On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:50:51PM +, Mark Sexton wrote:
Hi
I need PD to make simple but accurate calculations for a sonification
project. However there seems to be a problem working accurately with floats
that have 7 or more digits in total (before or after the decimal point). PD
Mark Sexton wrote:
Hi
I need PD to make simple but accurate calculations for a sonification
project. However there seems to be a problem working accurately with floats
that have 7 or more digits in total (before or after the decimal point). PD
always seem to round the figure to 6 digits
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 09:45 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Mark Sexton wrote:
Hi
I need PD to make simple but accurate calculations for a sonification
project. However there seems to be a problem working accurately with floats
that have 7 or more digits in total (before or after the
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 09:45:32AM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Mark Sexton wrote:
Hi
I need PD to make simple but accurate calculations for a sonification
project. However there seems to be a problem working accurately with floats
that have 7 or more digits in total (before or
Simon Wise wrote:
On 7 Nov 2008, at 5:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually i have thought if pd could be ported to use double precision?
may be optionaly so if your machine is meant to be fast enough then
you
opt doubles ..
is it quite doable?
what is the new situation with 64-bit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 09:45:32AM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Mark Sexton wrote:
Hi
I need PD to make simple but accurate calculations for a sonification
project. However there seems to be a problem working accurately with floats
that have 7 or more digits
On 7 Nov 2008, at 5:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually i have thought if pd could be ported to use double precision?
may be optionaly so if your machine is meant to be fast enough then
you
opt doubles ..
is it quite doable?
what is the new situation with 64-bit compatible pd in
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Simon Wise wrote:
On 7 Nov 2008, at 5:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually i have thought if pd could be ported to use double precision?
may be optionaly so if your machine is meant to be fast enough then
you
opt doubles ..
is it quite doable?
what is the
I've had the 6-digit problem trying to print UTM position coordinates
out of Pd.
If you know the range of your numbers, there are some ugly hacks that
provide a limited solution.
Eg, for 1234.5678 you can pass the number through [int] and then
subtract that from the original number to get
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 10:21:19AM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
there has been quite some code added to Pd-0.42 in preperation to make
single/double precision a compile-time option.
that's the way forward ;_)
i think the only major thing that is still missing for a fully
functional
Hi
I need PD to make simple but accurate calculations for a sonification project.
However there seems to be a problem working accurately with floats that have 7
or more digits in total (before or after the decimal point). PD always seem to
round the figure to 6 digits whether in a calculation,
11 matches
Mail list logo
