Ok, so Standard Improved BSD, or SIBSD seems to be the answer to my
question.
Thanks,
Jonathan
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at
To: Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.com
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Mon, June 14, 2010 11:02:14 AM
Subject: Re: [PD
...@at.or.at
*To:* Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.com
*Cc:* pd-list@iem.at
*Sent:* Mon, June 14, 2010 11:02:14 AM
*Subject:* Re: [PD] cyclone license
The core of Pd from MIller is BSD. He distributes it with some GPLv2 stuff
in it. Pd-extended includes BSD, GPLv2 and GPLv3 code, so
...@at.or.at; pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Sun, June 20, 2010 11:56:59 AM
Subject: Re: [PD] cyclone license
The difference it seems is that BSD allows proprietary use of the software.
Right??
2010/6/20 Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Ok, so Standard Improved BSD, or SIBSD seems to be the answer to my
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 05:25:28PM -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
What is the license for all the cyclone objects? Is it the same license for
all of them?
One of the source files says to check LICENSE.txt for the distribution, which
I think would be GPLv2, but
then there's a LICENSE.txt
I think it *have to be* GPL (v.3), since PD is free software, doesn't it?
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Bernardo, BSD licens also is free software. There are a lot of different
free software license. not only GPL, and Puredta is not GPL.
2010/6/14 Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.com
I think it *have to be* GPL (v.3), since PD is free software, doesn't it?
I though PD was GNU/PGL
On 14 June 2010 11:53, Ricardo Lameiro ricardolame...@gmail.com wrote:
Bernardo, BSD licens also is free software. There are a lot of different
free software license. not only GPL, and Puredta is not GPL.
2010/6/14 Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.com
I think
No problem, it is a common situation :D AFAIK Pd is in some kind of BSD
license, i think a modified BSD, but not sure.
2010/6/14 Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.com
I though PD was GNU/PGL
On 14 June 2010 11:53, Ricardo Lameiro ricardolame...@gmail.com wrote:
Bernardo, BSD licens
What's the actual difference between GNU/GPL and BSD
On 14 June 2010 11:59, Ricardo Lameiro ricardolame...@gmail.com wrote:
No problem, it is a common situation :D AFAIK Pd is in some kind of BSD
license, i think a modified BSD, but not sure.
2010/6/14 Bernardo Barros
The core of Pd from MIller is BSD. He distributes it with some GPLv2
stuff in it. Pd-extended includes BSD, GPLv2 and GPLv3 code, so its
GPLv3 as a whole pacakge.
.hc
On Jun 14, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
I though PD was GNU/PGL
On 14 June 2010 11:53, Ricardo Lameiro
10 matches
Mail list logo
