Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-13 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010, Husk 00 wrote: On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote: Some of us have restrictions about the use of software. If our contract says we have to teach only free software (because the course is explicitly about free software, for example),

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-13 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Jose Luis Santorcuato wrote: Gridflow have also recommended, but still can not quite decipher the code. What can I answer to this ? (Can you ask some specific questions instead ?) ___ | Mathieu Bouchard

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-13 Thread Jose Luis Santorcuato
Thanks Mathieu, well, I've been tracking with pix_background and pix_blob, also with the controversial PiDiP library, is very sad to have problems... but...life ... I programming on processing and arduino and yet can not understand all the code a gridflow,I spent so not much time, I teach in the

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-12 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Husk 00 wrote: You have many tools to don't run into problematic issue during workshops. I mean, always you will find an alternative to an object that suit your needs on your platform. The solution is not ban windows as not ban pidip or unauthorize. Is just talk about

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-12 Thread patko
it's not playlist~ that has been windozified by Krzysztof Czaja, it's Scrolllist. He has been murdered by sevy since he did that or what? - ydego...@gmail.com a écrit : it could not be all code is heavily unix-bounded you had good LSD? sevy Derek Holzer wrote: I had two

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-12 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Jose Luis Santorcuato wrote: Mathieu Bouchard wrote :   I don't quite understand why people do motion detection with squares like that. I use a generic motion detection that gets me the centre of the motion, and then when I rescale the values, it may split the possible

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-12 Thread ydego...@gmail.com
Mathieu Bouchard wrote: On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Husk 00 wrote: You have many tools to don't run into problematic issue during workshops. I mean, always you will find an alternative to an object that suit your needs on your platform. The solution is not ban windows as not ban pidip or

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-12 Thread patrick
On 10-12-12 05:45 AM, Derek Holzer wrote: I had two very disappointed workshoppers last week trying to get [playlist] for windows. AFAIK it used to work pre-PDx many years ago, maybe that was when a windows DLL was still available. D. maybe they can use mtl/gBrowser.. under ui in

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-12 Thread ydego...@gmail.com
patrick wrote: On 10-12-12 05:45 AM, Derek Holzer wrote: I had two very disappointed workshoppers last week trying to get [playlist] for windows. AFAIK it used to work pre-PDx many years ago, maybe that was when a windows DLL was still available. D. maybe they can use mtl/gBrowser.. under

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-12 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010, ydego...@gmail.com wrote: Mathieu Bouchard wrote: Look at this - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html everybody should be 'free' to carry a gun, someone said You are «free» to be besides the point.

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-12 Thread Husk 00
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote: On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Husk 00 wrote: You have many tools to don't run into problematic issue during workshops. I mean, always you will find an alternative to an object that suit your needs on your platform. The solution

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-11 Thread João Pais
i will check again but the last time i used cooled~ or playlist~ they did not work cross platform they don't, probably are the only ones (don't know by heart) ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-11 Thread Derek Holzer
I had two very disappointed workshoppers last week trying to get [playlist] for windows. AFAIK it used to work pre-PDx many years ago, maybe that was when a windows DLL was still available. D. On 12/11/10 9:28 PM, João Pais wrote: i will check again but the last time i used cooled~ or

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-11 Thread ydego...@gmail.com
it could not be all code is heavily unix-bounded you had good LSD? sevy Derek Holzer wrote: I had two very disappointed workshoppers last week trying to get [playlist] for windows. AFAIK it used to work pre-PDx many years ago, maybe that was when a windows DLL was still available. D. On

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Dec 9, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: --- On Thu, 12/9/10, Pagano, Patrick p...@digitalworlds.ufl.edu wrote: From: Pagano, Patrick p...@digitalworlds.ufl.edu Subject: Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd- pidip into Debian To: Husk 00 hus...@gmail.com,

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-10 Thread ydego...@gmail.com
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Dec 9, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: --- On Thu, 12/9/10, Pagano, Patrick p...@digitalworlds.ufl.edu wrote: From: Pagano, Patrick p...@digitalworlds.ufl.edu Subject: Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian To:

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-10 Thread Pagano, Patrick
i will check again but the last time i used cooled~ or playlist~ they did not work cross platform I found that veejay reloaded support frei0r now too i was just using mgrid to teach a simple video theremin to get students interested in pd but alot of kids either have windows 7 or even vista

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-09 Thread Derek Holzer
You probably mean [grid], another of Degoyon's objects from the unauthorized lib. This means it could have the same potential problems for inclusion in PDx as PiDiP. Another problem with this lib is the lack of Windows binaries in PDx, I've run into this issue at workshops before. Obviously I

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-09 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Up until a few days ago, 'unauthorized' was GPL, so we can continue using that version under the GPL. That means that version can also continue to be included in Pd-extended since Pd-extended is also GPL. .hc On Dec 9, 2010, at 8:29 AM, Pagano, Patrick wrote: i just recently had to

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-09 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
--- On Thu, 12/9/10, Pagano, Patrick p...@digitalworlds.ufl.edu wrote: From: Pagano, Patrick p...@digitalworlds.ufl.edu Subject: Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian To: Husk 00 hus...@gmail.com, Derek Holzer de...@umatic.nl Cc: pd-list PD-list@iem.at

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-08 Thread Jose Luis Santorcuato
Well, I used pix_blob, or blob tracker, do not remember exactly, but I always gave erratic readings or based only on two axes, I like working with coordinate and mgrid are well suited to that need. Mathieu Gridflow ever asked me, I have not tried what Derek and Mathieu proposes no doubt I will

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-08 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Which kind of tracking to do want to do? It should be pretty easy to a motiongrid as an abstraction. Start with the diff tracking Gem example, and then just break it down into a grid. .hc On Dec 7, 2010, at 10:54 PM, Pagano, Patrick wrote: lets make a replacement patch. where shall we

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-08 Thread Jack
Hello, You can use [pix_crop] with [pix_movement]/[pix_movement2] and [pix_blob] to have something similar to [pdp_mgrid]. [pix_crop] will return a subimage of a (for example) video from a webcam. Apply on each subimage [pix_movement]/[pix_movement2] and [pix_blob] to return the id (or coords) of

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-08 Thread Jose Luis Santorcuato
Hi Jack!, I was testing proposed by colleagues, and it works, I removed the noise, not yet determined what happens, but it becomes stable, at least the stable axes can provide data, but I keep trying, I've worked with opencv and works without problems, also gridflow is amazing ... Now, the moment

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-07 Thread Andy Farnell
You could be forgiven. The effort to forge this confusion is one of the defining propaganda campaigns of the 21st Century. There are lawyers out there who don't know the difference. On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:54:19 -0500 (EST) Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote: On Mon, 6 Dec 2010,

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-07 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
--- On Tue, 12/7/10, Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk wrote: From: Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk Subject: Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian To: pd-list@iem.at Date: Tuesday, December 7, 2010, 9:50 AM You could be forgiven. The

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-07 Thread Derek Holzer
What is there exactly in PiDiP that people need so badly? The (IMHO ugly) video filters from EffecTV? Or the streaming part? In either case, the solution seems simple to me. PDP itself isn't really being maintained AFAIK, and isn't completely cross-platform anyways, so why not just implement

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-07 Thread Jose Luis Santorcuato
Hi list!, PiDiP In my humble opinion is a great tool for video work, a complement to or Gem or Gridflow and actually doing would be a shame to stay out of pd extended. I like the possibilities of interaction and partnership with OpenCV ... is a penalty if it is not in pd, but is also addressing

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-07 Thread Pagano, Patrick
yes, all of the effectTV filters if we can get pix_effectTV half of it would be obsolete but also pdp_mgrid pdp_cmap pdp_ctrack pdp_ascii are essential pdp_qt will be obsolete when we get either pix_film OR pix_movie or whatever to play audio directly from a movie without extra table banging

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-07 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Pagano, Patrick wrote: pdp_mgrid I don't quite understand why people do motion detection with squares like that. I use a generic motion detection that gets me the centre of the motion, and then when I rescale the values, it may split the possible results into bands or

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-07 Thread Jose Luis Santorcuato
I don't quite understand why people do motion detection with squares like that. I use a generic motion detection that gets me the centre of the motion, and then when I rescale the values, it may split the possible results into bands or squares because of rounding (if I quantise them). Hi all!,

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-07 Thread Derek Holzer
Motion tracking can be done easily in GEM with a combination of [pix-background] to create a histrogram showing only changed pixel values, and [pix_blob] to track the center of gravity of those changed values. D. On 12/7/10 6:43 PM, Jose Luis Santorcuato wrote: I don't quite understand why

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-07 Thread Pagano, Patrick
lets make a replacement patch. where shall we begin? pp From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf Of Derek Holzer [de...@umatic.nl] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 4:32 PM To: pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] new license for pidip

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-06 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010, Jose Luis Santorcuato wrote: Hi list... a big issue, however ... PiDiP remain in extended pd libraries? I don't know, ... five years ago, I was being flamed by Degoyon out of nowhere (as usual), and so, I got curious about which license he used for his software, because

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-06 Thread Pagano, Patrick
So what does this really mean? We have to go back to building pidip from source if we want to use it? has it changed that much from when it was released? I am just starting to get students interested in learning these objects and would like to continue Why is there this animosity?

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-06 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010, John Harrison wrote: I was curious, since EffecTV is GPL and a significant part of PiDiP is a port of EffecTV --- does this make an impact on what licenses are valid for PiDiP? Relicensing of EffecTV code from GPL to Degoyon license is ILLEGAL, and linking of EffecTV code

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-06 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Yeah, I think that's the case, its been discussed before: http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-ot/2006-01/001371.html But legally, the way that it goes, is that licenses have to be explicitly produced by the respective copyright holders,

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-06 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Pagano, Patrick wrote: So what does this really mean? We have to go back to building pidip from source if we want to use it? has it changed that much from when it was released? I am just starting to get students interested in learning these objects and would like to

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-06 Thread Andy Farnell
Ouch, my eyes! http://www.352media.com/rantingandraving/CMFiles/Images/CapsLock.jpg Shouting in caps lock doen't make it LEGAL!!!11! or something :) On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:42:03 -0500 (EST) Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote: On Sun, 5 Dec 2010, John Harrison wrote: I was

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-06 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: * You can't license your software to prohibit use by T7 countries, but you can include clauses to note the requirements placed on the licensee by the US Government, and state that users should abide by all applicable laws. But this can't

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-06 Thread Pagano, Patrick
illegal where? Globally? What of fair use? From: Mathieu Bouchard [ma...@artengine.ca] Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 8:59 AM To: Pagano, Patrick Cc: Hans-Christoph Steiner; ydego...@gmail.com; pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] new license for pidip and

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-06 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Pagano, Patrick wrote: illegal where? Globally? Anywhere it is that licenses written by non-lawyers mean anything. Which means, pretty much everywhere copyright laws may apply today. What of fair use? Fair use traditionally overrides *any* license, thus if you know

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Its not illegal because its a not about laws, but rather copyright licenses, which is more like contracts, i.e. agreements between private parties. Currently pidip is in a state where the two licenses conflict irreconcilably. So if you use pidip under Yves' license, you could be sued

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-06 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Its not illegal because its a not about laws, but rather copyright licenses, which is more like contracts, i.e. agreements between private parties. Right. I used the wrong word. I'm sorry.

[PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-05 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
You'll also have to consider SourceForge's Terms of Use, which seem to disallow software with licenses that do not fit into the Open Source Definition. (from http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sitelegal/wiki/What%20projects%20qualify%20for%20hosting%20at%20SourceForge.net?) # The software

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-05 Thread ydego...@gmail.com
ola, you're totally right that we should get out of sourceforge, that grants more rights to US citizens than to others. we can find a domain in .fi, .de, .ch or .nl, if you know what i mean. so yeh you can remove unauthorized and pidip from sourceforge. ciao, sevy pd _ and could you leave

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-05 Thread András Murányi
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:50 PM, ydego...@gmail.com ydego...@gmail.comwrote: ola, you're totally right that we should get out of sourceforge, that grants more rights to US citizens than to others. we can find a domain in .fi, .de, .ch or .nl, if you know what i mean. so yeh you can

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-05 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
berlios is based in Germany, but I think they have similar restrictions on the license. .hc On Dec 5, 2010, at 2:50 PM, ydego...@gmail.com wrote: ola, you're totally right that we should get out of sourceforge, that grants more rights to US citizens than to others. we can find a domain

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-05 Thread Jose Luis Santorcuato
Hi list... a big issue, however ... PiDiP remain in extended pd libraries? Best regards José 2010/12/5 Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at berlios is based in Germany, but I think they have similar restrictions on the license. .hc On Dec 5, 2010, at 2:50 PM, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-05 Thread John Harrison
I was curious, since EffecTV is GPL and a significant part of PiDiP is a port of EffecTV --- does this make an impact on what licenses are valid for PiDiP? -John On 12/05/2010 07:03 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: berlios is based in Germany, but I think they have similar restrictions on

Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

2010-12-05 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Yeah, I think that's the case, its been discussed before: http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-ot/2006-01/001371.html .hc On Dec 5, 2010, at 8:54 PM, John Harrison wrote: I was curious, since EffecTV is GPL and a significant part of PiDiP is a port of EffecTV --- does this make an impact