Re: [PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.53-1test1 released

2022-12-12 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
hey, thanks for merging documentations today :) really glad it made it ;) Still inspired by my work with the documentation, I found a couple of issues with [sigmund~] that are in conflict to what we have in its help file and I have a PR for it. One commit prevents reading a table when not

Re: [PD] is [sigmund~] a "phase vocoder"?

2022-12-12 Thread Sebastian Shader via Pd-list
on the subject of oscillator banks, someone said that this method where you use oversampling and incrementingthe phase of a specific sample in the block can be more efficient than just using separate oscillators (inspired by a characterization from one of miller's

Re: [PD] [date] and [time] in vanilla, was [random] and seed value

2022-12-12 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
sure, I got it that you need it for another case ;) Em seg., 12 de dez. de 2022 às 15:11, Dan Wilcox escreveu: > Actually, what I meant is that I'd like a date/time object in vanilla in > general, not because I need it for a random seed, but because I generate > time stamp strings for

[PD] [date] and [time] in vanilla, was [random] and seed value

2022-12-12 Thread Dan Wilcox
Actually, what I meant is that I'd like a date/time object in vanilla in general, not because I need it for a random seed, but because I generate time stamp strings for recordings. > On Dec 12, 2022, at 7:07 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > Vanilla could also have something like

Re: [PD] [random] and seed value

2022-12-12 Thread Philip Stone via Pd-list
Hello all, I don’t think anybody is advocating for this, but I just wanted to be sure that whatever changes are made to [random], the ‘seed’ message capability is maintained. My music very much depends on the ability to control the seed value and get a repeatable ‘random’ sequence. Where I

Re: [PD] is [sigmund~] a "phase vocoder"?

2022-12-12 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
haha :) Sure, I know her, but it's just an oscillator bank and it's awesome! The technical question still remains whether it can be called a 'phase vocoder' cheers Em seg., 12 de dez. de 2022 às 13:43, Peter P. escreveu: > * Alexandre Torres Porres [2022-12-12 17:23]: > > Hi, just get things

Re: [PD] is [sigmund~] a "phase vocoder"?

2022-12-12 Thread Peter P.
* Alexandre Torres Porres [2022-12-12 17:23]: > Hi, just get things straight and confirmed, for quite a while now I have > included [sigmund~] into a "phase vocoder" section of my tutorial. > > I never check and I'm just guessing it uses what is called "phase vocoder > analysis" to find accurate

[PD] is [sigmund~] a "phase vocoder"?

2022-12-12 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
Hi, just get things straight and confirmed, for quite a while now I have included [sigmund~] into a "phase vocoder" section of my tutorial. I never check and I'm just guessing it uses what is called "phase vocoder analysis" to find accurate pitches and that can be used in a bank of oscillators

Re: [PD] sonogram abstraction idea with data structures.

2022-12-12 Thread Pierre Alexandre Tremblay
Ah ok. I’ll get coding over Christmas then :) > On 12 Dec 2022, at 09:04, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > On 12/12/22 09:58, Pierre Alexandre Tremblay wrote: >> and I’m waiting for the new gui interface hinted at > > if you mean the thing i think you mean, then: don't. > > gmfasdr > IOhannes >

Re: [PD] sonogram abstraction idea with data structures.

2022-12-12 Thread Pierre Alexandre Tremblay
Data structures get super slow with a few hundred items. For instance, I will have to recode in C our fluid.plotter (and I’m waiting for the new gui interface hinted at) because it gets sluggish… I love the struct paradigm for smaller sets but when you hit 15k points, which is easy in