2017-04-21 13:30 GMT-03:00 Ed Kelly via Pd-list :
> At the back of my mind, a thought that there must be a vanilla way of
> doing this. "I'm sure I saw it somewhere..." etc
> Just as with the [text] objects, I'm gradually emerging from years of
> using Pd-extended 0.42/43
You know about [array get] and [array set], do you?
Roman
On Fre, 2017-04-21 at 15:02 +, Ed Kelly via Pd-list wrote:
> compiled objects for maxlib/arraycopy
>
> _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
>
> For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research,
> go to
compiled objects for maxlib/arraycopy
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to
http://sharktracks.co.uk
On Friday, 21 April 2017, 15:53, Ed Kelly wrote:
Correction - I mean it assumed the
Correction - I mean it assumed the destination had to be bigger or the same
size as the source!
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to
http://sharktracks.co.uk
On Friday, 21 April 2017, 14:17, Ed Kelly via Pd-list
Perfect. A way of doing it in Vanilla Pd. If I can gradually trim away the
externals from my patches and vanillarize them I'll be a happy man.Thanks,Ed
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to
http://sharktracks.co.uk
On
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 18:48 +, Ed Kelly via Pd-list wrote:
> Does anyone have a better way of copying chunks from one array into
> another? Is there a vanilla way?
Checkout help for new [array] class. There is [array get ] for
retrieving part of or whole array as a list. With [array set ]