Re: [PD] frequency components analysis

2008-07-16 Thread Jamie Bullock
On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 02:00 -0700, Julian Villegas wrote: I did, in fact I'm using sigmund~ cause somewhere in this list, someone (Miller?) said it was better to use it instead of fiddle~. Can anybody confirm that sigmund~ is better? What do you mean 'better'? What is it you are trying to

Re: [PD] frequency components analysis

2008-07-13 Thread Julian Villegas
. - Original Message From: hard off [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Julian Villegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Isidro Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pd-list@iem.at Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 8:17:10 PM Subject: Re: [PD] frequency components analysis you looked at [fiddle~] right

Re: [PD] frequency components analysis

2008-07-12 Thread hard off
you looked at [fiddle~] right? ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] frequency components analysis

2008-07-11 Thread Isidro Gonzalez
You could try the ATS technique by Juan Pampin. You will find it at the SourceForge CVS. It has several applications associated like an object for pd(atsread), several UGs for Csound, a GUI for Analyzing/Editing(ATSH) and a non-gui stand alone program for analysis(Atsa). It runs under Linux,

Re: [PD] frequency components analysis

2008-07-11 Thread Julian Villegas
Hi Isidro, Thank you for the link, the problem is that I want to extract the frequency components of a sound in realtime, like from a mic connected to my computer, and AFAIK the ATS object works only with files. Do you have any other ideas? Does anybody else? Thank you!

[PD] frequency components analysis

2008-07-10 Thread Julian Villegas
Dear list, I'm using sigmund~ for extracting the freq. components of a sound but I was wondering if you know another object that does the same job using a different approach. I'd like to compare the results obtained by different methods. Thank in advance for your replies! Julian Villegas Me