On Oct 9, 2010, at 11:08 PM, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
ola,
this doesn't really answer to the 2 main questions :
* will pure:dyne and pd-extended debian packages
will be compatible ? ( i doubt it ),
if so why make the work twice?
I hope they will be compatible, but that's up to the
ola,
There is no one saying we have to abandon any of the libraries that
are included in Pd-extended.
you published a list of abandonned libraries...
I am saying that I cannot keep up with all of the maintenance of all
of the libraries that I currently maintain in Pd-extended.
that's a
ola again,
anyway people could be surprised that we speak of Debian packaging
when the original subject of this thread was pd for Mac OSX..
so what will be the future policy of pd-extended
for Mac OSX now?
saludos,
sevy
ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
ola,
There is no one saying we have to
From my point of view, if libraries are going to be bundled with Pd-
extended, then that library needs to be included in Debian. My
development effort is to making it easy for people to make,
distribute, and install their own libraries, so they don't need to be
included in Pd-extended to
ola,
this doesn't really answer to the 2 main questions :
* will pure:dyne and pd-extended debian packages
will be compatible ? ( i doubt it ),
if so why make the work twice?
* how will you install pd-extended on Mac OSX ?
i don't get the future of pd-extended,
i'm already lost enough in all
On Oct 6, 2010, at 10:07 PM, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
Simon Wise wrote:
On 06/10/10 21:07, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:00 PM, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
ola,
You can see which Pd libraries people are working on
ola,
i will from now on encourage people
to use pd packages from pure:dyne,
because they are more complete, tested ..
yeh i forgot to give the right link here :
https://launchpad.net/~puredyne-team/+archive/ppa?field.series_filter=karmic
( thanks aymeric )
all will be ported to lucid soon,
ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:00 PM, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
ola,
You can see which Pd libraries people are working on adding to
Debian here, they all start with pd-*:
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/being_packaged
that's what i mean, i
On 06/10/10 21:07, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:00 PM, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
ola,
You can see which Pd libraries people are working on adding to
Debian here, they all start with pd-*:
Simon Wise wrote:
On 06/10/10 21:07, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:00 PM, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
ola,
You can see which Pd libraries people are working on adding to
Debian here, they all start with pd-*:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2010 04:53 AM, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
pd-pdp is in already, right?
no
if you mess up with :
pd-pddp: a support library for the Pure Data Documentation Project
http://bugs.debian.org/591732, 61 days in preparation.
how about:
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 22:07 +0200, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
but obviously the intention is to abandon some libraries
That is certainly not true. You're looking from the wrong perspective.
It's not the case that someone decides _not_ to include certain
libraries, it's more that some people
ola,
that's exactly the worst possible answer...
do it yourself and the author of pd-extended
will get the credits..
no thank you, pure:dyne seems very honest to me
furthermore i have many other things to do ... so, just not
wasting more time with pd-extended
ciao,
sevy
Roman Haefeli
Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 22:07 +0200, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
but obviously the intention is to abandon some libraries
That is certainly not true. You're looking from the wrong perspective.
It's not the case that someone decides _not_ to include certain
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:00 PM, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
ola,
You can see which Pd libraries people are working on adding to
Debian here, they all start with pd-*:
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/being_packaged
that's what i mean, i don't see unauthorized,
15 matches
Mail list logo
