On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Whatever it is, the distinction between compiler and interpreter has
been blurred a lot over the year: e.g. the Python "interpreter" compiles
code and saves it to disk, and also interprets the "compiled" code.
Typo, I meant over the years. Not much
I think I understand now. This is quite a bit more complicated than I
had thought at first.
> Have I missed the point entirely?
http://claudiusmaximus.goto10.org/gallery/coding/hsext/first-non-trivial.png
The middle window in the top row is the entire source for the object.
hsext provides th
Charles Henry wrote:
Maybe I'm missing the point here, but isn't Haskell a compiled (not
interpreted) language?
There are a variety of compilers and interpreters.
> We can add any compiled function, wrapped in a
C-written external, just so long as we have the symbols for the
function from th
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Charles Henry wrote:
Maybe I'm missing the point here, but isn't Haskell a compiled (not
interpreted) language?
It's either. Whether a language is compiled or interpreted, is dependent
on compilers and interpreters. There even exists a C interpreter. For
Haskell, I think
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jan 6, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Tim Blechmann wrote:
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 17:25 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The loader is the final piece in the puzzle that was preventing
people from writing native objects in other languages.
The lack of
That sounds about right. But having a Pd API in the native language
would be nicer.
.hc
On Jan 6, 2007, at 9:39 PM, Charles Henry wrote:
Maybe I'm missing the point here, but isn't Haskell a compiled (not
interpreted) language? We can add any compiled function, wrapped in a
C-written ext
On Jan 6, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Tim Blechmann wrote:
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 17:25 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The loader is the final piece in the puzzle that was preventing
people from writing native objects in other languages.
because people were to lazy to type an additional word into
Maybe I'm missing the point here, but isn't Haskell a compiled (not
interpreted) language? We can add any compiled function, wrapped in a
C-written external, just so long as we have the symbols for the
function from the binary.
*OR* we can write an external in some funky language, so long as we
c
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Thomas Grill wrote:
Am 07.01.2007 um 01:20 schrieb Mathieu Bouchard:
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The loader is the final piece in the puzzle that was preventing people
from writing native objects in other languages.
Now it doesn't look like you are just
Am 07.01.2007 um 01:20 schrieb Mathieu Bouchard:
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The loader is the final piece in the puzzle that was preventing
people from writing native objects in other languages.
Now it doesn't look like you are just being innocently mistaken, it
lo
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The loader is the final piece in the puzzle that was preventing people from
writing native objects in other languages.
Now it doesn't look like you are just being innocently mistaken, it looks
like a deliberate lie.
_ _ __ ___ _ ___
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Tim Blechmann wrote:
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 17:25 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The loader is the final piece in the puzzle that was preventing
people from writing native objects in other languages.
because people were to lazy to type an additional word into an object
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 17:25 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> The loader is the final piece in the puzzle that was preventing
> people from writing native objects in other languages.
because people were to lazy to type an additional word into an object
box?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ:
On Jan 6, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Have you seen the "loader" functionality? If you made this into a
Haskell loader, then you could write native Pd objects in Haskell.
Claude has already written a pd object class in Haskel
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Have you seen the "loader" functionality? If you made this into a
Haskell loader, then you could write native Pd objects in Haskell.
Claude has already written a pd object class in Haskell.
Now, will you stop claiming that the loader function
Have you seen the "loader" functionality? If you made this into a
Haskell loader, then you could write native Pd objects in Haskell.
There is the CLR loader and API, which is a complete example.
.hc
On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:43 AM, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Download here:
http://devel.go
Download here:
http://devel.goto10.org/listing.php?repname=maximus&path=%2Fhsext%2F&rev=0&sc=0
Caveats:
1. only one instance of [hsext]
2. only one inlet for a single float
3. only one outlet for a single float
4. only one hardcoded stateless function from float to float
5. probably a nightmare
17 matches
Mail list logo
