Hmmm... I run across this thread when searching for information about
[mtx_*~]. If I load iemmatrix and I instantiate [matrix~] it tells me
that it is deprecated and please replace by [mtx_*~]. Which is fine
until I save, quit Pd and reopen the patch after which [mtx_*~] is no
longer available
I also run across another thread
http://www.mail-archive.com/pd-list@iem.at/msg37440.html which states
that [mtx_mul~] has been deprecated. Yet, deprecated objects are
needed to be able to instantiate their replacements. What gives?
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Michal Seta
On 2010-09-16 16:53, Michal Seta wrote:
[mtx_mul~] and it seems to behave the same as [mtx_*~]. Yet, [mtx_*~]
alone is impossible to use. The rationale of this feature escapes me.
in pd-extended, iemmatrix is somewhat broken (which is not iemmatrix's
fault but the way how pd-extended likes
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Michal Seta wrote:
Following the advice given in this thread I created a [mtx_mul~] and it
seems to behave the same as [mtx_*~]. Yet, [mtx_*~] alone is impossible
to use. The rationale of this feature escapes me.
It depends on the build. Roman has been making fixes to
Max wrote:
where is [mtx_*]?
it's in iemmatrix.
i've loaded iemmatrix and iem_matrix
try instantiating [mtx_mul].
afterwards you might be able to use [mtx_*] directly.
gfmadr
IOhannes
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and
where is [mtx_*]?
i've loaded iemmatrix and iem_matrix
specs: Pd-0.40.3-extended-20081103 on ppc os x
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
