Bosko Milakovic wrote:
>
> Hm. Is it possible that when it's done urn will just bang to second
> outlet without empty bang?
>
technically it is simple.
the problem is rather from a "philosophical" point of view:
i rather not have objects trigger outlets from left to right.
unless i have some si
>From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>would be ok (for everybody, not just you) if the empty bang had to be
>triggered separately (just like in [textfile])?
>
>e.g. [urn 3]
>would output 3 random numbers; when banged a 4th time, it would (only)
>output a bang at the right-hand side; w
Hallo,
IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> obviously, if it's described in the help-patch it has to behave like
> that (that is why i don't describe features in the help-patches ;-))
>
> would be ok (for everybody, not just you) if the empty bang had to be
> triggered
On 3/27/07, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> would be ok (for everybody, not just you) if the empty bang had to be
> triggered separately (just like in [textfile])?
>
> e.g. [urn 3]
> would output 3 random numbers; when banged a 4th time, it would (only)
> output a bang at the right
padawan12 wrote:
>>
>> it would be interesting to know whether there are objections from other
>> users of this object.
>
> I must say i rather like [urn] as it is. I agree that it's weird
> to have the bang inserted into the random number stream when it
> already has it's own specific outlet.
w
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:14:17 +0200
IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bosko Milakovic wrote:
> > Hi!
>
> >
> >> are there any built-in objects that behave like you are expecting [urn]
> >> to behave? (apart from outputting unique random numbers, that is)
> >
> > I expected to be l
Bosko Milakovic wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> are there any built-in objects that behave like you are expecting [urn]
>> to behave? (apart from outputting unique random numbers, that is)
>
> I expected to be like second outlet from textfile object: on the end of
> sequence you get bang. That what I expecte
Hi!
>From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Bosko Milakovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: pd-list@iem.at
>Subject: Re: [PD] Zexy object urn bug?
>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:37:32 +0200
>
>Bosko Milakovic wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have a que
Hallo,
IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Bosko Milakovic wrote:
> > I have a question about Zexy (2.1) object urn. I think there is a bug in
> > the
> > second outlet. In the help patch this is writen:
> >
> > "when all the numbers have been drawn from the pool, th
Bosko Milakovic wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a question about Zexy (2.1) object urn. I think there is a bug in the
> second outlet. In the help patch this is writen:
>
> "when all the numbers have been drawn from the pool, the system is reset
> (the numbers are put back) and a bang is emitted via th
Hi!
I have a question about Zexy (2.1) object urn. I think there is a bug in the
second outlet. In the help patch this is writen:
"when all the numbers have been drawn from the pool, the system is reset
(the numbers are put back) and a bang is emitted via the second outlet"
But this is not tru
11 matches
Mail list logo
