On Oct 28, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> > I suggest that the bugs are in the
> > descriptions rather than the objects
>
> yep, that is what I meant. It's actually no bug then, just some descriptive
> mistake, easily correctable by altering the comments in the help files.
> I suggest that the bugs are in the
> descriptions rather than the objects
yep, that is what I meant. It's actually no bug then, just some descriptive
mistake, easily correctable by altering the comments in the help files.
I was trying to get a hold of the author in here to warn him about it, bu
otes-0.2: Live music notation for Pure Data, now with dynamics!
http://sharktracks.co.uk/
>
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner
>To: pd-list@iem.at
>Sent: Wednesday, 24 October 2012, 2:48
>Subject: Re: [PD] windowing extended objetcs, mistakes on hel
I don't quite follow, but if you think there are bugs in the windowing
objects, you should file a bug report.
.hc
On 10/16/2012 05:03 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> seem to have nailed the gaussian window, but with different width values
> than the object.
>
> 2012/10/16 Alexandre Torres
seem to have nailed the gaussian window, but with different width values
than the object.
2012/10/16 Alexandre Torres Porres
> Hi there, I was studying the window functions for FFT, so I was trying to
> build into vanilla pacthes the window functions that come on Pd-Extended
> [windowing] packag
Hi there, I was studying the window functions for FFT, so I was trying to
build into vanilla pacthes the window functions that come on Pd-Extended
[windowing] package. I got to do them all, but kaiser~ and gaussian~
Do any of you feel capable to perform this ver nerdy taks?
Well, anyway, here are
