Re: [PD] closed window not destroyed? (in l2ork, possibly in others too)

2013-06-19 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-06-18 22:58, András Murányi wrote: Hi List, I've got used to putting my PC to sleep (aka hibernation) often lately. Now there is this behaviour of Pd that when you leave a patch open and put the computer to sleep, once it wakes up Pd

Re: [PD] closed window not destroyed? (in l2ork, possibly in others too)

2013-06-19 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 22:58 +0200, András Murányi wrote: Hi List, I've got used to putting my PC to sleep (aka hibernation) often lately. Now there is this behaviour of Pd that when you leave a patch open and put the computer to sleep, once it wakes up Pd will try to do everything it

Re: [PD] closed window not destroyed? (in l2ork, possibly in others too)

2013-06-19 Thread Ivica Bukvic
I don't think it is incomplete freeing of patch resources based on what I saw so far. Could it be the watchdog's ping, isn't each of these tied to a specific timestamp? On Jun 19, 2013 3:50 AM, Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 22:58 +0200, András Murányi wrote: Hi

Re: [PD] closed window not destroyed? (in l2ork, possibly in others too)

2013-06-19 Thread Miller Puckette
This may be related: after upgrading to Fedora core 17 (linux 3.6.3-1.fc17.x86_64) I found that, after running a patch for hours or days, just shutting DSP off sometimes freezes my machine for somewhere between 1 and about 20 seconds (I think). I had never suspended or hibernated the machine. I

[PD] closed window not destroyed? (in l2ork, possibly in others too)

2013-06-18 Thread András Murányi
Hi List, I've got used to putting my PC to sleep (aka hibernation) often lately. Now there is this behaviour of Pd that when you leave a patch open and put the computer to sleep, once it wakes up Pd will try to do everything it missed while the computer was sleeping, so the CPU goes 100% for