Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-06 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 08:35 +0100, Jordi Sala wrote: hi, I've done a very simple test, and it works fine! https://vimeo.com/37914564 Cool! Thanks for that. (Solely from watching the video, it's hard to judge whether everything is working as expected. I assume, you were able more easily

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Mar 4, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 22:27 -0800, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I would prefer that you use a different name unless you are interested in providing strict compatibility with the current Pduino. Yes, actually I'm interested. Things

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-06 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 10:56 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Mar 4, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: Actually [zexy/makesymbol] wasn't ever used in [arduino], only in arduino-help.pd . There it's used to display the Firmware version in a GOP cnv object - [zexy/makesymbol

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-06 Thread Jordi Sala
yes, it works fine! On 6 March 2012 17:12, Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 10:56 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Mar 4, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: Actually [zexy/makesymbol] wasn't ever used in [arduino], only in arduino-help.pd . There

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-04 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 22:27 -0800, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I would prefer that you use a different name unless you are interested in providing strict compatibility with the current Pduino. Yes, actually I'm interested. Things like using namespace prefixes are one example of

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-04 Thread Jordi Sala
hi, I've done a very simple test, and it works fine! https://vimeo.com/37914564 On 4 March 2012 15:45, Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 22:27 -0800, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I would prefer that you use a different name unless you are interested in

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi Hans On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 08:55 -0800, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I'm happy to see you working on this. Since you are making a new version, perhaps it makes sense to change the names. Like maybe it makes sense to change the object from [arduino] to [firmata]? That's something I

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-03 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
It won't really be a fork since I plan on making one more release, then I'm unlikely to touch the code again. So really, your development will be the active development. I would prefer that you use a different name unless you are interested in providing strict compatibility with the current

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-02 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Hey Roman, I'm happy to see you working on this. Since you are making a new version, perhaps it makes sense to change the names. Like maybe it makes sense to change the object from [arduino] to [firmata]? That's something I thought about doing in the past. This would also make it easier

[PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-02-28 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi all An improved version of [arduino] and its help patch is ready for testing and commenting. There is also a new [arduino-gui] class, that graphically emulates an Arduino board and is supposed to be very easy to use, especially for beginners. Get it from here:

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-02-28 Thread Pierre Massat
Sweet! I'll take some time, probably this week-end, to test it with my setup. Pierre. 2012/2/28 Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com Hi all An improved version of [arduino] and its help patch is ready for testing and commenting. There is also a new [arduino-gui] class, that graphically

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-02-28 Thread Richie Cyngler
Sounds great Roman, I have a gig tomorrow night so I don't want to mess with my setup right now. But I'll definitely give it whirl after that. Thanks! On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Pierre Massat pimas...@gmail.com wrote: Sweet! I'll take some time, probably this week-end, to test it with