Re: [PD] pd problem

Hallo, Vitor Monaco hat gesagt: // Vitor Monaco wrote: Hello, i?m from brazil and i just started the manipulacion in PD. I?m having problems in recording... i used the object 'writesf~ 2' connected with two massage box as 'start' and 'stop'... aswered to me that the order matter... but

Re: [PD] 'kick' in Pd

Hello Vitor, You can find something here : http://footils.org/tut/pddrums/pddrums.html Cheers Thomas Vitor Monaco a écrit : Hello, I am Vitor Monaco in Sao Paulo - Brazil, I am aware of the pd to a week, some scratching sounds and articulate some schemes. I wonder if someone can give me any

Re: [PD] purepd atan2~ without expr/externals?

Hallo Miller, ah, thanks a lot. I've now discovered this in your LAC workshop patches, too, which is cool, as I was intending to use atan2 for complex waveshaping like you do in your guitar patch anyway. :) Ciao -- Frank Miller Puckette hat gesagt: // Miller Puckette wrote: Here's one I use

Re: [PD] Problems with DIO errors / audio clicking

hi, the realtime kernel of ubuntu jaunty is buggy! i've compiled a new rt-kernel and everything is working well (no glitch, no drop-out even with a very low latency (64 frames/periods)). you need a good realtime kernel, ubuntu studio was working on releasing a new rt-kernel for 9.04. i don't

Re: [PD] pd problem

Vitor Monaco wrote: Hello, i?m from brazil and i just started the manipulacion in PD. I?m having problems in recording... i used the object 'writesf~ 2' connected with two massage box as 'start' and 'stop'... aswered to me that the order matter... but didnt worked! its message box or object

Re: [PD] Problems with DIO errors / audio clicking

I'm having problems with DIO errors and glitchy audio with PD-extended 0.41.4 My computer is an HP Compaq nc6000 1.6Ghz laptop with 500mb RAM and I'm running Ubuntu 9.04. The kernel is 2.6.28-13-generic and I've tried using the realtime kernel which is 2.6.28-3-rt but it's no

[PD] Endphase - Electronic Improvisation Concert in Porto, July 23rd

*Performance Endphase laptop trio - Endphase 16 Countdown* * Alberto Bernal, João Pais and Enrique Tomás — conceptual electronic improvisation* at the *Casa da Música* in Porto, Portugal. Thursday, 23rd of July at 19h00 - Sala 2. This concert is integrated in the *6th Sound and Music

[PD] changeable receive

hello, From what I read and tried, it is impossible to change the argument of 'receive' (like the right inlet of send) in Pd-vanilla. Is there a trick to solve this in vanilla? I want to be able to insert the names of various receives in symbol boxes. The only way to do this is by using a

Re: [PD] Pduino 0.5/Firmata 2.1 beta release

Excellent, thanks for the report. You should be able to use servos using StandardFirmata too, but only on pins 9 and 10. .hc olsen wolf wrote: Hi Hans merci mille for the ongoing work on pduino including all the features! finally i could get my hands on for some testing. i did tests with

Re: [PD] ptl and IanniX

Hello Rich, I worked in few days ago on Pure Data example (IanniX). But The Kitchen died and I think the progress of this application is stopped now. But the source is open... The last developper of IanniX was Pierre Julian de la Fuente. Cheers Thomas Rich E a écrit : Hi, I've been

Re: [PD] Pduino 0.5/Firmata 2.1 beta release

Excellent, thanks for the report. You should be able to use servos using StandardFirmata too, but only on pins 9 and 10. nope using the StandardFirmata i do not get any servomove or pwm-signal on the pin 9 + 10 with output mode set to 'servo' olsen .hc olsen wolf wrote: Hi Hans merci

Re: [PD] pd problem

Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: to be able to select a file for saving via a dialog, connect the following to [writesf~] [bang( | [openpanel] For writesf~ you probably intended to use [savepanel], which allows creating new files. :) [open $1( |

Re: [PD] changeable receive

Hallo, Hans Roels hat gesagt: // Hans Roels wrote: From what I read and tried, it is impossible to change the argument of 'receive' (like the right inlet of send) in Pd-vanilla. Is there a trick to solve this in vanilla? I believe, renaming a receive is bad practice in general (I've never

Re: [PD] changeable receive

--- On Wed, 7/29/09, Hans Roels hans.ro...@versateladsl.be wrote: From: Hans Roels hans.ro...@versateladsl.be Subject: [PD] changeable receive To: pd-list@iem.at Date: Wednesday, July 29, 2009, 5:00 PM hello, From what I read and tried, it is impossible to change the argument of

Re: [PD] changeable receive

You probably could approach the problem differently, so using 'selectors' on the messages, and then using [route] to get them where they need to go. .hc Hans Roels wrote: hello, From what I read and tried, it is impossible to change the argument of 'receive' (like the right inlet of