Re: [PD] KMI SoftStep foot controller?
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 10:33 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2014-03-09 14:15, Roman Haefeli wrote: > >> k ... for me [packOSC] didn't work with [netsend], I didn't > >> investigate why but > >>> just used [udpsend] instead. > > [netsend] is different from [udpsend] and [tcpsend] in that it > > sends incoming Pd (list/any) messages as FUDI. The latter two > > expect lists of bytes (list of numbers between 0 and 255). > > [packOSC] outputs OSC packets represented as lists of bytes and > > thus is designed to transported by either [udpsend] or [tcpsend], > > but not [netsend]. > > well, starting with Pd-0.45 [netsend] has support for binary data, > which makes it compatible with [udpsend]. > you have to pass it the "-b" switch though, so > [udpsend] == [netsend -u -b] > [tcpsend] == [netsend -b] Oh, good to know. Thanks for the update. Roman ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] KMI SoftStep foot controller?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-03-09 14:15, Roman Haefeli wrote: >> k ... for me [packOSC] didn't work with [netsend], I didn't >> investigate why but >>> just used [udpsend] instead. > [netsend] is different from [udpsend] and [tcpsend] in that it > sends incoming Pd (list/any) messages as FUDI. The latter two > expect lists of bytes (list of numbers between 0 and 255). > [packOSC] outputs OSC packets represented as lists of bytes and > thus is designed to transported by either [udpsend] or [tcpsend], > but not [netsend]. well, starting with Pd-0.45 [netsend] has support for binary data, which makes it compatible with [udpsend]. you have to pass it the "-b" switch though, so [udpsend] == [netsend -u -b] [tcpsend] == [netsend -b] gfmdasr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTHYbdAAoJELZQGcR/ejb4T1QP/0uOBXE18IewHTufIKIqV0yZ 7K0dcDRW16MsATSPeGcv2nBU+UAls5dzZrI9Nkg7KPd7vBrooYQPWNs9MJAwTAja p/jHMFRHL6EGU9VRhDPO60L4o4zSu2UOOA2X2dbx57P2gdAaFBVla8/DnkpuEfAf OO00Y2PY5jub9HaTLpCsXU2x4YQL4/EKK+skr2qvVguSn6zIVmVLIPjY/Q1ImjyD Fc3Pxmy/+V920/Tk8pwQ5Bwh/cI1mfGMx+cYKuoOPioBe4zOcSuUWe5pkaK+Nhbf LBHEJK1vhawwnGTaKrBUVDa4Uifui2rsIRJReC7HCeeTHXy0clcJA93ar6dkXBEu tpzq2QiWnXXLmMN+Yn2RD4Z7ReOdRMg1Qureia3KmzIu2BZekPt4eoLVSoPKvvPf qNAA3+luoPA7UTBQhxPtk1SBnRnwbsXrByWs7dQoT5d4aEfjXQsAhH1kpme+7+E2 UpeAPpoIyI03DHYId1TbBFpeZGy2ZtfhflueQmjpQ41fUUEE3NINxYr0AiqatowU bF2ZW/AK9GDGpw9NZxEazbPsz+VgYC1lS/WsXzMY4UYms1nYxEjXDnjAqE/omCCe bKRHD4i7ipEs6rthh+AZ14MNAJOk0K1V2izyGgkGEAJANtvWGV9JdEYr5IiuJHwo Atn8bd7M6YyfNnAA0U4K =eYgf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] KMI SoftStep foot controller?
On Son, 2014-03-09 at 22:52 +1100, Simon Wise wrote: > On 09/03/14 02:58, Jonghyun Kim wrote: > > For OSC connection, you can also [netsend] with tcp, [netsend -u] with udp > > > > My experience was [netsend] is a little better than others. > > Ok ... for me [packOSC] didn't work with [netsend], I didn't investigate why > but > just used [udpsend] instead. [netsend] is different from [udpsend] and [tcpsend] in that it sends incoming Pd (list/any) messages as FUDI. The latter two expect lists of bytes (list of numbers between 0 and 255). [packOSC] outputs OSC packets represented as lists of bytes and thus is designed to transported by either [udpsend] or [tcpsend], but not [netsend]. Roman ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] KMI SoftStep foot controller?
On 09/03/14 02:58, Jonghyun Kim wrote: For OSC connection, you can also [netsend] with tcp, [netsend -u] with udp My experience was [netsend] is a little better than others. Ok ... for me [packOSC] didn't work with [netsend], I didn't investigate why but just used [udpsend] instead. Simon ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] KMI SoftStep foot controller?
For OSC connection, you can also [netsend] with tcp, [netsend -u] with udp My experience was [netsend] is a little better than others. On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Simon Wise wrote: > On 08/03/14 21:13, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > >> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Simon Wise wrote: >> >> On 08/03/14 06:24, Jonghyun Kim wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Chris for the answer! I was worried about compatibility with Pd. How about OSC function with Pd? It's OSC works with [netsend] or [udpsend]? >>> [your OSC message( >>> | >>> [packOSC] >>> | >>> [udpsend] >>> >>> You'll have to explicitly import the mrpeach library, use [import >> mrpeach] >> > > you are right, or use [osc/packOSC] and [iemnet/udpsend] for these ones .. > > > >> >>> pd-osc: /usr/lib/pd/extra/osc/packOSC.pd_linux >>> pd-iemnet: /usr/lib/pd/extra/iemnet/udpsend.pd_linux >>> >> > > Simon > > ___ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list > ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] KMI SoftStep foot controller?
On 08/03/14 21:13, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Simon Wise wrote: On 08/03/14 06:24, Jonghyun Kim wrote: Thanks Chris for the answer! I was worried about compatibility with Pd. How about OSC function with Pd? It's OSC works with [netsend] or [udpsend]? [your OSC message( | [packOSC] | [udpsend] You'll have to explicitly import the mrpeach library, use [import mrpeach] you are right, or use [osc/packOSC] and [iemnet/udpsend] for these ones .. pd-osc: /usr/lib/pd/extra/osc/packOSC.pd_linux pd-iemnet: /usr/lib/pd/extra/iemnet/udpsend.pd_linux Simon ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] KMI SoftStep foot controller?
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Simon Wise wrote: > On 08/03/14 06:24, Jonghyun Kim wrote: > >> Thanks Chris for the answer! I was worried about compatibility with Pd. >> >> How about OSC function with Pd? It's OSC works with [netsend] or >> [udpsend]? >> > > [your OSC message( > | > [packOSC] > | > [udpsend] > You'll have to explicitly import the mrpeach library, use [import mrpeach] > > pd-osc: /usr/lib/pd/extra/osc/packOSC.pd_linux > pd-iemnet: /usr/lib/pd/extra/iemnet/udpsend.pd_linux > > > Simon > > > ___ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list > ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] KMI SoftStep foot controller?
On 08/03/14 06:24, Jonghyun Kim wrote: Thanks Chris for the answer! I was worried about compatibility with Pd. How about OSC function with Pd? It's OSC works with [netsend] or [udpsend]? [your OSC message( | [packOSC] | [udpsend] pd-osc: /usr/lib/pd/extra/osc/packOSC.pd_linux pd-iemnet: /usr/lib/pd/extra/iemnet/udpsend.pd_linux Simon ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] KMI SoftStep foot controller?
Hi list, I think the SoftStep with Pd for live performance. Has anyone experienced the SoftStep with Pure Data? It can be a good solution for live situation with Pd? I think SoftStep one, not a 2nd edition. First edition is cheaper than 2nd. http://www.keithmcmillen.com/softstep Thanks, Jong ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
