Hi Alexandre,
What do you want me to check?
If comb~ and teeth~ are so close, one wonders why there are two objects
at all. In hindsight, the early development of objects in Max/MSP
doesn't look very organized. Almost like the pd-extended collection :-).
Greetings,
Fred Jan
On 2015-06-25
What do you want me to check?
I was just more curious to see if you understood the similarities between
comb~ and teeth~ since it seemed you were still in doubt on how it behaved.
Did you see that comb~ has also two delay lines?
If comb~ and teeth~ are so close, one
wonders why there are two
Yep, cheers Pall
On 24 June 2015 at 16:04, Pall Thayer pallt...@gmail.com wrote:
Julian, it sounds like you're looking at the debugger in the browser. Look
at the console and use the console.log() function to give you a better idea
of what's going on.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:35 AM s p
I'm not sure, but I think that's not a problem... I dound something about
that here:
http://www.dependencywalker.com/faq.html
(third question in the FAQ).
But meanwhile, is it still the case that wish85.exe can't run on a pristine
windows XP machine??? There must be something else not
IESHIMS.DLL
WER.DLL
Hi, many messages through the web about Dependency Walker are reporting
that these can be safely ignored (and some other always flagged as missing,
regardless of tested binary)
Cheers
Nicolas
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing
Well, I'm pretty sure that neither wish85 nor Pd will run without at least
the dlls shipped in pd/bin. I'm at a loss to figure out for sure what other
DLLs must be present as well. It looks like I'd better install a pristine
Windows XP myself - I've asked at school if they have one handy,
On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 21:56 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
I take it you have some way to un-install the MSVC 2008 Redistributable
Package so that you were able to get the new test version of Pd to fail to
run... if so can you repeat Roman's experiment, launch wish85.exe on the
command lie
