[PD] Unusual Gem behaviour

[Andrew Faraday]

Hey all, I've enclosed a motionblur based patch I've been working on. For some 
odd reason [rotateXYZ] seems to be taking arguments for speed of rotation 
instead of an absolute position (when applied to a square containing 
pix_motionblur). Although I am basing that on the appearance of the blur. Any 
ideas what's going on, guys?  
_
Tell us your greatest, weirdest and funniest Hotmail stories
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/

unsure.pd
Description: Binary data
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Unusual Gem behaviour

[cyrille henry]

hello,

the feedback is making this impression, but if you remove it, you'll see that 
rotate work like expected.
c


Andrew Faraday a écrit :
Hey all, I've enclosed a motionblur based patch I've been working on. 
For some odd reason [rotateXYZ] seems to be taking arguments for speed 
of rotation instead of an absolute position (when applied to a square 
containing pix_motionblur). Although I am basing that on the appearance 
of the blur. Any ideas what's going on, guys?


We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell 
us now http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/





___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list