So, 92% (or whatever) finders are convenient for the automatic people.
Pentax market their flagship stuff as being aimed at the conscious
photographers - being able to determine the image content of the negative in
the finder should be an obvious feature.
-Original Message-
From: lbparis
I downloaded Vuescan thinking that I would purchase it after a short trial.
However, it would not recognize my scanner, a HP Scanjet 5470c on a USB. I
have just upgraded my system to Windows XP and tried to follow the
instructions on the Vuescan site, but nothing worked. I could not figure
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_162/1620067.stm
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
In a message dated 10/29/2001 3:04:48 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Speaking of things Mamiya, I bought a Mamiya U at a garage sale on the
weekend.
It's a small compact rangefinder with fixed 35/2.8 Sekor lens. Focus is
via
4
settings which progressively move
Well... I finally lost my *^#@ eyecup from my ZX-5n, at a camera store
(a lousy one at that... I'll go there later.) Can someone point me to a
source of replacements that don't cost a kings ransom? I'll probably
wind up getting 2 or 3, just in case. Thanks.
soap box Now my camera store rant.
I find if i try to get close to the horses i
photograph,they want to come over for a visit.Then
i talk to them a bit ,move into position and as Emeril
says...Bamm
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Richard Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 12:27:14 -0600
To: [EMAIL
Hiya there,
let me expose it the following way. I am complete unexperienced regarding
Pentax but I am willing to learn as much a possible.
For a certain time someone has lent me the K 2. Wonderful camera.
I have got a relationship with it already and the first pictures came out
great, too.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_162/1620067.stm
Norm
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
darryn wrote:
Speaking of things Mamiya, I got a Mamiya U at a garage sale on the weekend.
It's a small compact rangefinder with fixed 35/2.8 Sekor lens. Focus is via 4
settings which progressively move the lens assembly away from the body, with
steps at 1 metre, 1.5 metres, 3 metres and
On Sunday, October 28, 2001, at 02:22 PM, Bob Walkden wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if this is the sort of thing you're able to dial in, but
at the pro lab I generally use they offer, on their c-41 machine
printing service, a set of choices which includes full frame with a
bit of the black
On Sunday, October 28, 2001, at 03:56 PM, Cameron R. Hood wrote:
Get a second job to support your ink habit.
Last time I checked, we were consuming around $400 a month in ink at the
store.
OW!
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Hi Silke, and welcome to the list! The FA 28-70/4 is a very good allround
zoom lens, although the manual focussing feel is pretty bad. If you plan to
get a AF body eventually (and the MZ-5N is a great one) that lens is a very
good alternative.
For other lenses, most K-mount SMC Pentax lenses are
OK, maybe 3 weeks is necessary, then maybe a Hi Bill with the
window rolled down as we go by ;) My dad took
the family on a trip like that (minus Mt. Rushmore) in 2 weeks, I
was only 10 years old, but it is a great memory. It was in 1967
which was Canada`s centennial, that`s how I always
I was just taking some shots of my daughter with my A3000. I hadn't used it
much since I got my MZ-5N and I was struck by how much cooler it sounds than
the newer camera. There's a definite KA-chunk with the A3000 followed by
the winder. The winder sounds like it's working a bit to advance the
Hi Jaun, glad you had a great time, I have to agree with you about Shel
and his abilities WRT people photography, he is the best I`ve seen.
Looking forward to seeing the pics.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Juan J. Buhler wrote:
Just came back from San Francisco, where I met and
Hi Erik,
As you see, I am not hesitating. 15 years of photo experiences should give
you a competitive edge! *smile*
Thank you very much for your prompt reply. It feels good to be welcome, also
as a beginner.
The camera has got a 55 mm, a basic lens. At least one of the people at
the market
Hi,
the voltage of the flash capacitor in the old Metz 45CT1 is maximum 350-360
Volts. The sync. voltage can't be higher than that as it is derived from the
capacitors voltage. This is true for most of the older flashes.
The newer version 45CL1 ( L like Low sync voltage; there's an additional
Hi Cory,
Just tell her that you're seeking to become a better
listener If that doesn't workwellat
least I'm not spending time with another woman..
Good luck! Regards, Mike Steele
--- Cory or Brenda Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I was just taking some shots of my daughter with my
Richard Seaman wrote:
Christian, Patrick,
OK, guys, if I show you mine will you show me yours?
http://www.richard-seaman.com/Wallpaper/Nature/index.html#insects
I'd love to see macro photos from you guys and any other PDMLers! How about
returning a URL and letting us all have a
Jim Moniz wrote:
Several months ago, I announced that I was going to be doing my very first
paid shoot (head shots of a ballet class), and told you all about what I would
be using. The feedback I got from you was invaluable. I took the advice of
several of you (use something other than
some used sawdust, but you could also get flock, way back when...
Regards,
/\/\ick...
++
||
__/) Mick Maguire |
| Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
(_/) ICQ: 48609010 |
\/
Thanks Richard. I did notice a lot of caterpillar photos on your site!
The Io caterpillars were everywhere in that tree and it was impossible to
get a good head shot of one of them while they were feeding. In the end, I
filled the frame with color and spines and feet! I think the Velveta(sic)
If editor's still demand lots of shots to chose from, as most do, the whole
argument is moot. Besides those slide photographers throw out more slides
than they keep. Then there is the question of accessablity, do photos stored
in a box in my attic add anything to the record of history?
The whole
John,
Don't know what you consider a kings ransom but BH carries the eyecups for
$22.50 each (prince's ransom, maybe?).
As to your customer service issues - Hear, Hear!! I agree totally! On
occasion it seems as though some camera stores put in their job
requirements, Must be capable of
Actually I've heard this complaint even to day. I know at least one Maxxum 9
shooter who was a little shocked to find that when he printed some film the
feet on a subject he was shooting wasn't in the print. Of course he normally
left it off the edge in his old camera knowing it would be on the
From
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/26/national/26MAIL.html?searchpv=past7days
Experts generally agreed that foods sent through the mail would not be
affected. No radiation or significant heat is generated in the process,
which is already widely used to sterilize bandages, food containers,
The strange thing about selecting lenses is that it tends to sort itself out
with experience. After awhile you find that for many of your shots you can't
seem to get close enought so you get a longer lens. Or you don't have room
to back up far enough so you get a wide angle. Or you find yourself
Does anybody know what the viewfinder coverage of the Spotmatic SP is? I
know it's different than the SP II, but I can't find the info either on
Jonkman's site, Gerjan's book, or in Comon.
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
Hi,
I don't know about the A3000, but I picked up a MEII
winder over the weekend (birthday present for
myself:)) for my Super Programs and ME and compared to
my ZX-5n it really sounds like it means business.
Kinda like the difference between and electric scooter
and a Harley.
William in Utah.
Last week I ranted about the flimsy feel of the MX and indicated that I
especially didn't like the feel of the film advance lever. This was, of
course, based on my MX, which I purchased just after it had been
overhauled by Pentax.
When I received the camera I asked the list about the non-linear
Yeah this was all due to those 2 big solar flares back on around the 18th, I
think. one was an X1 level and the other an X1.6 level. The brighter one was
followed by a full halo mass ejection of about 2 billion tons of solar
material. They figured it would strike the Earth sometime on the 21st,
Tom;
That photo is awesome! The eyes and fangs are tack sharp and the legs add
good depth and 3-dimensionality (is that even a word?). The only niggling
issue I would have is the fore-leg that is completely out of focus on the
right.
Christian Skofteland
-Original Message-
From:
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
If editor's still demand lots of shots to chose from, as most do, the whole
argument is moot. Besides those slide photographers throw out more slides
than they keep. Then there is the question of accessablity, do photos stored
in a box in my attic add anything to the
I have 4 also.
Meade 152ED/APO 6 F9 refractor
Meade (Kowa) 80mm F15 refractor from the late 60's.
LOMO 133.5mm F10.2 Maksutov-Cassegrain
Celestron 127mm F6 Schmidt-Cassegrain
All can be mounted at the same time on my Celestron CI-700 equatorial mount.
It's a close battle whether I've spent more
Aaron,
Is this an attempt at 'speculation enabling'?
Rob
C'mon, guys, I'm trying to stir up endless speculation about the features,
specs and price of this camera from only its name and dimensions. You're
really disappointing me!
-Aaron
Minolta did that on the RD-175. Unfortunately the process causes the all
lenses to have to be rated at F6.7 aperture or slower regardless of how fast
they are. This is because not only does the lens have to change the light
going to the chip but also to the viewfinder since it has to be done
On 29 Oct 2001, at 9:38, Cory or Brenda Waters wrote:
There's a definite KA-chunk with the A3000 ..
Start with the 67 - that's one earth-shattering KA-CHUNK!!
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
I read that already. And I agree with you. But to start I need at least a
certain
amount of lenses, don't I? At least 2? One for the close and one for the
distance.
And exactly that is what I am trying to find out. But I certainly don't want
to spend
money just to get an equipment I am not able
Maybe ugly but you notice Nikon made the shutter angle and location exactly
the same as the F100/F5. Smart move I'd say. This is the kind of things a
good design team should pay attention to. But it's looks might take some
getting used to. And the limited lens range.
Kent Gittings
-Original
Skofteland, Christian wrote:
Tom;
That photo is awesome! The eyes and fangs are tack sharp and the legs add
good depth and 3-dimensionality (is that even a word?).
Thanks.
The only niggling
issue I would have is the fore-leg that is completely out of focus on the
right.
Yeah,
Shel;
I got my MX last Monday and was surprised at how solid it felt after reading
the rants from the list members. I was really expecting a flimsy camera
without the positive feel and solidity of the LX. I am already in love with
the mechanical shutter!
Christian Skofteland
-Original
And don't forget to get a $1.00 pack of those little
black elastic bands to help keep the new one on.
--- David Hatfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John,
Don't know what you consider a kings ransom but BH
carries the eyecups for
$22.50 each (prince's ransom, maybe?).
As to your customer
I've been pretty happy with mine but after 3 months something burned up
inside. They tried to claim I used the wrong power supply and didn't want
to honor it, after much bitching they finally waranteed it. In other words,
keep every shred of packing material, the receipt, and send in the
Now for the gravity-defying question: Was it climbing up the wall or going
down? ;^)
Christian Skofteland
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
BTW, he's clinging to a vertical wall.
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go
On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Bruce Dayton wrote:
My homepage is Google.com I don't want to see all that junk. If I do, I go
to yahoo, who can supply as much junk as I can possibly want.
My homepage used to be an eBay search for Pentax, sorted by most recent
items first. :)
chris
-
This message is
Not just that. The common type of CCD/CMOS array currently being used is
front illuminated. That means the part that illuminates the pixel is in
front. This means the light getting to it must pass through and around this
part of the array. As a result I'm pretty sure in the case of front
Shel wrote:
Anyone know where I can get some flocking to line a few lens hoods?
--
Shel Belinkoff
Hi Shel,
You might try looking here: http://people.smu.edu/rmonagha/mf/black.html .
Discusses various approaches other have taken.
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the
There's an EI-100 @ a reasonable price on Yahoo! Classifieds. $135.
Collin
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I saw this one on Costco's website for $149. Does it really scan at 1800
dpi (optical)? I've had a Umax scanner for a while but it is SCSI and
it's
been a pain to connect ever since we moved into our new home. I've been
eyeing USB scanners (Epson 1250 photo, Umax 6450) and they have a
I check the news and have some links set up to weather and spaceweather
sites which I use frequently which made it convenient. Google is the search
engine I use exclusively.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October
One last question.
Does it support Twain acquire? I'd love to just import directly through
Photoshop.
I'm really tempted at that price. I've been just using the scanners we have
here in our lab at Apple and while they are nice they are not at home :-)
On top of that, my wife is wanting to
Bill P. wrote:
Now ~here's~ a hell of a thing A trick I read of to limit scattering
inside telescope tubes is to glue a layer of oatmeal (!!) inside the tube,
then paint flat black. Allegedly works like a charm. Uggh!
Bill,
Yeah, I'd probably rather live with a little flare s.
--Mike
Actually Brendan I have an old Umax SCSI scanner I'm not using now either. I
think it is a 600S model. I replaced it with a USB Epson with an add on film
scanner module. I was using the Vuescan software with it in fact. Let me
know if you have an interest.
Kent Gittings
-Original
Hi,
I was going to post that link under the subject 'Something to argue
about'. Anyway, here's another link that's relevant:
http://digitaljournalist.org/issue9807/editorial.htm
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, October 29, 2001, 12:40:32 PM, you wrote:
Replaces, but you can still use the original drivers/interface at any time
in the normal way.
You open Vuescan on the desktop and do your scanning. The software will
open your image-editing program, importing the scanned image.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: David Brooks [EMAIL
Hi everyone,
I hope you don't mind a dumb questionbut I have
been thinking about getting a new scanner, and
actually this film scanner sounds great...especially
the price...but it does both B W and color? I
actually want it for BW, to do proofs, before I
decide which negatives are worth
Known variously as irregular surface baffling or random surface baffling. Or
Quaker Oats baffling if your brand conscience.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Johnston
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:18 PM
To: [EMAIL
One last question.
Does it support Twain acquire? I'd love to just import directly through
Photoshop.
Yep, it does - if you don't mind a bigish file I can email you a sample or
two
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow
Hi everyone,
I hope you don't mind a dumb questionbut I have
been thinking about getting a new scanner, and
actually this film scanner sounds great...especially
the price...but it does both B W and color? I
actually want it for BW, to do proofs, before I
decide which negatives are
Tim,
I'd love to have a sample. could you email it to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks!
Delano
From: Tim S Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 19:42:26 -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Got a cheap film scanner...
One last question.
Does it
Unless I'm totally wrong any scanner will do BW, it just subtracts the
color information from the scanned image. If it doesn't you can convert it
to grayscale with the image-editing software.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: Tim S Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Sicko!
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: Stinking MSN
On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Bruce Dayton wrote:
My homepage is Google.com I don't want to see all that junk. If I do,
I go
I was in there once and bought a bag from them. They were rude to me
and everyone else in the store too. I have not been back.
Thanks,
Ed
http://lightandsilver.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John A. Hufnagel
Sent: Monday,
It does scan at 1800. I've got some different scans at
http://home.earthlink.net/~myehle/photos Most of what I've done is scanning
velvia for the web, I haven't tried printing yet.
How do you like the Umax? what are the specs on it? The reason I'm asking
is if I can find a reasonably
yes, I've used it directly under photoshop.
Get ahold of me off-list maybe we can figure something out since I'm
looking for a SCSI scanner...
From: Delano Mireles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Got a cheap film scanner...
Date: Mon, 29
I finally got it to scan a BW image, but, I've only tried scanning a couple
and they were from my 1st attempt at bw so they were pretty rough.
Mike Y.
From: Mike Steele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Got a cheap film scanner...
Date: Mon, 29
Kent I'm almost afraid what you'll have to sell next
**cough maxxum**
--- Kent Gittings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually Brendan I have an old Umax SCSI scanner I'm
not using now either. I
think it is a 600S model. I replaced it with a USB
Epson with an add on film
scanner module. I was
Ed:
Sounds like you're in my area. From one Pentax lover to another, any
other shops in the area you know of? NYC isn't too far away, but I'd
like to find a good shop within like 30 miles or so.
Thanks!
-- John
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 15:16:48 -0500
From: Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ZX
Kent Gittings wrote:
[Lots of stuff on CCD imaging Quotes and comments interspersed below]
Hi Kent,
Just a few notes, interspersed with quotes from your earlier message
The common type of CCD/CMOS array currently being used is
front illuminated. That means the part that illuminates
Thanks Tom C
Begin Original Message
From: aimcompute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 12:36:34 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: viewscan is...
Replaces, but you can still use the original drivers/interface at any
time
in the normal way.
You open Vuescan on the
Kent Gittings wrote:
Known variously as irregular surface baffling or random surface
baffling. Or Quaker Oats baffling if your brand conscience.
Well, my wife remarked that the tube on my 8 Dobsonian scope looks a lot
like a giant oatmeal box. Maybe the oatmeal baffling would be quite
You would certainly have a conversation piece at star parties... go ahead
Bill... do it!
Tom C.
Well, my wife remarked that the tube on my 8 Dobsonian scope looks a lot
like a giant oatmeal box. Maybe the oatmeal baffling would be quite
apropos. Would probably look cool if the white
93%
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Johnston
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Spotmatic viewfinder coverage?
Does anybody know what the viewfinder coverage of the Spotmatic SP is? I
Hi,
In addition to what Kent says, there is alsothe issue with leaving
enough space for the mirror to be able to swing up and down...
Cheers,
Boz
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
Bad Aaron Bad
--- Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, October 29, 2001, at 10:54 AM, Robert
Soames Wetmore wrote:
Is this an attempt at 'speculation enabling'?
S, no one else appears to have caught on!
-Aaron
-
Get your free @yahoo.ca address at
I'm not really in your area, I'm a little north of Baltimore. I do
business occasionally in Bridgewater.
Thanks,
Ed
http://lightandsilver.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John A. Hufnagel
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 3:46 PM
Can anyone give me an opinion on the Takumar 200 f3.5 pre-set? How good is
it wide open? How does it compare with the SMC M 200 f4? What would be a
fair price for the Tak 200 f3.5 and the SMC M200 4? The Takumar is quite a
big lens, and has a tripod mount attached. The extra half stop
On 29 Oct 2001, at 13:17, Mike Johnston wrote:
Yeah, I'd probably rather live with a little flare s.
Hi Mike,
Your email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] looks like a trampoline
to my ISP :-) Have you an alternate address?
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)
The M200/4 is an excellent lens. I use mine frequently, with very nice
results. My current PUG submission was shot with that lens, as was my
entry of two months ago. The latter photo was shot directly into the
headlights of a truck with no noticeable flare. I would guess that the
Takumar pre-set
In my humble opinion, you don't need any particular amount of lenses. You've
got a good one on your camera to begin with. The type of photography you want
to do will dictate how many and what focal length lenses you need. Henri
Cartier-Bresson managed pretty well, and he used only three
Hi, Dave,
I have no idea how much it would be, but once you find out from other
list-members what to expect, you can contact Kominek's here in Toronto -
their e-mail address in at the site:
http://www.kominek.com/
They answer their e-mails quickly, and they seem to be pretty friendly
and
Other than that, Ilford 400 Delta BW is quite nice but doesn't
push too well (if that worries you).
I have never really shot much Ilford film, but i might give this a go. I'm
also considering Neopan 400.
For color, use print film. Slap on that filter, push it a stop if you
have to, and go.
Why do you need a couple of lenses? What have you tried to photograph that
the lens you have didn't work for? How often have you run into that problem?
Go out and shoot pictures. Read a couple of books. We on this list can help
you decide which lens is best for your purpose, but we can not
Christian,
I do my macro photos using an MZ-5, SMC Pentax FA 100mm f2.8 macro lens,
AF500FTZ flash and ASA400 film, either Kodak Supra, Fuji Superia or anything
else that looks good and cheap at BH! The lens goes up to 1:1
magnification.
I always use this lens in manual focus mode.
The problem is probably more the lab than the Bernese grin. Seriously, the
lab probably made prints based on the overall exposure, when they needed to
be weighed toward the shadow detail in the dogs. Try having them reprinted
by someone who knows what they are doing.
You can improve the exposure
Funny enough, I've grown quite attached to the sound of my pz1p. My first
reaction to the MZ-S was oh my g** what is that noise!?!? :) My pz1p was
quite loud at first... but I guess my shutter has broken in over the last
two years and it is now a quiet, almost musical, snicker.
Nick
--
Ilford's HP5+ is an awesome film. It is 400 ISO but has extremely fine
grain. I use it for everything from feature stories to sports action, pushes
very nicely too. I develop it in Kodak T-Max Pro.
Nick
--
From: Paul Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fine Grained
At 10:24 PM -0600 10/27/01, aimcompute wrote:
That sounds pretty neat Steve. I was to Maine when I was a kid. I still
think it would be a neat place to live because of the isolation.
If you do any astrophotography, I'd like to see it.
I've just started dabbling in it again for the first time
- Original Message -
From: Paul Jones
Subject: Re: Fine Grained 400 b/w
Hi Bill,
T400CN seems to have discontinued and has disapeared from most
of the shops
near me. Its been replaced with Portra 400, which is supposed
to be really
hard to print with in a convential dark room.
I
- Original Message -
From: Wendy Beard
Subject: Re: My weekend with Leica and Rollei and Pentax and a
bunch of dawgs
Last weekend I went to a Carting workshop.
Not go-karting for dogs, something a little more sedate. It
covered things
like choosing and fitting harnesses, drafting
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: POW Page
OK, but what did I do that's a header tag? Can you point to
the line
of code?
Since you asked.
I applied a basic declaration ( !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//ENHTML ) to your page
and then
According to Boz's site, at least a couple of the older 50mm K-mounts are
compatible with the same lens hoods. Specifically, the SMC-M f/1.4 and the
SMC-M f/2 can use the PH-R49, PH-S49, and the RH-R49 lens hoods.
Are any of the newer hoods available at say BH compatible with these
particular
Hey guys,
I just checked out the Kodak website to try to confirm
the rumors that T400cn is discontinued, but nothing's
there...
Where did you get this info? Sure the Portra 400 film
is listed as well, but this is listed as for printing on
professional color negative papers while T400CN is
Hi Brian,
The shop where i buy film had a letter from Kodak saying they had ceased
production and when there stock runs out, its gone for good.
I'm sure they probaly have a bucket load of it still storage.
Cya
- Original Message -
From: Brian Campbell (PM) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Hi
I am considering buying a film scanner with around 2700dpi. Please tell me your
recommendation. I would be grateful if you could show me some scanned examples. Thanks!
Frankie
--
Åwªï¨Ï¥ÎHongKong.com¶l¥ó¨t²Î
Thank you for using hongkong.com
Hi everyone,
I've been busy getting ready for my wedding so I've been away from the
list for a while. Less that 2 weeks until the day!
As part of my international union of holy matrimony involving Seoul,
Paris Sydney, I'm rounding out the festivities with a wedding
reception in Columbus,
96 matches
Mail list logo
