Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

2013-02-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-02-05 22:52, Ivica Bukvic wrote: It is the latest Gem from svn, so I am not sure what is not working. Can svn? Gem has switched to git in 2011. hopefully you meant vcs instead. fgmasdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

Re: [PD] Freezes with Pd-Extended and Jack

2013-02-06 Thread Raphael Raccuia
Actually I didn't tried... At the moment I don't have so much time to experiment another version, maybe later, seems great project. rr Le 02. 02. 13 15:19, Ivica Bukvic a écrit : Does this affect you on pd-l2ork as well? On Feb 2, 2013 3:10 AM, Raphael Raccuia rafael.racc...@blindekinder.com

Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

2013-02-06 Thread Charles Goyard
Hi, thanks. More specific: all Gem objects were dashed. after adding declare -path /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/Gem gemhead and gemwin objects are ok but not others such as color, rotate, square. Here's a bit of console output: gemreceive __gem_render $1 ... couldn't create gemreceive

Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

2013-02-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-02-06 09:54, Charles Goyard wrote: Hi, thanks. More specific: all Gem objects were dashed. after adding declare -path /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/Gem gemhead and gemwin objects are ok but not others such as color, rotate, square. you

Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

2013-02-06 Thread Charles Goyard
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: all Gem objects were dashed. after adding declare -path /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/Gem gemhead and gemwin objects are ok but not others such as color, rotate, square. you need to _load_ Gem: [declare -lib Gem] i understand that you have not loaded Gem and only

Re: [PD] pidip

2013-02-06 Thread Lorenzo Sutton
On 04/02/13 15:48, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: might also be packaged for Debian/Ubuntu as part of Pure Dyne. FYI... http://puredyne-list-now-closed.466513.n3.nabble.com/puredyne-announcement-from-the-Puredyne-developers-td3717873.html Lorenzo. .hc On 02/04/2013 08:02 AM, Pagano, Patrick

Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

2013-02-06 Thread Charles Goyard
Charles Goyard wrote: IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: all Gem objects were dashed. after adding declare -path /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/Gem gemhead and gemwin objects are ok but not others such as color, rotate, square. you need to _load_ Gem: [declare -lib Gem] i understand that you

Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

2013-02-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-02-06 14:20, Charles Goyard wrote: I guess it's more a bug of Gem install script rather than pd-l2ork, but I just wanted to point that out. Gem's install script (aka Makefile) installs everything, including all compiled backends. what

Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

2013-02-06 Thread Ivica Bukvic
How did you install pd-l2ork? If you tried compiling it yourself and did not have all the development libraries necessary for compiling Gem, then the installer would never build Gem and give you plenty of errors. On the software page I provided a list of Ubuntu packages you would need to compile

Re: [PD] pidip

2013-02-06 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
I just finished cleaning up both pdp and pidip libs to be fully auto-buildable as part of pd-l2ork (including freenect, artoolkit, opencv, etc.). There are a number of packages you need to install from launchpad in order to get all the externals to build. Stay tuned for the next release coming

Re: [PD] pidip

2013-02-06 Thread Pagano, Patrick
That is supremely cool. Are there examples included for pdp_artoolkit? Students had a hard time with the fiducials at first and a simple example goes a long way. Currently, as I said I used the built version of pdp and it loads, when I compiled pdp_0.12-6 it gave a linking error with gsl

[PD] Fwd: Fwd: file format for GEM

2013-02-06 Thread Stephan Elliot Perez
-- Forwarded message -- From: Stephan Elliot Perez dreamoftheshoreofanotherwo...@gmail.com Date: Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:25 PM Subject: Re: [PD] Fwd: file format for GEM To: IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at Hi again, I have tried converting to .mov with the photo-jpeg

Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

2013-02-06 Thread Fero Kiraly
I just now updated archlinux packages. pd-l2ork now installs to /usr/local... so that prevent collision to pd-ext. fk. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] pidip

2013-02-06 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
On 02/06/2013 09:36 AM, Pagano, Patrick wrote: That is supremely cool. Are there examples included for pdp_artoolkit? Students had a hard time with the fiducials at first and a simple example goes a long way. There is one help patch that I tested and it worked (albeit tracking was a bit slow,

Re: [PD] pidip

2013-02-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Just be aware that pidip is not free software because it has clauses in its license that restrict what it can be used for. Including pidip in your package means your package can no longer be legally distributed as binaries since the pidip license terms conflict with the GPL license terms. .hc

Re: [PD] pidip

2013-02-06 Thread Pagano, Patrick
Let me know how I can help/participate in this. I have a 5 screen theatre I would love to test this in when you get it built. This with Extended View Toolkit could be a very powerful tool(s) pp -Original Message- From: Ivica Ico Bukvic [mailto:i...@vt.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 06,

Re: [PD] pidip

2013-02-06 Thread John Harrison
I thought there was an earlier version of PiDiP which was and could be included with Pd-extended because it was released under an acceptable/compatible license? On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.atwrote: Just be aware that pidip is not free software because it

Re: [PD] pidip

2013-02-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I'm not aware of that. Perhaps you're thinking about how pidip should all be GPL, since it is based on GPL code. The GPL does not allow more license restrictions, and the pidip license does just that. So that means that the GPL code included in pidip is still GPL, but the code that sevy

Re: [PD] pidip

2013-02-06 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
- Original Message - From: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at To: John Harrison johnharrison...@gmail.com Cc: pd-list@iem.at Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2013 11:54 AM Subject: Re: [PD] pidip I'm not aware of that.  Perhaps you're thinking about how pidip should all be GPL,

Re: [PD] pidip

2013-02-06 Thread Pagano, Patrick
No I don't think so Sent from my iPhone On Feb 6, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at To: John Harrison johnharrison...@gmail.com Cc: pd-list@iem.at Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2013 11:54 AM

Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

2013-02-06 Thread Charles Goyard
Hi, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2013-02-06 14:20, Charles Goyard wrote: I guess it's more a bug of Gem install script rather than pd-l2ork, but I just wanted to point that out. Gem's install script (aka Makefile) installs everything, including all compiled backends. what makes you say

[PD] Fwd: Re: enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

2013-02-06 Thread Ivica Bukvic
Forgot to copy the list -- Forwarded message -- From: Ivica Bukvic i...@vt.edu Date: Feb 6, 2013 3:13 PM Subject: Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ? To: Charles Goyard c...@fsck.fr Cc: On Feb 6, 2013 3:07 PM, Charles Goyard c...@fsck.fr wrote: Hi,

Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

2013-02-06 Thread Charles Goyard
(also forgot to send to the list) Hi, 1. Why are you compiling gem separately when pd-l2ork compiles it for you and includes it with its binary package? 2. Why are you trying to use pd-vanilla includes with pd-l2ork (unless you are using pd instead of pd-l2ork)? The two are not compatible

Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

2013-02-06 Thread Charles Goyard
Charles Goyard wrote: While I'm typing, my computer is building a fresh copy of pd-l2ork with PKGBUILD to see if everything is ok. so everythings works fine with the /usr/local/ version. Except that the default.pdl2ork file is missing with the brand new PKGBUILD, so it makes it hard to have

Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

2013-02-06 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
On 02/06/2013 04:12 PM, Charles Goyard wrote: Charles Goyard wrote: While I'm typing, my computer is building a fresh copy of pd-l2ork with PKGBUILD to see if everything is ok. so everythings works fine with the /usr/local/ version. Except that the default.pdl2ork file is missing with the

[PD] online video conferencing

2013-02-06 Thread eldad tsabary
Hi all, I am looking for an accessible way to do a video conference with multiple parties (4 or 5) for a telematic performance. The bandwidth is there and visual latency is not an issue in this case. Any ideas about a stable platform for this would be greatly appreciated. In the past I worked

Re: [PD] online video conferencing

2013-02-06 Thread Pagano, Patrick
Look at IOCOM Sent from my iPhone On Feb 6, 2013, at 6:02 PM, eldad tsabary tazberryd...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I am looking for an accessible way to do a video conference with multiple parties (4 or 5) for a telematic performance. The bandwidth is there and visual latency is not an

Re: [PD] [cec-c] online video conferencing

2013-02-06 Thread Tommaso Perego
in our uni we use this http://www.bigbluebutton.org/ ;) On 6 Feb 2013, at 23:01, eldad tsabary tazberryd...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I am looking for an accessible way to do a video conference with multiple parties (4 or 5) for a telematic performance. The bandwidth is there and visual

Re: [PD] RE : package system for Pd WAS: Plugin auto install feature to Pure data

2013-02-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Try writing something in a language you are familiar with. Anything working is better than nothing :) Tcl is a bit odd, but its pretty easy for almost all of what this project would require. .hc On 02/05/2013 11:08 PM, Billy Stiltner wrote: sounds right up my alley but i have not a clue

Re: [PD] Plugin auto install feature to Pure data

2013-02-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
This stuff is already pretty well defined in the library template and the *-meta.pd file. I think the meta file would be the place to add things like dependencies also. http://puredata.info/docs/developer/Libdir http://puredata.info/docs/developer/LibraryTemplate .hc On 02/05/2013 04:11 PM,

Re: [PD] Plugin auto install feature to Pure data

2013-02-06 Thread fls
Thanks Hans! Just one doubt: How does it work for different architectures? Should we pack windows, linux and Mac in different packages? Or can we include them in one package and the installer copies just the right one? cheers f schiavoni This stuff is already pretty well defined in the

Re: [PD] online video conferencing

2013-02-06 Thread fls
Hi Eldad! Recently we had a netmusic conference (http://netmusic2013.wordpress.com/) and we used jacktrip for audio streams and bluejeans (http://bluejeans.com/) to the video streams. Instead of some problems with bluejeans, it worked. Bests Schiavoni Hi all, I am looking for an accessible

Re: [PD] online video conferencing

2013-02-06 Thread eldad tsabary
This is an awesome tool Do you know their costs? Thanks Eldad On 2013-02-06, at 7:04 PM, Pagano, Patrick wrote: Look at IOCOM Sent from my iPhone On Feb 6, 2013, at 6:02 PM, eldad tsabary tazberryd...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I am looking for an accessible way to do a video

[PD] RE : Re: Plugin auto install feature to Pure data

2013-02-06 Thread colet.patrice
Just to add one cent, it looks simpler to put everything on same package, and should be faster for making server backups. Patrice Colet  Message d'origine De : f...@rendera.com.br Date : 07/02/2013 5:01 (GMT+00:00) A : pd-list@iem.at Objet : Re: [PD] Plugin auto