Hi all
I went to a couple of meetings but found them, as a beginner, not particularly
motivating.
I think, if you got some experience with Pd, work best because they are more
focused on showing what you've already done.
As a beginner, of course, you want to attend because you want to learn
again, a main need (in my case, hope other beginners feel like saying
something) would be a Basic Course, and it is of course, out of the
scope of the meetings.
a complete basic course is outside of these meetings, at least from my
point of view. but you can slowly try to build one
Hi all
I went to a couple of meetings but found them, as a beginner, not particularly
motivating.
I think, if you got some experience with Pd, work best because they are more
focused on showing what you've already done.
As a beginner, of course, you want to attend because you want to learn
I went to a couple of meetings but found them, as a beginner, not
particularly motivating.
I think, if you got some experience with Pd, work best because they are
more focused on showing what you've already done.
As a beginner, of course, you want to attend because you want to learn
from
Well I think in a way being treated as not doing my part just for proposing
that a basic course could be helpful is not motivating.
honestly I started looking for information on line and then I went to the
meetings because I feel a bit confusing starting in that way
If one attend to the
Well I think in a way being treated as not doing my part just for
proposing that a basic course could be helpful is not motivating.
that depends how you read the message (or how I put it). main point is,
you have the power to make the meetings go to meet your needs. just tell
everyone what
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Roberto Duarte wrote:
Well I think in a way being treated as not doing my part just for
proposing that a basic course could be helpful is not motivating.
I think that it is fairly obvious that a basic course for a good amount of
money can be motivating for both sides,
there should be, but then it's up to you (and others) to ask the question. if
I (we) wanted to convince people to use Pd, something more structured would
have been put up. since it's not the case, I (we) am here to help with the
way.
I'm myself not against teaching pd regularly, as
HI
Important!
The meeting will be on 28 (twentyeight).. (if somebody is going to respond
the other thread, please, edit the subject..)
As we said before, It will be at 18:00 because there´s a pd workshop running
til 16:00
taught by Luca Carruba and Oscar Martin.. (guys, was trying
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, servando barreiro wrote:
Mat: so, how was the pdmtl #6 ? , for sure when we will have 30 pd
meetings in Berlin it will be quite different..
I don't remember very much, as pdmtl #6 (six) was nearly six years ago.
There were four presentations and a total of 10 people.
HI Husk!
Cool that you are joining the meeting again..
I will carry some things to show.. and also maybe we can jam a little bit at
the end of the session.
I think the good term for the meetings is something like 50% topic day and 50%
anarch..
c:u
HI
Hi servando
Important!
The
Mat: so, how was the pdmtl #6 ? , for sure when we will have 30 pd meetings
in Berlin it will be quite different..
I don't remember very much, as pdmtl #6 (six) was nearly six years ago. There
were four presentations and a total of 10 people. The attendance was thus much
smaller than at
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, servando barreiro wrote:
Pd Berlin also had packed days in the beguinning. some people at Nk
were surprised somehow to see the amount of people in the early meetings
in comparison with the supercollider meet.
Did you have beginners expect to hear presentations made for
13 matches
Mail list logo
