Torres Porres mailto:por...@gmail.com>>
> To: Patco mailto:colet.patr...@gmail.com>>
> Cc: Miller Puckette <mailto:mpucke...@cloud.ucsd.edu>>, pd-list@lists.iem.at
> <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>
> Subject: Re: [PD] hardcoded samplerate in audio example
>
can you give details on what version of pd you have, and like a screenshot
or something with the parameters?
the code from that file does get the sample rate from the soundfile into an
"insample" variable, so it looks like it should work, but I haven't
thoroughly tested it yet.
you can also open
In fact we have encountered problems specifically with my favorite PureData
patch, the phase-vocoder, used for many different purposes, particulary with
location scrolling, usefull for network time-stretch sample reading, speed is
not as same as original soundfile when samplerate is 48000hz.
Yep... these patches date back to before that outlet :)
For now it migth suffice to mention that the patches only work on 44k1
soundfiles... and incidentally, thee best one (teh phase vocoder) works
fine on 48K files, you just have to adjust the transposition by 147 cents.
cheers
Miller
On
Hello,
I've found something awkward in all fft patches from 03.audio-examples that
leads to mistakes.
Samplerate is hardcoded to 44100, so this wouldn't work correctly when opening
soundfiles having another samplerate.
This should be corrected by using [soundfiler] second outlet instead of
