>
>
> Jack a écrit :
>
>> About that, there is still an error in the gemhead example.
>> How can i correct this ? (if i can).
> i just did it
Ok, good !
++
Jack
> c
>
>> ++
>>
>> Jack
>>
>>
So higher values (-3) will be rendered before lower values (-10) ;)
>>> this one look better.
>>>
>>
Jack a écrit :
About that, there is still an error in the gemhead example.
How can i correct this ? (if i can).
i just did it
c
++
Jack
So higher values (-3) will be rendered before lower values (-10) ;)
this one look better.
c
++
Jack
cyrille
__
Le mercredi 14 octobre 2009 à 22:00 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit :
>
> Jack a écrit :
> > Le mercredi 14 octobre 2009 à 19:32 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit :
> >> IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
> >>
> >>> from [gemhead]s help-patch for negatvie render-orders: "Note, that
> >>> Higher values (-3) wil
Jack a écrit :
Le mercredi 14 octobre 2009 à 19:32 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit :
IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
from [gemhead]s help-patch for negatvie render-orders: "Note, that
Higher values (-3) will be rendered BEFORE higher values (-10)."
HIGHER values are rendered before HIGHER value?
Yes, the problem isnt the alpha or rotates... is the order of render for
working in many planes thanks a lot friends for the support.
Cheers from Chile
JOsé
2009/10/14 Jack
> Le mercredi 14 octobre 2009 à 19:32 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit :
> >
> > IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
> >
> >
Thanks brothers i am very happy with GEM. In the old times i use Jitter...
but Gem is powerfull i will upload a new videos
Thanks from Chile
José
2009/10/14 cyrille henry
>
>
> IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
>
> from [gemhead]s help-patch for negatvie render-orders: "Note, that
>> Hig
Le mercredi 14 octobre 2009 à 19:32 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit :
>
> IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
>
> > from [gemhead]s help-patch for negatvie render-orders: "Note, that
> > Higher values (-3) will be rendered BEFORE higher values (-10)."
>
> HIGHER values are rendered before HIGHER value???
IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
from [gemhead]s help-patch for negatvie render-orders: "Note, that
Higher values (-3) will be rendered BEFORE higher values (-10)."
HIGHER values are rendered before HIGHER value???
cyrille
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing
Hi,
if i use the gemhead with -1 [gemhead-1] then [gemhead -2] the gemhead
-2 is a background? i can work with alpha... but.. i want work like a
layer...
No it is not a 'background', if you want to work with backgrounds, you
have to displace your object using [translateXYZ] for example...
Jose Luis Santorcuato wrote:
> Dear friends i am working now with GEM, and i like use a lot of images and
> planes,the question... if i use the gemhead with -1 [gemhead-1] then
> [gemhead -2] the gemhead -2 is a background? i can work with alpha... but..
> i want work like a layer...
> Thanks a lo
Dear friends i am working now with GEM, and i like use a lot of images and
planes,the question... if i use the gemhead with -1 [gemhead-1] then
[gemhead -2] the gemhead -2 is a background? i can work with alpha... but..
i want work like a layer...
Thanks a lot
José
--
http://www.chilemigra.cl
h
11 matches
Mail list logo