Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-29 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
the audio side was just standard wireless hifi headphones, using lots of headphones but only two of the transmitters. The interesting part technically was the bike powered generators, but the 2 channel headphones dance floor and double DJ thing was lots of fun. ah, nice. very clever! would love

Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-28 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
I implemented a version of an idea that had been done several times in the past ... a silent disco, where there are two djs playing to wireless headsets over 2 different channels ... with all sharing the same physical space. The result is quite fun, in our case it was in a public square and was

Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-28 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
I recently worked a on a project where we wrote a custom OSC Android app that sent control data to the patch and an app called SoundWire that received audio on the phone and ran in the background. All communication was over a WiFi network we setup. Latency did obviously exist but it was

Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-26 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
Katja On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:14 PM, o...@onyx-ashanti.com onyxasha...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings! I hope all is well with you. I wanted to ask if i might gain some of your insight on a project i am undertaking. I am currently attempting to stream my audio into html5 capable web

Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-26 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
Why not send FUDI to a box connected directly to the PA system? The sound space is the headphone s.I want to use the digital sonic space to play in live. And there Afr so many smartphones in circulation that it is viable as a presentation platform now. And if it isn't. I can always connect to a

[PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-25 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
Greetings! I hope all is well with you. I wanted to ask if i might gain some of your insight on a project i am undertaking. I am currently attempting to stream my audio into html5 capable web browsers of smartphones. i have created a local network and installed nginx as my webserver. i and a

Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-25 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
of the connection. Of course you are free to modify the code to make it work with your setup -- that would mean integrating [udpsend~] into the server and [udpreceive~] into the clients' browsers, which I have no idea how to do. Martin On 2013-04-25 10:14, o...@onyx-ashanti.com wrote: Greetings

Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-25 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
netsend to a websocket and then translate the audio data chunks into JS Audio. UDP won't work on websockets AFAIK. best -august. o...@onyx-ashanti.com say: Greetings! I hope all is well with you. I wanted to ask if i might gain some of your insight on a project i am undertaking

Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-25 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
, 2013 at 11:21 PM, o...@onyx-ashanti.com onyxasha...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:54 PM, august aug...@alien.mur.at wrote: What kind of threshold are you looking for regarding latency? No more than 100ms. I feel that should be achievable with a close range private

Re: [PD] can i bypass comport?

2013-01-06 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
just wanted to update you on the progress of this issue, and thank everyone for your help! i will be posting a more detailed blog post later. onyx On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:51 PM, o...@onyx-ashanti.com onyxasha...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Martin Peach martin.pe

Re: [PD] can i bypass comport?

2012-12-01 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:33 PM, o...@onyx-ashanti.com mailto:o...@onyx-ashanti.com onyxasha...@gmail.com mailto:onyxasha...@gmail.com** wrote: I am going to investigate the updated wifly, wiflyserial and ethernet libraries onto the sketch for the rn-xv/arduino. this should

Re: [PD] can i bypass comport?

2012-11-30 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
of that i could/should try, that might sort the port conflict out? cheers, Onyx On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:33 PM, o...@onyx-ashanti.com onyxasha...@gmail.com wrote: I am going to investigate the updated wifly, wiflyserial and ethernet libraries onto the sketch for the rn-xv/arduino. this should allow

Re: [PD] can i bypass comport?

2012-11-25 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
Depends what's useable for you I guess. You just need to set the comport objects baud rate to 57600. The RN-XV manual says: Valid settings are {2400, 4800, 9600, 19200, 38400, 57600, 115200, 230400, 460800, 921600} So you could probably go faster than 57600, the arduino can do at least

Re: [PD] can i bypass comport?

2012-11-25 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
to deleting the comport but i would like to see if it works because the whole system might work better. Martin On 2012-11-25 12:31, o...@onyx-ashanti.com wrote: Depends what's useable for you I guess. You just need to set the comport objects baud rate to 57600. The RN-XV manual

Re: [PD] Networking patches to utilize multiple cores

2011-12-11 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
in your project. Colet Patrice - Mail original - De: o...@onyx-ashanti.com onyxasha...@gmail.com À: Pd-list@iem.at Envoyé: Jeudi 8 Décembre 2011 19:19:55 Objet: [PD] Networking patches to utilize multiple cores Greets. Is there a proper or preferred method for using any

[PD] Networking patches to utilize multiple cores

2011-12-09 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
Greets. Is there a proper or preferred method for using any of the networking objects in pd-extended to allow for realtime bi-directional communication between patches on the same computer, so as to utilize 2 or more cpu cores? I am currently trying to discover the best way to handle this. i

[PD] audio to arduino to PD, back to audio

2011-11-28 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
Greetings. I wanted to see if something is possible. I realized that most of my vocalizations in my system are for the vocoder. I am trying not to add too much to the hardware configuration of my system so i have been entertaining the idea of using an electret microphone amplified to send its

[PD] any easy way to get data from 3 arduino (firmata) to one comport (pduino)?

2011-10-26 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
greetings. i was wondering, any insight on taking the data from 3 arduinos running firmata and dumping them, using xbee trancievers, to a single comport in in pure data? my project uses 3 xbee transmitter nodes which communicate directly with its own xbee basestationreciever at my computer.

Re: [PD] any easy way to get data from 3 arduino (firmata) to one comport (pduino)?

2011-10-26 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
also look at the xbee object in the pure-data svn, its in externals/io/xbee. But that also means no Firmata. I didnt even know there was an xbee object! going to download it now! thanks for the link. i will check it out now! cheers .hc On Oct 26, 2011, at 7:47 AM, o...@onyx-ashanti.com

Re: [PD] is Gem working in 0.43.1 Pd-extended for Linux?

2011-10-10 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
I don't understand your statement about /usr/lib/, /pd and /pd-extended... I was talking about pd-extended source tree. Do you source compile it or get it as a binary ? I sorted it out now. i updated the synaptic package manager repository links and downloaded 0.42.5 pd-extended and edited

[PD] is Gem working in 0.43.1 Pd-extended for Linux?

2011-10-09 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
I have been pulling my locks out for 2 day trying to configure 0.43.1 to run in puredyne. every thing works except Gem. I have linked to the pd folder, i have downloaded the latest version of Gem and installed it, to no avail. every once in a while, it will render [gemhead] and no other Gem

Re: [PD] is Gem working in 0.43.1 Pd-extended for Linux?

2011-10-09 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
thanks for getting back to me. on my system there are two pd folders in /usr/lib. /pd and /pd-extended. the pd-extended doesnt have a /packages folder whereas the /pd folder does. i found and commented the line you mentioned to no avail. same issue. yes it does, but there's a trick. You have