On 2006-12-14 01:34:07, Hans-Christoph Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] appears to
have written:
On Dec 13, 2006, at 3:41 AM, Bryan Jurish wrote:
yup, i use a hacked Makefile.am for my pd externals, because the builtin
targets (install, uninstall, dist, clean, etc.) are so darned handy.
still,
In a first step towards making Pd a micro-language, I propose moving
the IEM GUI objects that are embedded in Pd into the extra folder,
compiled as individual files. The only changes needed to make this
happen is to rename and move the relevant g_*.c files to extra,
renaming the setup()
A new and keen developer on the forums has asked - What about text processing
in Pd? to which I replied Pd doesn't do strings.
I tie myself in knots trying string-like operations sometimes :), so I know
its a can of worms, but what are the fundamental limitations surrounding symbol.
How do we
Anything that adds modularity and allows separate
compilation has to be a good thing. It seems
a logical partition to make too, graphical things
should probably have their own space.
2c
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:26:32 -0500
Hans-Christoph Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a first step
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
In a first step towards making Pd a micro-language,
I'd like to distinguish between micro-language and micro-environment. Pd
is already a micro-language in the sense that it has a micro-syntax: a
syntax that is very simple, and that
