Ah thanks,
If I wanted to initialize an array with some other data (basically i want to
come up with a rand score) is there a good way to do that?
On Apr 8, 2012, at 10:40 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> It's pretty easy if you don't mind having dsp on:
>
> [noise~]
> |
> | [bang(
> | /
> [tabw
It's pretty easy if you don't mind having dsp on:
[noise~]
|
| [bang(
| /
[tabwrite~ foo]
[table foo]
>
> From: Matthew Tytel
>To: pd-list@iem.at
>Sent: Monday, April 9, 2012 1:23 AM
>Subject: [PD] Initializing an array with random data.
>
>
>Hi there,
Hi there,
I'm looking for a good way to reinitialize data in an array with random
data.
Basically I want to be able to bang a subpatch and have it enter totally
new randomized data into it.
I made one using the step object but it's very hacked together. Any
suggestions?
Apologies if this isn't th
hi everyone,
people might be interested to see puredata running on a tablet (uPad +-
140$). both inputs and outputs are working.
http://www.workinprogress.ca/puredata-tablet/
cheers
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management
On 2012-04-08 20:45, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Apr 8, 2012, at 3:17 PM, katja wrote:
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The main reason why this is still like this is because no one has written
better code, then done thorough testing in order to prove that
On Apr 8, 2012, at 3:17 PM, katja wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> The main reason why this is still like this is because no one has written
>> better code, then done thorough testing in order to prove that the new code
>> doesn't break anything. P
Whops, I should have read the other replies first :$
On 04/09/2012 01:23 AM, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
On 04/08/2012 04:27 PM, katja wrote:
I've once compiled (vanilla) Pd with the format specifiers changed to
print up to 8 significant digits, and soon found why it is normally
done with 6 digi
I'll be there, I present my paper on saturday. :) see ya
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Charles Henry wrote:
> I will be out to see the conference also. I noticed you and Peter
> will be the first presenters--I will look forward to it.
>
> Chuck
>
> On 4/8/12, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> > si
On 04/08/2012 04:27 PM, katja wrote:
I've once compiled (vanilla) Pd with the format specifiers changed to
print up to 8 significant digits, and soon found why it is normally
done with 6 digits max. You get things like this:
33 * 0.3 = 9.91
That is completely unrelated. That is an issue i
I will be out to see the conference also. I noticed you and Peter
will be the first presenters--I will look forward to it.
Chuck
On 4/8/12, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> since i spend a few days in san francisco (for visiting the linux audio
> conference [1] in stanford) i wanted to ask whether t
since i spend a few days in san francisco (for visiting the linux audio
conference [1] in stanford) i wanted to ask whether there are some Pders
round here who would like to go for a beer...
fgmasdr
IOhannes
[1] http://lac.linuxaudio.org/2012/
___
Hmm, I thought I got rid of that issue with it sticking to the mouse pointer...
arg. Can you tell me the steps to reproduce it?
I should add more to the help patch. The goal was to make it as
self-explanatory as possible. So you can click and move the filter center and
gain, and click and d
you'll also need to add to the line: -jack
also be sure that jack is running.
cheers,
Iain
On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 15:31 -0400, Rishabh Natarajan wrote:
> Hi Iain,
>
>
> When trying to start pd-extended from command line with the '-channels
> 16' argument, I get an error saying:
>
>
> Error nu
Hans,
This is so exciting. The binary is working here on a MacIntosh 2.8 GHz Intel
Core 2 Duo with OS 10.6.8. I thought you might appreciate some quick user
feedback.
When I click the graphic, it lets me adjust frequency and amplitude, but then
my cursor gets stuck to it like mouse up isn't wo
Here's a patch I submitted:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2952880&group_id=55736&atid=478072
Martin
On 2012-04-08 15:17, katja wrote:
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The main reason why this is still like this is because no one has written
be
Hi Iain,
When trying to start pd-extended from command line with the '-channels 16'
argument, I get an error saying:
Error number -9998 opening portaudio stream
Error message: Invalid number of channels
I can't seem to figure out why this is happening and am not able to find
any sources on the i
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> The main reason why this is still like this is because no one has written
> better code, then done thorough testing in order to prove that the new code
> doesn't break anything. People have written better code for this before, no
Yay - very nice.
Works great with both most recent Pd & PdE on Puredyne.
Cheers,
Julian
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
@Iain: Yes, how silly of me, the crossfade is to avoid the clicks. I never
thought of it that way. Hence the pleas to ignore my naivete. Thanks for
sharing the patch with me. I shall go through it and I'm sure it will clear
out a lot of things.
@Colet Patrice: Hey, thanks for writing to me. Well,
The main reason why this is still like this is because no one has written
better code, then done thorough testing in order to prove that the new code
doesn't break anything. People have written better code for this before, no
one has done the thorough testing part...
.hc
On Apr 7, 2012, at 1
Ok, big update, this should work a lot better.
http://puredata.info/downloads/filterview
I changed the formula below to be a fixed resolution of 5 pixels. I was
thinking that this should be generalized into a general biquad~ library, so
with objects like [bandpass] to calculate biquad coeffic
Hello Rishabh,
you should be able to use jack for local and distant sound system,
no need for internal drivers through pd.
In both adc~ and dac~ each argument is the number of audio voice coming from/to
jack
eg: [adc~ 4 1 2 3] would output from left to right the inputs 4 1 2 3 from jack
interfac
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Matteo Sisti Sette
wrote:
>
> On 04/08/2012 04:58 AM, Martin Peach wrote:
>>
>> It's because Pd saves the value by printing it as text into the patch
>> file using a reduced precision format specifier (%g instead of %f, or
>> %0.6f) so that the numbers look good on
On 04/08/2012 04:58 AM, Martin Peach wrote:
It's because Pd saves the value by printing it as text into the patch
file using a reduced precision format specifier (%g instead of %f, or
%0.6f) so that the numbers look good on screen, with no extra zeros for
example.
I don't like it either.
I wond
If this happens, then it should be really given some thought.
I guess one of the downsides of graphical dataflow is that we see what we
get (kinda like WYSIWIG editors), therefore there should be a way to always
get dirty and non rounded numbers on screen and onto loaded patches.
Otherwise we ar
Hi Rishabh,
If you switch between two input signals without some kind of cross-fade
(fading one signal out while the other is faded in) you will most likely
experience an audible click.
To mix between two groups of 8 inputs you can use 8 polygate~ objects
with the arguments of each one set for ex
Hello,
I remember that some time ago, an elaborate project for mixing over TCP/IP
was released, called XmiX. There may be a lot of tricks in it that you can
use. See this announcement on Pd forum:
http://puredata.hurleur.com/sujet-5114-xmix-announce
Katja
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Ris
27 matches
Mail list logo
