On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 09:07:46PM -0600, Ben Carney wrote:
I don't think I am very good at asking pure data related questions.
the 1000 milliseconds is an arbitrary number.
I am just trying to deduce that a 1 is not being sent or received. for any
amount of time.
so the example I gave
something like this?
very arbitrary though, it should be better to receive 0 when the
condition is false.
n
Le 08/12/10 04:07, Ben Carney a écrit :
I don't think I am very good at asking pure data related questions.
the 1000 milliseconds is an arbitrary number.
I am just trying to deduce
Or like this ? ;)
++
Jack
Le mercredi 08 décembre 2010 à 11:09 +0100, Nicolas Montgermont a
écrit :
something like this?
very arbitrary though, it should be better to receive 0 when the
condition is false.
n
Le 08/12/10 04:07, Ben Carney a écrit :
I don't think I am very good at
hey list,
lets say I have a metro that sends a bang every one second, for the rest of
the 999 miliseconds, could I somehow deduce a zero message?
it doesn't need to be that granular(I don't need 999 0s for every 1)
something like
[metro 1000]
|
|
[1 \
|
|
[if not currently a 1 then zero]
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Ben Carney wrote:
lets say I have a metro that sends a bang every one second, for the rest
of the 999 miliseconds, could I somehow deduce a zero message?
it doesn't need to be that granular(I don't need 999 0s for every 1)
Even though the base unit of [metro]'s time is
