Re: [PD] moog

hm, there's also a [resofilt~] object in extended that implements moog filtering ;) 2015-01-14 1:44 GMT-02:00 Alexandre Torres Porres : > well, maybe I got excited too soon, not much else shows up in the paper > that can be related to the moog code... > > Well, I tried making a first draft in a p

Re: [PD] moog

well, maybe I got excited too soon, not much else shows up in the paper that can be related to the moog code... Well, I tried making a first draft in a patch of what the code seems to be for me. You can find it attached if someone else cares to collaborate. But it is now getting quite mysterious/w

Re: [PD] moog

> Seems mostly to be definitely it! Yeah, thanks! Mostly coz the paper mentions zeros at 0.3 - and you can easily see that in the code ;) this seems to be getting less mysterious to implement, weee 2015-01-13 23:52 GMT-02:00 Alexandre Torres Porres : > > This is probably the source for Gunter's

Re: [PD] moog

> This is probably the source for Gunter's Moog VCF Seems mostly to be definitely it! Yeah, thanks! 2015-01-13 23:48 GMT-02:00 Chris Clepper : > This is probably the source for Gunter's Moog VCF: > > https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~stilti/papers/moogvcf.pdf > > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:37 PM, A

Re: [PD] moog

This is probably the source for Gunter's Moog VCF: https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~stilti/papers/moogvcf.pdf On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > Howdy, so David, kinda getting back from my break, thought I'd have > anohter look at this... > > Seems the extended objec

Re: [PD] moog

Howdy, so David, kinda getting back from my break, thought I'd have anohter look at this... Seems the extended object is related to the 2004 Huovalainen paper, but I've failed to fully understand the code of moog.c and really match them. Anyone knows about Gunter's wherabouts these days? He could

Re: [PD] moog

Yes please! Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com > On Dec 31, 2014, at 4:43 PM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > I'd like to understand pd's [moog~] object one day, and implement it with > [fexpr~] or something.

Re: [PD] moog

Sorry, I was thinking of one that Miller wrote that I saw sometime back. I haven't actually looked at the one on extended. I will check it out. Let's stay in touch about this. It sounds like a fun project. happy new year On 12/31/2014 02:11 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > Miller (being

Re: [PD] moog

> Miller (being the author) would know better But the [moog~] object that I see here on Pd extended was written by gunter Geiger. > it would be super cool to have this as a Pd > abstraction rather than an extern. Dan Wilcox also wanted that as I remember. If you care to help me we could try and

Re: [PD] moog

Cool, I will definitely check out this SC object. Thanks for that. Miller (being the author) would know better than I of course, but I believe the way that [moog~] works is to use Runge-Kutta to solve the ordinary differential equation that governs each stage of the filter in its continuous ti

Re: [PD] moog

Hi David, > It'd certainly be interesting to see an what actual implementation > of this does, rather than just some matlab plots. An actual implementation is provided in the MoogFF filter in Super Collider, you can just download and try it out. The code of the object is also provided somewhere,

Re: [PD] moog

I believe, though I may be wrong, that the Moog vcf object is based on the algorithm described in the 2004 Huovalainen paper (citation [6] in the Fontana): http://www.mirlab.org/conference_papers/International_Conference/DAFx%202004/Proc/P_061.pdf I am a little confused here (in the Fontana) b

[PD] moog

hi, do you know if the moog object comes from this paper? http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/p/pod/dod-idx/preserving-the-structure-of-the-moog-vcf-in-the-digital.pdf?c=icmc;idno=bbp2372.2007.062 ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-m