightmare with no > simple solution.