Brendan a écrit:
The *ist will work with screw mount lenses in aperture
priority, you set the aperture, the camera sets the
rest. As for E-TTL, it's P-TTL here and it can be
turned off ( unlike the canon ).
P-TTL works only with lenses type A (and F, FA).
And too with K and M lenses modified for
I know it's easy to jump the panic button, but truly with international
mail, customs, terrorists etc assuming he got it is a bit much to assume.
Furthermore he might be on a couple of days holiday. I had that recently
happen with an Ebay purchase myself and I couldn't ask for a better person
to
i have discovered that there is no accounting for taste. if the technically bad shots
are removed, then what is left is what should be presented. so, bad exposure, bad
focus, closed eyes, many blurs, etc, should be removed, but all else should stay.
that's for portrait stuff only. for editorial
Who is this person sending these messages? Steve WHAT? WHO Cottrell?
It cannot be, we all know your name is _really_ Cottington! Perhaps
Cottington Cottrell, or Cottington Steve Cotrell... hmmm..
LOL. Yeah, right. Trying to configure the Mail.app in OS X
Actually it is Cottrell, but you can
High Doug,
NIVA is a russian car produced by LADA
and also sold in Germany (Bundesrepublik Deutschland),
technical a very simple car,
fit for deserts in Uzbekistan and mountains in Germany.
Price here from 14 000 to ...(I dont know) ? 16 000 US-$
= 16 000 EURO. Lowest
How do YOU handle your proofs when handing them back to clients? Do you
sort and only hand the good ones back or do you give them the whole 9 yards
so they know you're not holding anything back?
Never, ever, ever let the client see the duds. If necessary, I would
destroy the negatives.
.02,
To where in the U.S. did you ship it? There are a lot of us over here
and it would help to know where to put our special attention.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: K50/1.2
Perhaps I should have elaborated. I go through the prints at least two
times. First to go are the out of focus, camera shake examples, and
flash miss-fires. Next pass looks carefully for inappropriate gestures,
items in the field of view, eye blinks of the bride and/or groom, etc.
Those make up
check back there will be alot of gear over the next month
http://cgi6.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItemsuserid=waynes
_photo_worldinclude=0since=-1sort=3rows=25
comming soon
pz-1p, tokina 28-70mm 2.6-2.8 atx pro, 20-35mm 3.5-4.5 tokina and maybe
another 90mm VS1 2.5 macro with
Levente -Levi- Littvay wrote:
So the MZ-S and the Z/SF series are my options. (and the *ist which has
not been tested by any of us... so I'll wait... :))
In my experience, manual focusing in the MZ-S would be the best of the
lot, in spite of the relative low magnification finder, the
Although I have no immediate plans for going into digital photography, I
have read with interest the strings here on the *ist. The C D60 seemed
an outstanding camera to judge any competitor by, until reading the head to
head specifications of its replacement, the 10D, in Amateur Photographer,
Hi, Gary,
Vaughn is just north of me here in Toronto. I think GO Trains or buses go
up there, but before I head up there with my old big huge Soligor 70-230
zoom hanging off my Spotmatic (I never use the lens anyway, and it must be
good for ~something~), do you have his phone number?
I'm going
Hi,
Yeah, sure, at $3 a roll, I'll try it. I was just confused at what seemed
the discrepancy between the Agfa Canada site, and what the salesman at
Downtown told me. As long as I know what it is, I'll try it out, and shoot
accordingly.
Thanks a lot,
frank
Caveman wrote:
It's quite
My understanding is that the *ist may be, as you say, a crippled mount.
However the *istD is as fully compatible as a PZ-1p. IMO, although the *ist
and *ist D share the same chassis, they are as different as a ZX-60 and an
ZX-5n. I'm intrigued by the small size and the ability to use readily
The most significant thing that current D60 users are wondering about is
if the AF of the 10D is improved.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two key things from this to me, firstly, the latest model is two-thirds of
the price of the D60 and the new model comes in an magnesium alloy body,
instead of
The most significant thing that current D60 users are wondering about is
if the AF of the 10D is improved.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two key things from this to me, firstly, the latest model is two-thirds of
the price of the D60 and the new model comes in an magnesium alloy body,
instead of
From: Collin Brendemuehl
What was your first published photograph?
(Yeah, I know I'm late on this topic, but I started and didn't have
time to finish it earlier and just want to be part of the gang...
:-) )
At the (university) School of Journalism around 1988 I published a few
photos of myself
--- Gary L. Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there someone on the list that lives in or near,
Vaughan, Ontario?
I used BIN on an eBay auction for a AF-500FTZ flash
and sent him a
$240.00 USPS International Money Order. I mailed it
last Saturday but
what is bothering me is the guy has
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 15:20:15 +0100, you wrote:
A comment and a question:
- I think John baby photo is a great one. (My guess is that mother
is standing right beside the photographer making funny faces or waving
a favourite pet doll in order to evoke a smile from you.)
My wife runs across that
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
The most significant thing that current D60 users are wondering about is
if the AF of the 10D is improved.
No doubt.
As someone who would be a new entrant to the DSLR market, I would be looking
at the whole package. If I had a D60 and was happy how it performed, this
--- Stephen Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If a particular brand model sells well, why spend the
money to advertise it?
Only camera brands that don't sell too well get
advertised like you wouldn't believe..
It's has always been the case that Pentax cameras sell
as new models come out. The
Hi,
the 28-70 and 80-200/2.8 FA*´s are getting older and don´t match the
modern Pentax AF line very well in terms of apperance and features. If
Pentax intends to make replacements for them why not introduce a totally
new line of high grade f:3.5 zooms? Just think about it: smaller, lighter
and
Jeff wrote:
Hi Gary,
I live in North York, which is minutes away from Vaughan.
If you give me his address, I can at least verify if it's Kosher.
Jeff and all that replied...
First, thanks a TON for the offers.
I finally heard from the guy this morning. He said the only email he
received was
Nick Zentena wrote:
OTOH APX 400 should never be pushed. You can pull
it to 200.
The film box, european version, is printed inside with the development
times for EI 400 and 1600.
cheers,
caveman
--- Pål_Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen wrote:
Sheesh! I thought the *ist D was pretty big news.
But what the hell do I know?
I hate to repeate this again, but *ist D isn't great
news outside the Pentax pond. Unfortunately, Pentax
didn't use this oportunity to release a DSLR
The second one is a really good image, imo. What I like in both
images are the highlights around the rim of the petals, and the
composition with the unsharp buds below.
Found the highlight in the left part of #1 quite distracting,
though.
Agreed (both statements). It looks like #2 is
On 03.3.8 9:51 AM, Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The most significant thing that current D60 users are wondering about is
if the AF of the 10D is improved.
Hi Bruce,
Most of the digicams including DSLRs rather have various constraints in AF
particularly in locking on fast moving
Hi!
My freshly acquired ME Super has a strange problem. It goes like this.
1. I've run 4 films through it. Two films were 24 exp and two were 36
exp.
2. Both 24 exp films came out just right.
3. For both 36 exp films roughly around 30th frame camera looses touch
with the film. That is
AMEN
Yet the ads on new cameras seem to tout that with
this camera, we can improve your shots with our better
features.. Many users fell for these gimmicks only to
be dissappointed that technology alone doesn't take
good photographs. This is supposed to be your job.
Rick...
On 03.3.8 10:51 AM, KT Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a lot of real world examples coming out and one of the things
people are raving about 10D is its high ISO performance (far less noise).
Re ISO performance of 10D, testing by pro photographers admires that you
can't see much
From: John Mustarde
A comment and a question:
- I think John baby photo is a great one. (My guess is that
mother
is standing right beside the photographer making funny faces or
waving
a favourite pet doll in order to evoke a smile from you.)
My wife runs across that one every year or so.
I follow the digital area of a forum for professional photographers. I
am interested in comments and experiences of people who know what they
are doing and use these things all the time. I am not very interest in
opinions of gadget freak spectators.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not read
I follow the digital area of a forum for professional photographers. I
am interested in comments and experiences of people who know what they
are doing and use these things all the time. I am not very interest in
opinions of gadget freak spectators.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not read
That does sound like a long time in transit but I've seen things that
were shipped by air actually arrive by surface mail before. It may
happen again. Of course that won't help if the person receiving it
doesn't send it back or doesn't send you the payment again. I hope all
ends well.
Len
---
Once, I had to wait two months for a package from the US (air mail!). When I
finally received it, it occured that it spend a month on a Post Office in
Warsaw. So I'm a little more relaxed when it comes to post now.
Hope everything works out well with the lens.
Regards,
Lukasz
The 2 times that I bought things out of Australia over the last few
years both took an extraordinary amount of time to arrive in the US.
One of the items suffered from an assumption of meaning by the seller
that I'll get it out right away that really meant about a week later,
but it still was
On 03.3.8 11:16 AM, Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I follow the digital area of a forum for professional photographers. I
am interested in comments and experiences of people who know what they
are doing and use these things all the time. I am not very interest in
opinions of gadget
On 7 Mar 2003, Levente -Levi- Littvay wrote:
The *ist has the best (most sophisticated) autofocus and the prism is
some new bright one which sould be very cool. Also it can shoot more
pics per sec. (2.7)
I thought the *ist used a pentamirror system, and had a really atrotcious
viewfinder, at
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Tonghang Zhou wrote:
I've never done any printing myself, but I was reading
about making contact prints from negatives, and it would
seem unnecessary to use an enlarger for this purpose.
This is true..however, the negative has to be big enogh to see something
in if you'll
Hi!
Mtc 1) Will the *ist indeed work with all K-variants (ie Bojidar
Mtc Dimitrov's Pentax K-Mount list) back to original K?
I think that I've read someplace among myriad of *ist* posts that both
film and digi *ists are going to be fully compatible with all K mount
lenses.
Mtc 2) Using an M42
Hi!
I have only one thing to say, when I looked at the picture and noticed
new Kodak camera (the 14 MP one), it made me feel immediately as if I
was looking at some Borg technology. Man, it looks ugly...
---
Boris Liberman
www.geocities.com/dunno57
www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=38625
Ken,
There are a lot of gadget freaks. Most are not Japanese. Most are in
fields other than cameras. Try computers, high fidelity audio or video
equipment, toy trains, vintage autos, cell phones, or motorcycles just to
name a few that I could be drawn into.
Here in the USA, we
- Original Message -
From: Bob S
Subject: Re: *ist v D60 and now the EOS 10D.
Ken,
There are a lot of gadget freaks.
Gotta toss my two cents worth in. I am very much a gadget freak, and could
never be confused for a Japanese person, though I am quite easily confused.
I had
On March 8, 2003 12:46 pm, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Bob S
Subject: Re: *ist v D60 and now the EOS 10D.
Ken,
There are a lot of gadget freaks.
Gotta toss my two cents worth in. I am very much a gadget freak, and could
never be confused for a Japanese
On March 8, 2003 10:32 am, Caveman wrote:
Nick Zentena wrote:
OTOH APX 400 should never be pushed. You can pull
it to 200.
The film box, european version, is printed inside with the development
times for EI 400 and 1600.
Doesn't mean you have to-)) I guess I should have said IMHO
I'd be pretty pissed if the 28-70/2.8 was replaced with a 3.5.
A 24-70/2.8 would make me very happy.
tv
-Original Message-
From: Matti Etelapera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
the 28-70 and 80-200/2.8 FA*´s are getting older and don´t match the
modern Pentax AF line very well in
On Saturday, Mar 8, 2003, at 16:19 Europe/Warsaw, Matti Etelapera wrote:
Hi,
the 28-70 and 80-200/2.8 FA*s are getting older and dont match the
modern Pentax AF line very well in terms of apperance and features. If
Pentax intends to make replacements for them why not introduce a
totally
new
On 03.3.8 0:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I enjoy using them, but I can enjoy collecting them too.
So don't take the gadget freak comment as an ethnic slur. Most of us here
are a bit of gadget freaks.
Hi Bob and all,
Oh, no I never took it as an ethnic slur. I did not
http://www.photoblink.com/imageView.asp?ImageID=59147
William Robb
On 03.3.8 0:46 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had never thought that the term was a slur of any particular ethnic group,
Japanese or otherwise.
Hi William,
No, no, the term gadget freak is NOT the exclusive honourably mention of
Japanese alone :-). Certainly not an ethnic slur
That is a great shot. Aside from all the other things needed for a great
shot like that, it demonstrated that equipment counts. With a 600mm lens
with 1.4x converter, you need really good glass, and the shallow DOF of
an effective 840mm lens with a moving subject demands great AF.
BR
[EMAIL
Only if it has reeded edges. I've had any number of smooth edged toits
and they always slip away and roll under the bed or dresser or
workbench.
Thanks for the offer, tho'. What a guy! g
keith
Bill Owens wrote:
Keith,
I have a round toit somewhere around the house, want me to send it to
I think I figured out why my Kalimar 500mm reflex seems to give washed-out
pictures.
Because it's crap.
I took pictures of the same scene, one with an old Sears 80-200mm with
cheap 2x TC, and one with the Kalimar. The zoom plus TC combination had
better contrast and colors.
So now I'm starting
Lasse wrote:
So, you - do - use the word corral for it. I knew it only for horses
from cowboy stories.
Do the/you British call it the same?
Hi Lasse,
In Australia we still call them a Playpen.
Both our parents and grandparents have said that parents love them, and kids
hate them.
We borrowed one
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Gregory L. Hansen wrote:
At that price point, the Sigma 170-500mm f/5.6-6.3 looks like about
all there is. There's a Sigma reflex, but I don't think I want to go
with another manual focus reflex, I want AF and adjustable aperture.
And I'll probably use it with a TC, I do
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 20:37:47 -0500 (EST), Gregory L. Hansen wrote:
Are there any treasures that I've missed?
The Sigma APO Macro 400/5.6 should be well within your US$600 limit. I
got mine new on closeout for about US$525 or US$550. I've been very
happy with it, and the 2.9 or 3m close focus
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 17:19:36 +1100, Kevin Waterson wrote:
[...] The FS4000 however has not let me down when scanning 35mm
negs or color slide or color positives.
I've been quite pleased with mine. Just be aware that at 4000 dpi
you'll start pulling the grain out of some film types, resulting
Then there are those items that get set aside for
inspection.
I lost mail (letters) to and from 'Oz this past Christmas. First time
that has happened in many years.
Otis
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 8 Mar 2003 at 10:50, Craig Schroeder wrote:
The 2 times that I bought things
just out of curiosity i tried my tamron 17mm hood on my pentax fa 20mm and
it fits. i am assuming that the fa 24mm f2 is the same size so therefore it
would fit too. i now mount a b+w 82mm polariser in the hood permanetly well
it means one less polariser to carry.
also as the 20mm only comes with
On 03.3.8 10:51 AM, KT Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 03.3.8 9:51 AM, Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The most significant thing that current D60 users are wondering about is
if the AF of the 10D is improved.
I do not read much about N/C digital forums (in Japan) but I was
Anyone seen this auction? Seems he borrowed some HTML from Boz's web
site... :-(
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2914593525category=15240
--
Later,
Gary
I always weed out the pictures that are technically imperfect, or that make
the subject look bad. The only exception is when the model can learn from
poses that don't work. See, this is why I remind you to suck in your
stomach...
Pat White
On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 11:35 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
I have only one thing to say, when I looked at the picture and noticed
new Kodak camera (the 14 MP one), it made me feel immediately as if I
was looking at some Borg technology. Man, it looks ugly...
---
Boris Liberman
Indeed it
--- KT Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 03.3.8 0:46 PM, William Robb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, no, the term gadget freak is NOT the exclusive
honourably mention of
Japanese alone :-). Certainly not an ethnic slur
although I used it quite
often to laugh at ourselves.
Or a
On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 12:50 PM, William Robb wrote:
http://www.photoblink.com/imageView.asp?ImageID=59147
William Robb
Great shot.
And it's amazing the things can fly. There's a lot of people around
here who're built somewhat like that and I'm pretty sure most of them
can't fly
Actually, I laughed out loud when I read that. My husband is a police
detective, so I hang out with cops. When it comes to foul language, I've
heard it all. And then some. g
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003
Somehow, I don't think that you've ever been here:
http://www.photonews.net/cgi-bin/pagemage.pl?SHOWPAGE=index.html
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No doubt,
there are so-called working photographers lurking in
the forum somewhere trying to help and promote the
industry, but I would exercise my
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 10:47:47 +1030, you wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=4688item=2915302067rd=1
has any one used these lenses
put this lens on the 31mm and it becomes a 13mm or 19.5mm on the digital. it
wont matter if it is soft at the corners cos you wont see them
People making judgments on cameras, or any number of other things for
that matter, based on pictures and spec sheets is really funny. Neither
one of those things will give you any idea what it's like to use one. I
got to play with the Kodak 14n at Photo Expo. I was impress with how
solid it
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 20:37:47 -0500 (EST), you wrote:
I think I figured out why my Kalimar 500mm reflex seems to give washed-out
pictures.
Because it's crap.
I took pictures of the same scene, one with an old Sears 80-200mm with
cheap 2x TC, and one with the Kalimar. The zoom plus TC combination
Is anyone considering purchasing one of the new Canon i9100 photo printers?
I wonder how it will stack up against the Epson 2100/2200?
Cheers,
Rob Studdert (eBay ID: distudio)
PO Box 701
HURSTVILLE BC NSW 1481
AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please check
Doing remote fieldwork at the moment...back soon.
Cheers
Shaun Canning
Cultural Heritage Services
High Street,
good lens for 21mm on the new pentax dslr
in mint condition with box $970 Australian dollars
shipped anywhere in the world
i accept paypal
Hi all,
I might load up the ol' Spottie with some Scala and shoot some pics of my one year
old. Any suggestions for speed rating? Filters? I plan to shoot outdoors, sunny
conditions, using Super Tak 50 f1.4 and/or Super Tak 135 f3.5.
Thanks in advance,
Robert
Hi Guys,
I'm shooting some stuff for a magazine and i'm using printing film and
supplying the tiff files(edited down) and all the negs. I have been
considering just submitting the negs that i scan, but cant think of a decent
way to present them, if it were slides it would be easier, as i could
This one time, at band camp,
Robert Woerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I might load up the ol' Spottie with some Scala and shoot some pics of my one year
old. Any suggestions for speed rating? Filters? I plan to shoot outdoors, sunny
conditions, using Super Tak 50 f1.4 and/or Super
76 matches
Mail list logo
