Le 2011-11-15 à 11:36:00, Stephen Lucas a écrit :
I suspect Mathieu may have the right idea about the wraparound, but I'll
have to do more testing to be sure. Because of the scale of things, I
can't eyeball the exact problem and will probably need to make a
separate patch to clarify the proble
Basically, the bigger your multiplied patch is, the more memory and CPU it'll
need, and the longer it'll take to load. You can use [switch~] to turn off an
instance when its not in use.
.hc
On Nov 15, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Stephen Lucas wrote:
> I suspect Mathieu may have the right idea about t
I suspect Mathieu may have the right idea about the wraparound, but I'll
have to do more testing to be sure. Because of the scale of things, I can't
eyeball the exact problem and will probably need to make a separate patch
to clarify the problem.
'many' lib looks interesting for simplifying abstra
Have you checked out the 'many' lib? It includes a bunch of techniques for
creating 1000s of copies of abstractions.
http://puredata.info/downloads/many
When I've done this kind of thing involving tables, I generally try to make
only one soundfiler object load all of the tables. Or depending
Le 2011-11-13 à 01:27:00, Stephen Lucas a écrit :
I've experienced some anomalies with dynamically creating objects into
this much Y space, which at something like maybe 5 pixels, I'm
getting some sort of wraparound, which oddly enough, is wrapping back to
25000 or so pixels. After the wra
This may have come up before, but I didn't see a clear answer to this on
searches.
I've been doing more work involving the dynamic creation of abstractions
numbering greater than 1000; these involve using [soundfiler], so I've been
putting [del 1] between each creation message. This may be extrane
An example:http://vimeo.com/9447773
On 14 February 2010 18:35, Ben Baker-Smith wrote:
> Thanks to the both of you. I haven't checked out the forum patch yet
> (I will), but the help browser page (1.msg_and_patch) is exactly what
> I was looking for.
>
> -Ben
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 5:59 AM,
Thanks to the both of you. I haven't checked out the forum patch yet
(I will), but the help browser page (1.msg_and_patch) is exactly what
I was looking for.
-Ben
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Marco Donnarumma wrote:
> Sorry if you already took a look at those patches, but you might want to
Hallo,
Ben Baker-Smith hat gesagt: // Ben Baker-Smith wrote:
> I know this has been addressed a few times on the list in past years,
> but I couldn't find any concrete instructions.. so, here's my
> question. What is the best way to approach dynamic object creation?
> I'm hoping that there are so
Sorry if you already took a look at those patches, but you might want to
check the Pd browser > manuals/ > pd-msg/ > 1.msg_and_patch/
M
> Hello List,
>
> I know this has been addressed a few times on the list in past years,
> but I couldn't find any concrete instructions.. so, here's my
> que
Hi Ben,
If i m not mistaken someone on the Pd forum managed to do this in a set of
patches he posted here :
http://puredata.hurleur.com/sujet-3625-pdlive
There is a main patch from which you choose which objects to add to a
secondary patch. I couldn't tell you exactly how he did that, but it didn'
Hello List,
I know this has been addressed a few times on the list in past years,
but I couldn't find any concrete instructions.. so, here's my
question. What is the best way to approach dynamic object creation?
I'm hoping that there are some messages that can create instances of
abstractions or
12 matches
Mail list logo