On 3/18/07, Steffen Leve Poulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi David
>
> I sometimes use constructs like attached patch. Its just a bitmask.
> Quite effektive for eventfiltering, beatcuts and patterncreation.
>
> more xor!
Ah this is interesting - and proof that it's really time I learn
dynamic
Hi Husk,
Download the following list of help patches. They explain how to
dynamically create new objects by sending Pd messages to a patch:
http://www.puredata.info/community/pdwiki/PdInternalMessages
-Mike
husk00 wrote:
> Hola list,
> this is my first post!
> i would like to know if is possib
i found a workaround. if i insert a [pix_rgba] object before
[pix_offset], it will work (doesn't work without your fix, so thanks
a lot for it!). strangely the alpha channel is the first, followed by
red, green, blue, so it's really ARGB not RGBA ...
's fine for me know!
ciao, -sciss-
Am
p.s. [saturate 1( and [saturate 0( _do_ work with [pix_gain], however
not with [pix_offset], so maybe you could just copy the behaviour
from pix_gain directly to pix_offset?
Am 18.03.2007 um 21:54 schrieb Sciss:
> i managed to build GEM from the CVS, but the problem is same as
> before (see
i managed to build GEM from the CVS, but the problem is same as
before (see attached image : the dark blue portion in the top-left
should be 100% white) ... i checked on PPC, there it looks good (also
looks good with the previous GEM version)
ciao, -sciss-
Am 12.03.2007 um 11:15 schrieb IO
ok thanks, no i can launch pd!
Am 18.03.2007 um 21:37 schrieb chris clepper:
> Check that the file GemPixConvertSSE2.cpp in the Base folder is
> being built.
>
> On 3/18/07, Sciss <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:hello,
>
> i got the FTGL source code now, could build it and link GEM, so i've
> got a
Hola list,
this is my first post!
i would like to know if is possible to create a object dinamically (for
example from a list or something like that)?
and looking for it in the list and google but i didn't found anything.
it would be very cool!
thanks
Husk
Check that the file GemPixConvertSSE2.cpp in the Base folder is being built.
On 3/18/07, Sciss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hello,
i got the FTGL source code now, could build it and link GEM, so i've
got a GEM.pd_darwin, and i place it in my Pd-0.39.2-extended-
test7.app/Contents/Resources/extra
hello,
i got the FTGL source code now, could build it and link GEM, so i've
got a GEM.pd_darwin, and i place it in my Pd-0.39.2-extended-
test7.app/Contents/Resources/extra folder (replace previous one). Now
I get this error message when launching PD:
/Applications/Pd-0.39.2-extended-test7/P
Hi David
I sometimes use constructs like attached patch. Its just a bitmask.
Quite effektive for eventfiltering, beatcuts and patterncreation.
more xor!
Interesting that you persue this.
mvh Steffen Leve Poulsen
David Powers skrev:
Hello,
Is it possible to somehow convert back and forth bet
> OK
well then i wont upload it...
its a little bit contradicting, since Frank said..
sourceforege is not for binaries...anyway, i am still waiting for a
response from Hans-Christian, maybe then its solved.
Otherwise i'll send people interested my gmx-mediacenter link
that's the way it is
On 3/18/07, Sciss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ok thanks, no i can launch pd!
Did you mean 'now I can launch pd'?
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi Ico,
I've run into exactly the same problem. Most probably it is the decoding
of the firewire signal that eats the cpu cycles. The dv format (same as
firewire) is compressed into a 29 Mbits/sec stream (see e.g.
http://www.adamwilt.com/DV-FAQ-tech.html#DVformats) that needs to be
unpacked be
Hallo,
Steffen hat gesagt: // Steffen wrote:
> On 18/03/2007, at 13.16, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
> >[dispatcher] makes building those long [route method1 method2 method3]
> >chains behind abstraction inlets a bit easier and also works around
> >the problem of adding methods later on without break
damn, sorry to hear about your lay off. thats never good. but i'm
*very* excited to hear you applied to do pluggo4pd...if you land this
i'd like to try to help you get this done in any way i can, so abuse me
as your beta tester, research aide, etc :)
-josh
Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
> Ok, I appli
[expr~ $v1> $v2] is expecting a vector for the second number, and in
this abstraction it will not be passed from a creation argument. If you
wanted to use a creation argument, just use the [expr~] object by
itself, i.e.:
[expr~ $v1> 2.7]
or whatever. [expr] and [expr~] don't seem to be able to
Hi,
having problems to access puredata.info...
marius.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On 18/03/2007, at 13.16, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> [dispatcher] makes building those long [route method1 method2 method3]
> chains behind abstraction inlets a bit easier and also works around
> the problem of adding methods later on without breaking existing
> connections.
Very neat.
It seams th
maybe the problem is i didn't build GemLibs? there are two folders
Gem and GemLibs, in GemLibs README says i should run makeauxlibs, but
that can't do anything since the sources seem to be missing. http://
gem.iem.at/download.html#GemLibs says i need to separately download
GemLibs for "my pl
Hi Luigi,
> The something is not working here...
>
> the pyext object does not build, yet, on startup there is a "success"-
> message
>
i don't understand at all. Did you try to build the external object,
or are you trying to run a script, or what?
That's much too little info.
greetings,
Thoma
Am 18.03.2007 um 16:33 schrieb Luigi Rensinghoff:
>
> only max files right now on the beta-server, right ?
no, there are pd_darwin files as well, but they are only built and
tested against Python 2.3 which is shipped with OSX.
greetings,
Thomas
--
Thomas Grill
http://g.org
___
Hi Luigi,
everything's fine. The ImportError only says that you don't have the
numarray extension installed. It's not strictly necessary.
greetings, Thomas
Am 18.03.2007 um 15:22 schrieb Luigi Rensinghoff:
>
> Am 28.12.2006 um 14:26 schrieb Thomas Grill:
>
>> Hi Luigi,
>> sending you a py/pyext
On 18/03/2007, at 11.37, Derek Holzer wrote:
> I've had several students on both windows and OS X that had trouble
> with the [>~] object for various reasons. It can be replaced with
> [expr~ $v1 > $v2], which is what the [>~] abstraction uses.
I saw that in the help patch for the abstractio
On 18/03/2007, at 10.21, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> it's actually quite simple: when instantiating a [send] without an
> argument, it gets two inlets. the right one can be used to change the
> sendsymbol. i stumbled across this feature by accident, but it is
> documented in doc/1.manual/x5.htm .
Doh
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Martin Peach wrote:
>> IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>> Martin Peach wrote:
>>>
>>>
>
>
Also if my string patch is applied to pd, you can use [str drip 1 0 1 0
1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1] to output that sequence one at a time. Since the floats
>
> th
ok, then I don't know... I had some problems with python versions,
because I had installed 2.4 and the precompiled pyext was using 2.3, so
I kind of downgraded, but you are compiling your own pyext, so that
should not be the problem.
python is a little bit touchy when you don't pass valid script
The something is not working here...
the pyext object does not build, yet, on startup there is a "success"-
message
Luigi
Am 18.03.2007 um 15:45 schrieb marius schebella:
> hi luigi,
> I had the same question one or two weeks ago. It just means that
> numpy.core.multiarray is not installed
hi luigi,
I had the same question one or two weeks ago. It just means that
numpy.core.multiarray is not installed in your python package. but you
don't need that to run pyext.
marius.
Luigi Rensinghoff wrote:
> Am 28.12.2006 um 14:26 schrieb Thomas Grill:
>
>> Hi Luigi,
>> sending you a py/pyex
Am 28.12.2006 um 14:26 schrieb Thomas Grill:
> Hi Luigi,
> sending you a py/pyext binary for PPC/Intel here directly. I can't
> upload to my webspace due to server problems.
> Hope it works for you.
> all the best,
> Thomas
>
>
>
Hi Thomas
its a while ago that you sent me that file, i didnt
no one? this is getting rather urgent now ... if
anyone can point me to a few-days-old (after the
pix_offset fix) Gem.pd_darwin binary, i'd be very
happy !
thanks , -sciss-
--- Item State <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok, thanks, i unchecked all the missing source files
> (were quite a few more)
Well I just got laid off from my job on Friday, so now I'm thinking
about devoting some time to the summer of code myself. How could I
apply?
~Kyle
On 3/16/07, Kyle Klipowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is interesting news, for sure!
>
> ~Kyle
>
> On 3/16/07, Georg Holzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi,
attached is a small, simple, but very useful helper abstraction:
[dispatcher] makes building those long [route method1 method2 method3]
chains behind abstraction inlets a bit easier and also works around
the problem of adding methods later on without breaking existing
connections.
Ciao
--
F
Hallo,
Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 09:47 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > Maybe you want to rip apart the [singleton] abstraction that's part of
> > [sssad] to automatically create the table-abstractions once and only
> > once per running Pd? it's in
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 09:47 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Maybe you want to rip apart the [singleton] abstraction that's part of
> [sssad] to automatically create the table-abstractions once and only
> once per running Pd? it's in the CVS at
> /abstractions/footils/sssad/_sssad/ and you need thes
Martin Peach wrote:
> IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>> Martin Peach wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Also if my string patch is applied to pd, you can use [str drip 1 0 1 0
>>> 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1] to output that sequence one at a time. Since the floats
then why the hell do you need [str drip]?
Hi Roman,
Roman Haefeli wrote:
> oops, you are right. then i should say: 'it was my plan to use only
> internals'. however, i am sure, that a raw square-wave can be generated
> without [>~]. i'll change that. thanks for notifying me.
I've had several students on both windows and OS X that had tr
Hallo,
Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
> while this topic is coming up again from time to time, i made a little
> set of abstractions, that generate bandlimited standard waveforms using
> table look-up.
Maybe you want to rip apart the [singleton] abstraction that's part of
[sss
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 03:21 +0100, Steffen wrote:
> On 18/03/2007, at 2.24, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
> > i forgot to mention:
> > these abstraction are made in plain pd,
>
> <~ is zexy, isn't it?
oops, you are right. then i should say: 'it was my plan to use only
internals'. however, i am sure, th
38 matches
Mail list logo
