- Original Message -
From: IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at
To: pd-dev@iem.at
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: [PD-dev] help patch bug reports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-12-20 15:27, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey Jonathan,
I'm guessing that you're the one filing all the bug reports
about
help patches. I'm wondering what your goal is with filing them.
It seems that you're also committing stuff to the same help
patches?
of course i cannot speak for jonathan, but it seems like the
help-patch edits remove the TODO found in [pd META] - as these
TODOs
are now tracked in the bugreport tickets: moved doc errors from META
subpatch to svn tracker
actually i think having these tickets in the sf-tracker is a good idea.
You are correct. Most of the commits were simply as stated. Some of the
META comments didn't apply anymore so I removed those without adding
to the tracker. Everything added to the tracker should be current help patch
bugs which may be:
* missing example patch
* missing description of the object
* failing to explain what an xlet does
* broken connections
* some or all of the above
Doing this makes the search results with the gui-plugin prettier and
centralizes
all bugs to the tracker.
-Jonathan
That makes sense, just wondering what the idea was.
.hc
___
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
