Re: [PD] gemhead -1

2009-10-16 Thread jack
> > > Jack a écrit : > >> About that, there is still an error in the gemhead example. >> How can i correct this ? (if i can). > i just did it Ok, good ! ++ Jack > c > >> ++ >> >> Jack >> >> So higher values (-3) will be rendered before lower values (-10) ;) >>> this one look better. >>> >>

Re: [PD] gemhead -1

2009-10-15 Thread cyrille henry
Jack a écrit : About that, there is still an error in the gemhead example. How can i correct this ? (if i can). i just did it c ++ Jack So higher values (-3) will be rendered before lower values (-10) ;) this one look better. c ++ Jack cyrille __

Re: [PD] gemhead -1

2009-10-14 Thread Jack
Le mercredi 14 octobre 2009 à 22:00 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit : > > Jack a écrit : > > Le mercredi 14 octobre 2009 à 19:32 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit : > >> IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : > >> > >>> from [gemhead]s help-patch for negatvie render-orders: "Note, that > >>> Higher values (-3) wil

Re: [PD] gemhead -1

2009-10-14 Thread cyrille henry
Jack a écrit : Le mercredi 14 octobre 2009 à 19:32 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit : IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : from [gemhead]s help-patch for negatvie render-orders: "Note, that Higher values (-3) will be rendered BEFORE higher values (-10)." HIGHER values are rendered before HIGHER value?

Re: [PD] gemhead -1

2009-10-14 Thread Jose Luis Santorcuato
Yes, the problem isnt the alpha or rotates... is the order of render for working in many planes thanks a lot friends for the support. Cheers from Chile JOsé 2009/10/14 Jack > Le mercredi 14 octobre 2009 à 19:32 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit : > > > > IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : > > > >

Re: [PD] gemhead -1

2009-10-14 Thread Jose Luis Santorcuato
Thanks brothers i am very happy with GEM. In the old times i use Jitter... but Gem is powerfull i will upload a new videos Thanks from Chile José 2009/10/14 cyrille henry > > > IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : > > from [gemhead]s help-patch for negatvie render-orders: "Note, that >> Hig

Re: [PD] gemhead -1

2009-10-14 Thread Jack
Le mercredi 14 octobre 2009 à 19:32 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit : > > IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : > > > from [gemhead]s help-patch for negatvie render-orders: "Note, that > > Higher values (-3) will be rendered BEFORE higher values (-10)." > > HIGHER values are rendered before HIGHER value???

Re: [PD] gemhead -1

2009-10-14 Thread cyrille henry
IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : from [gemhead]s help-patch for negatvie render-orders: "Note, that Higher values (-3) will be rendered BEFORE higher values (-10)." HIGHER values are rendered before HIGHER value??? cyrille ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing

Re: [PD] gemhead -1

2009-10-14 Thread Pierre
Hi, if i use the gemhead with -1 [gemhead-1] then [gemhead -2] the gemhead -2 is a background? i can work with alpha... but.. i want work like a layer... No it is not a 'background', if you want to work with backgrounds, you have to displace your object using [translateXYZ] for example...

Re: [PD] gemhead -1

2009-10-14 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Jose Luis Santorcuato wrote: > Dear friends i am working now with GEM, and i like use a lot of images and > planes,the question... if i use the gemhead with -1 [gemhead-1] then > [gemhead -2] the gemhead -2 is a background? i can work with alpha... but.. > i want work like a layer... > Thanks a lo

[PD] gemhead -1

2009-10-13 Thread Jose Luis Santorcuato
Dear friends i am working now with GEM, and i like use a lot of images and planes,the question... if i use the gemhead with -1 [gemhead-1] then [gemhead -2] the gemhead -2 is a background? i can work with alpha... but.. i want work like a layer... Thanks a lot José -- http://www.chilemigra.cl h