[PD] Gem and audio, multiprocessors, Mac

2011-12-07 Thread Jean-Marie Adrien
Hi list, Is there a strategy to optimize GEM video processing and real time audio on a single Mac using pd~ : Audio in subprocess or in main process ? Any startup flags ? chmod +s stuff ? shm settings ? Run two instances of PD with messages between them ? Subprocess fifo size ? The idea

Re: [PD] Gem and audio, multiprocessors, Mac

2011-12-07 Thread Marco Donnarumma
Hi Jean, there was actually a discussion few days ago here, about the [pd~] and optimization topic. However, for audiovisual processes, apparently it's still more reliable to use two different instances of Pd. One proceses the sound and the other the video. The video Pd instance might gain some

Re: [PD] Gem and audio, multiprocessors, Mac

2011-12-07 Thread Pagano, Patrick
I increase audio latency, seems to be only real way to remove clickies From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf Of Jean-Marie Adrien Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 5:52 AM To: pd-list@iem.at Subject: [PD] Gem and audio, multiprocessors, Mac Hi list

Re: [PD] Gem and audio, multiprocessors, Mac

2011-12-07 Thread Max
i tried both, audio definetly must be in the main process, not the pd~ process. see those patches where various techniques are described: http://www.uni-weimar.de/medien/wiki/Audiovideo m. Am 07.12.2011 um 11:52 schrieb Jean-Marie Adrien: Hi list, Is there a strategy to optimize GEM video

Re: [PD] Gem and audio, multiprocessors, Mac

2011-12-07 Thread Charles Goyard
Hi, Jean-Marie Adrien wrote: dispatched on four processor cores via pd~. Just a note: it seems there's no guarantee on this. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list