Hi list,
I hope my repeating questions don't annoy anyone. I've sent a similar
question a while back to [pd-ot] but with out response, have been
thinking over it, found no answer so far.
Although I had never concerned it till recently, I've learned that 4
point interpolation may at times
PSPunch a écrit :
The attached example works great.
Going slightly off topic, if I am not mistaken, the rectangle on the top
of the cube is rendered twice as seen in some other cases I've seen in
patches using the dual gemhead technique.
Disabling the [gemhead] by sending it a 0 seems
Hi cyrille
what is the problem with :
[loadbang]
|
[0
Yes, that will work.
For example, [gemwin] starts out disabled and without the window
showing, or say, [metro] being off by default.
It is reasonable that [gemhead] is on by default, but being able to
state in the object itself,
can anyone point out to me a nice pure-pd resonant lowpass filter?
the only lowpass filter i know about is vcf_lp2~ from iemlib, but i can't
use iemlib in the project i'm working on.
so - how do i make a resonant lowpass resonant filter? can i chain two
biquad~s together? or is there some
Damian Stewart wrote:
can anyone point out to me a nice pure-pd resonant lowpass filter?
I made one a while ago, following miller's book, not necessarily nice
but it is a resonant lowpass filter...
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-11/056865.html
Claude
Quoting PSPunch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, that will work.
For example, [gemwin] starts out disabled and without the window
showing, or say, [metro] being off by default.
It is reasonable that [gemhead] is on by default, but being able to
state in the object itself, self concluding, that it is
Damian Stewart wrote:
can anyone point out to me a nice pure-pd resonant lowpass filter?
the only lowpass filter i know about is vcf_lp2~ from iemlib, but i can't
use iemlib in the project i'm working on.
so - how do i make a resonant lowpass resonant filter? can i chain two
biquad~s
Hallo,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hat gesagt: // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
however, since i am currently planning to replace [gemhead] with an
abstraction, which would allow you define the behaviour as you like
it, i don't want to add complexity to the current implementation.
don't know when this
Frank Barknecht a écrit :
Hallo,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hat gesagt: // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
however, since i am currently planning to replace [gemhead] with an
abstraction, which would allow you define the behaviour as you like
it, i don't want to add complexity to the current
hi
where can i find it? though it shouldn't, the version on tim blechmann's
member page (http://puredata.info/Members/timblech/loopool63/view) is
still 64.
thx
mik
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
Hallo,
cyrille henry hat gesagt: // cyrille henry wrote:
the best would be not to use the double gemhead trick, but the repeat (or
until) trick instead : it's faster, and don't have this problem, so i think
it's easier to understand.
Yes: Everyone is on the latest Gem should use gemlist
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 15:08 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
Anton Hörnquist wrote:
In my view jon~ is open source so feel free to use it in any way. I'm
not sure how to... well.. document this. What's the best and simplest
way? Should I write something about it in the help patch? What license
Jack a écrit :
We are talking about [gemlist].
Is there a difference with [any] ?
gemlist is a gem object, that work only with gem data
any is an (iem) external that work with any data.
you can replace gemlist with any in your patch, but gemlist should work
without any dependency (except
OK, thank you for the precisions.
++
Jack
Le 25 août 08 à 19:32, cyrille henry a écrit :
Jack a écrit :
We are talking about [gemlist].
Is there a difference with [any] ?
gemlist is a gem object, that work only with gem data
any is an (iem) external that work with any data.
you can
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:48 AM, PSPunch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i.e., having a table of [-1 1 1 -1], an index of 1.5 will return 1.25
with [tabread4]
This is correct. The interpolated values can exceed the values in the
samples. Think about drawing a polynomial through your points, and
Damian Stewart wrote:
to answer my own question:
use [biquad~] with coefficients taken from the [lowpass] external.
i while ago i have tried to build a resonant lp with biquad~, but had
problems with clicks, when the coefficient were changed (even with quite
slow changes). only very slow
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Steffen Juul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13/08/2008, at 9.27, Luke Iannini wrote:
I think we should adopt - for spaces, since it's the most prevalent
style I've encountered.
I personal don't care if it's dash or underscore or camelCase.
And, I think
I've used the Csound opcode Moogladder (based on an algorithm by Antti
Huovilainen) in Pd using csoundapi~. It uses a lot of cpu cycles but
it sounds really good. The csoundapi~ external is useful but it only
allows one instance per patch on windows so ideally I would like to
have this opcode as a
Anton Hörnquist wrote:
I've used the Csound opcode Moogladder (based on an algorithm by Antti
Huovilainen) in Pd using csoundapi~. It uses a lot of cpu cycles but
it sounds really good. The csoundapi~ external is useful but it only
allows one instance per patch on windows so ideally I would
Hallo,
Martin Peach hat gesagt: // Martin Peach wrote:
Anton H?rnquist wrote:
I've used the Csound opcode Moogladder (based on an algorithm by Antti
Huovilainen) in Pd using csoundapi~. It uses a lot of cpu cycles but
it sounds really good. The csoundapi~ external is useful but it only
hi,
pdmtl is compatible with the last release of pd-extended (0.40.3). only
xsample / py (flext stuff) are not included in pd-extended. the sad
thing is that people need to edit the lib to load tof and iemmatrix. i
don't know why tof and iemmatrix are not in the list of loaded libs... hans?
Frank Barknecht wrote:
I think, it may also be possible to implement it as a pure Pd
abstraction with some stacked [rpole~]s and fine tuning, as from a quick
look it seems to be just a bunch of first order filters with
tanh()-distorted filter coefficients. But quick looks may be
deceiving
Thanks all for the ideas.
I thought the dgemhead and repeat methods were just a matter of
preference. If one is trendy and the other out dated, I guess I can just
drop the one said to be less efficient.
--
David Shimamoto
___
Pd-list@iem.at
PSPunch wrote:
I thought the dgemhead and repeat methods were just a matter of
preference. If one is trendy and the other out dated, I guess I can just
drop the one said to be less efficient.
as far as I understand it, there are now 3 methods:
1: double [gemhead]
2: [repeat]
3: [until] with
Hi Charles,
Common practices, not sure. But I think we can establish an upper
bound on the peak value, analytically.
Ok,
So to be secure, [* 0.8] (1/1.25) will prevent such clips I guess.
As the series being somewhat are, perhaps for wavetable synthesis, I
guess a larger factor or a
Quoting Jamie Bullock [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 09:54 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
Hi Jamie
It's not much but might be helpful to port other stuff to purepd.
you'll find
gt~.pd (~)
lt~.pd (~)
sgn~.pd
http://www.netpd.org/eni/purepd/
That's great actually, and I'd love to
Hi, I want to find the max values of a table what is the result of a fft.
I tried using a counter and comparing manually, but it take too long, and
I need to do it as fast as possible, without compromising audio processing.
Do you know if there is some external what I can use to do that?
I just
27 matches
Mail list logo
