Hi,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:36:25PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On 03/12/2012 06:06 PM, yvan volochine wrote:
On 03/12/2012 02:54 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
IMHO, [routeOSC] should accept these two as the same thing:
[/bla/1/blabli 0.437(
[list /bla/1/blabli 0.437(
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 09:11 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:36:25PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On 03/12/2012 06:06 PM, yvan volochine wrote:
On 03/12/2012 02:54 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
IMHO, [routeOSC] should accept these two as the same
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:02:01AM +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
You're not convinced of what now?
Sorry for the unclarity: I'm not convinced of the recent change in [routeOSC],
I think, it would work fine accepting list-messages as well as proper
OSC-meta-messages.
The proposal is
Hi Frank
Though I lack to see the necessity to change [routeOSC]'s current
behaviour, I agree that it most likely wouldn't cause any harm.
Roman
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 11:17 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:02:01AM +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
You're not
Hi Roman,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:19:59PM +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
Though I lack to see the necessity to change [routeOSC]'s current
behaviour, I agree that it most likely wouldn't cause any harm.
As I understand it, this topic only came up because apparently the behaviour
has been
On 03/13/2012 07:12 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Though I lack to see the necessity to change [routeOSC]'s current
behaviour, I agree that it most likely wouldn't cause any harm.
As I understand it, this topic only came up because apparently the behaviour
has been changed in the newest release
Well it was simple enough to implement. The newest [routeOSC] in svn
should handle lists and messages the same, even though you shouldn't be
using lists ;)
Also any non-OSC messages will be sent through the rightmost outlet.
Martin
On 2012-03-13 12:14, yvan volochine wrote:
On 03/13/2012
hello folks,
apparently [routeOSC] behaves differently between 42.5 and 43.1 releases
(I'm aware mrpeach has been updated in between).
I have sliders sending out messages as
[list /bla/1/blabli 0.437(
with Pd-extended 0.42.5 and the related older mrpeach lib, I used to
route these messages with
On 2012-03-12 14:35, Marco Donnarumma wrote:
hello folks,
apparently [routeOSC] behaves differently between 42.5 and 43.1 releases
(I'm aware mrpeach has been updated in between).
I have sliders sending out messages as
[list /bla/1/blabli 0.437(
with Pd-extended 0.42.5 and the related older
On 03/12/2012 03:50 PM, Martin Peach wrote:
On 2012-03-12 14:35, Marco Donnarumma wrote:
hello folks,
apparently [routeOSC] behaves differently between 42.5 and 43.1 releases
(I'm aware mrpeach has been updated in between).
I have sliders sending out messages as
[list /bla/1/blabli 0.437(
Great, thanks for the clear and concise explanation.
I thought I must have been wrong :)
M
- was I doing something wrong before?
I think so. [routeOSC] expects messages whose selector is an OSC path. If
it worked before with list selector it was by accident, because routeOSC
used to have
On 03/12/2012 02:54 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
IMHO, [routeOSC] should accept these two as the same thing:
[/bla/1/blabli 0.437(
[list /bla/1/blabli 0.437(
It'll make life easier for a lot of people, and I can't see any
disadvantage in that setup.
well, in pd in general, [list foo
On 03/12/2012 06:06 PM, yvan volochine wrote:
On 03/12/2012 02:54 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
IMHO, [routeOSC] should accept these two as the same thing:
[/bla/1/blabli 0.437(
[list /bla/1/blabli 0.437(
It'll make life easier for a lot of people, and I can't see any
disadvantage in
- Original Message -
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at
To: yvan volochine yvan...@gmail.com
Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] mrpeach routeOSC behaves differently then its previous
release?
On 03/12/2012 06:06 PM, yvan
On 03/12/2012 07:04 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at
To: yvan volochine yvan...@gmail.com
Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] mrpeach routeOSC behaves differently then its
Le 2012-03-12 à 18:36:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
I personally think it would be great to get rid of the separation
between lists and non-list messages (i.e. lists of atoms that start with
a symbol other than list). But that's a big project that will break
backwards compatibility.
Le 2012-03-12 à 22:30:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
Donno. That particular rule has always felt arbitrary to me. I don't
think I've ever run into a case where there was an empty list being used
as a bang.
Currently, [t a] turns every bang into an empty list, but whenever you try
to
- Original Message -
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: yvan volochine yvan...@gmail.com; pd-list pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] mrpeach routeOSC behaves differently then its previous
release
On 2012-03-12 22:49, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Le 2012-03-12 à 18:36:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
I personally think it would be great to get rid of the separation
between lists and non-list messages (i.e. lists of atoms that start
with a symbol other than list). But that's a big project
- Original Message -
From: Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
To: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at
Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] mrpeach routeOSC behaves differently then its previous
release?
Le 2012-03-12 à 18:36:00
20 matches
Mail list logo
