Re: [PD] [table] update notification

2012-03-12 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 09:38 -0800, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: - Original Message - From: Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com To: pd-list pd-list@iem.at Cc: Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 8:30 AM Subject: Re: [PD] [table] update notification On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 09:15

Re: [PD] [table] update notification

2012-03-12 Thread Billy Stiltner
: - Original Message - From: Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com To: pd-list pd-list@iem.at Cc: Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 8:30 AM Subject: Re: [PD] [table] update notification On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 09:15 -0800, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: Pd-l2ork has a feature

Re: [PD] [table] update notification

2012-03-08 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 09:15 -0800, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: Pd-l2ork has a feature where you can [r arrayname_changed] and you'll get a bang when the array is modified with the mouse. That's nice feature of Pd-l2ork. If you want a notification when using tabwrite/etc., well, when those

Re: [PD] [table] update notification

2012-03-08 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 14:50 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 14:37 +0100, batinste wrote: Hi Rough approach : you could compare your array with the reference array by playing once from time to time the two simultaneously, sum (the first) and (the second *-1) and check

Re: [PD] [table] update notification

2012-03-08 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 15:00 +0100, Pierre Massat wrote: How about using [tabreceive~] with properly set blocksize in a subpatch? Never tried it though. From what I know, re-blocking also costs something. And you can re-block only in powers of two, if I am not mistaken. Actually, [tabplay~]

Re: [PD] [table] update notification

2012-03-08 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
- Original Message - From: Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com To: pd-list pd-list@iem.at Cc: Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 8:30 AM Subject: Re: [PD] [table] update notification On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 09:15 -0800, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: Pd-l2ork has a feature where you can [r

Re: [PD] [table] update notification

2012-03-08 Thread William Brent
...@yahoo.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com To: pd-list pd-list@iem.at Cc: Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 8:30 AM Subject: Re: [PD] [table] update notification On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 09:15 -0800, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:  Pd-l2ork has a feature where

[PD] [table] update notification

2012-03-07 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi all Is there a way to be reliably notified when a table/array changes? My hope is that I don't know of some hidden feature. Is there any? It's easy to catch messages sent to [s arrayname]. However, it's not so easy when data is written through [tabwrite arrayname] or [tabwrite~ arrayname] or

Re: [PD] [table] update notification

2012-03-07 Thread batinste
Hi Rough approach : you could compare your array with the reference array by playing once from time to time the two simultaneously, sum (the first) and (the second *-1) and check with env~ that you still get nothing at the output. my 5*10^-7 cents. On 07/03/2012 09:55, Roman Haefeli wrote: Hi

Re: [PD] [table] update notification

2012-03-07 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 14:37 +0100, batinste wrote: Hi Rough approach : you could compare your array with the reference array by playing once from time to time the two simultaneously, sum (the first) and (the second *-1) and check with env~ that you still get nothing at the output. my

Re: [PD] [table] update notification

2012-03-07 Thread Pierre Massat
How about using [tabreceive~] with properly set blocksize in a subpatch? Never tried it though. Pierre. 2012/3/7 Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 14:37 +0100, batinste wrote: Hi Rough approach : you could compare your array with the reference array by playing once

Re: [PD] [table] update notification

2012-03-07 Thread Lorenzo Sutton
On 07/03/12 09:55, Roman Haefeli wrote: Hi all Is there a way to be reliably notified when a table/array changes? My hope is that I don't know of some hidden feature. Is there any? It's easy to catch messages sent to [s arrayname]. However, it's not so easy when data is written through

Re: [PD] [table] update notification

2012-03-07 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
when this happens. -Jonathan - Original Message - From: Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com To: pd-list pd-list@iem.at Cc: Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2012 3:55 AM Subject: [PD] [table] update notification Hi all Is there a way to be reliably notified when a table/array changes? My

Re: [PD] [table] update notification

2012-03-07 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
...@gmail.com To: pd-list pd-list@iem.at Cc: Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2012 3:55 AM Subject: [PD] [table] update notification Hi all Is there a way to be reliably notified when a table/array changes? My hope is that I don't know of some hidden feature. Is there any? It's easy to catch messages

Re: [PD] [table] update notification

2012-03-07 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com; pd-list pd-list@iem.at Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2012 1:52 PM Subject: Re: [PD] [table] update notification That would be nice to have as an outlet from an array.  Or perhaps the [table] object should have an outlet to get that info. .hc On Mar 7, 2012