Hallo,
Georg Werner hat gesagt: // Georg Werner wrote:
i mean message boxes. i think there is the misunderstanding. you dont
send $1 as a message, too. not as message nor creation argument.
its an expanded string inside an object or when it leaves a messagebox.
$0 is just an abstraction
Hallo,
Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
Other thing i was thinking is that sometimes im using one saddd
abstraction for hold 3 variables as in the case of
colorglobal_background: 1 0 0.305085 Is this a good practice ? or
is it better to use one sssad object for each
Hallo,
Geoff hat gesagt: // Geoff wrote:
Just a few things I need to clarify
The frequency of the phasor is determined by the slope of the line,
by the phase
increment k.
If y=mx +k and wrapping this produces an oscillator, I understand
that adding k can be the phase increment
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 10:05:31PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Feb 8, 2009, at 9:29 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, y wrote:
I'm against adding a general escape mechanism, because I think it's
better to find a design that obviate teh need for it...
see
Quoting Georg Werner ge...@fricklr.de:
Hi,
i mean message boxes. i think there is the misunderstanding. you dont
send $1 as a message, too. not as message nor creation argument.
ok.
i am only trying to explain why it is like it is without resorting to
implementation-issues, but instead
Quoting Frank Barknecht f...@footils.org:
Hallo Pun,
punchik punchik hat gesagt: // punchik punchik wrote:
Now you would of course never patch something like this directly, but it
may be that hidden sends inside of GUI objects are used like this.
the iemguis are usually protected
Hallo,
zmoel...@iem.at hat gesagt: // zmoel...@iem.at wrote:
Quoting Frank Barknecht f...@footils.org:
Hallo Pun,
punchik punchik hat gesagt: // punchik punchik wrote:
Now you would of course never patch something like this directly, but it
may be that hidden sends inside of GUI
hi,
Frank Barknecht:
How about making $0 in messages be a message counter?
if somebody really needs that - i dont ;)
ok, i give up. i think we are on a rather philosophical point now.
but i had a lot of times when students where asking why they have to
write [f $0]-[foobar $1( instead of
Quoting Georg Werner ge...@fricklr.de:
hi,
Frank Barknecht:
How about making $0 in messages be a message counter?
if somebody really needs that - i dont ;)
ok, i give up. i think we are on a rather philosophical point now.
yes, that's m point
but i had a lot of times when students
No that doesnt mean anything, i just threw away some garbage lying
around.
Actually the patch does not work in that version
Am 09.02.2009 um 04:13 schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
Ok, I get that too. First thing I notice is that some connections are
failing. It looks like perhaps
Hey Ben,
I have actually started being interested in this. I have not done any
work yet nor extensive research but there seem to be libgphoto2
bindings for python (I do a bit of python scripting in pd already for
the same project). So, if there's nothing yet available and you don't
mind
Hi
Apologies for the slowness of my reply. Thanks both for the
examples. I couldn't get pix_background working Ben but it seems to
be not what I'm looking for on this occasion anyway. Mark, managed
to see yours working, yep its pretty raw but it's a start which is
what I needed. Many
[f $0]-[message $1( is conceptually different from [message $0( for
the same reason that [f $2]-[message $1( is conceptually different
from [message $2( (and would be, even if $0 had any meaning in a
message box). When I teach I always start with dollar-sign expansion
in message-boxes, since
I think it would make sense (both pedagogically and practically) if $0 in
message boxes actually _did_ something. Incrementing per message box would be
one option, but expanding to a user-defined symbol or float could be very
useful:
[loadbang]
|
[f $0]
|
[; set $0(
That way, message box $0
Oops, I screwed up that ascii art patch. It should be more like this:
[loadbang]
|
[f $0]
|
[; set dollarzero $1(
-Jonathan
--- On Mon, 2/9/09, Matt Barber brbrof...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Matt Barber brbrof...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PD] here I go again..dynamic abstractions
To: PD-List
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote:
I think it would make sense (both pedagogically and practically) if $0 in
message boxes actually _did_ something. Incrementing per message box would
be one option, but expanding to a user-defined symbol or float could
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you have any examples of full-fledged languages that don't have an
escaping mechanism?
I used to make rather large programmes using QuickBASIC, which had
doublequote-delimited strings in which you could have spaces, but newlines
had to be
This has been an interesting discussion about the philosophy behind
dollar-sign symbols in Pd, but it seems to me like most participants are
talking around Georg's original point at the head of the thread: it's
inconvenient to get $0 (the unique-id-for-this-abstraction value) into
a message,
Hi,
there were a lot of things thrown together in the last replies.
thanks for all your thoughts about abstraction arguments - but i never
talked about them. i only talked about $0 and that is not one of them.
and i wanted to bring more consistency into Pd (think of a $0 which
means at all times
Hey guysI'm trying to create a patch that play samples 'at speed' but which
is then variable. I need an equation to turn the number of samples in a table
into the length of the sound file in seconds. Using this I should be able to
divide one by the number of seconds and use that figure to
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Chris McCormick wrote:
Almost every modern language has at least one of these basic features,
and that is why I still stubbornly refuse to call Pd a programming
language. It may be turing complete, but it's not useful for general
purpose programming. It definately could be
This should be fixed in today's build.
.hc
On Feb 7, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Martin Peach wrote:
Just installed Pd-0.41.4-extended-20090207-ubuntu-intrepid-i386.deb
and
get no menus in the main window, rendering the whole thing useless...
Message in terminal window says:
tcl:
With Pd-0.42-4 vanilla on Mac OS X 10.5.6/Intel, I can't reproduce
this. With Pd-0.41-4 vanilla, I can. I get one:
error: .x34e4d0: no such object
.hc
On Feb 9, 2009, at 12:19 AM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
I'm not sure if this is related since I'm running winxp, but I was
getting about
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Georg Werner hat gesagt: // Georg Werner wrote:
i mean message boxes. i think there is the misunderstanding. you dont
send $1 as a message, too. not as message nor creation argument.
its an expanded string inside an object or when it leaves a
24 matches
Mail list logo
