Hi!
I am sorry if I jump in the middle of the train of somebody's thought
or something. Much traffic, little time. Anyway, I am quite amazed by
the difference between the two shots, Bruce. While the husband (he is
a husband already, is he not? g) virtually did not move, the wife
g did quite
Hi!
Hope it wasn't done on Saturday, Cotty. Normally, observing Jews,
which seems to be the case with this fellow, don't like to be
photographed on Saturdays...
I thereby confirm that you are clear of any vehicular and/or beerish
influence, Cotty g...
Boris
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:48:41
Hi,
I would suggest a West London venue, perhaps starting at the pubs by Hammersmith
Bridge and heading west along the river. Especially on a late spring
or early summer evening.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Monday, February 23, 2004, 10:12:14 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 23/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Hi,
A question for the well-informed: how comes that in Edinburgh
the price for a bottle of Lagavulin 16 years was roughly 6 times
the price here? Do they produce a different export version?
absurd tax rates.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Well, methinks you walked right back into a car thread
LOL That dude with a hat looks to be non other than LJK
Setright, the noted automotive journalist and writer. Dug
up a pic of him in an old Motorsport mag I had stashed away,
and damn, I bet that's him. He was younger then, as the pic
was
Thats okay, Chris. I've been told Dinsdale Piranha nailed your head
to the floor.
What? Old Dinsy? Naah - he wouldn't do a thing like that. Not Dinsy!
Well, maybe just a little bit.
There is a very slim chance that this is a bit premature, since I don't
have film back from it yet, but I got my 77mm LTD from Adorama this week
(BH lost a customer because of their restrictive shipping requirements,
but no hard feelings). Coincidently, the Aussie poked its head just
above
Hi,
Shel wrote:
Well, Larry, as long as there's a Pentax somewhere in your
life, the rules keeper must consider that, and that, had you
had the Pentax with you, you'd have used it instead of the
asterisk brand. That said, lemme look at the pic ...
Is it not bizzare that the only brand to
In a message dated 2/25/2004 12:51:32 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, Marnie,
Don't leave us. In fact, you're not allowed to leave. Not because I say
so, but because the PDML gods say so. You're spiritually a member,
regardless of whether you have any Px
Hi,
Abano wrote:
I din't knew him. Gorgeous work, I like the style. It
reminds me a bit to Doisneau.
He's not at all famous and probably never will be. But what he's done,
for me, eclipses the works of greater photographers. He lived in the
community, the community funded his photography by
- Original Message -
From: Derby Chang
Subject: I love my Heaven77
I think a black-ring UV filter looks terrible on it. Need to find a
slim-line silver filter. Then I'll be set for my sisters wedding
(just a
small matter of deciding what to wear).
Pentax makes a matching UV
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re: PAW
Bill,
Can you share a bit more info? The shot is intriguing to me.
One (hair) light, the 77mm at f/11 on the istD.
The model moved a bit just about the time I shot, hence the hot spot
on her nose. I missed that one.
I still
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Bruce Dayton wrote:
does alter things a bit. A constant aperture 2.8 24-90 would be nice.
I assume that this has to be longer and heavier (and more expensive)
than the 28-70/2.8. Are you sure it would be nice? :-)))
Kostas
Cord tells me that the reason they're not stocking the istD
(or any other Pentax SLR) is because Pentax is not able to
deliver the quantities they need for building volume sales
and the large customer base that a retailer needs to establish
a product line.
But they do sell a lot of Pentax ps,
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: RE: I love my Heaven77
Isn't flare an issue with this lens?
No.
Sorry, it was the 43 that my colleague has problems with.
Kostas
Peter
Thanks for your comments
I agree, note that I did trust the PZ-1P multi-zone metering and bracketed
0.7.
All my ~20 images in my opinion contain too much light in the sky, partly
because of the
muggy weather reflecting the city lights.
Still, I didn't want to miss the opportunity
A key
Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, William Robb wrote:
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Isn't flare an issue with this lens?
No.
Sorry, it was the 43 that my colleague has problems with.
Wow. I've never had any flare problems with my 43 Limited and I don't
use
At last I got developed my first pictures taken with my new camera,
the MZ-6. So here they are:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2161546
A balcony with a good view in Oradea, downtown. I think it is nicer in BW.
The following two picutres were taken from that balcony:
It's actually a Peugeot 504. And it looks remarkably like the one my
parents owned when we lived in Argentina! (it was stolen, but the thieves
left it two blocks away because they couldn't get it out of first gear; the
trick was to NOT use first gear).
Christian
- Original Message -
Hi Frank,
The car is, well was, a Peugeot 504. They are plenty
here, it's a good car, a workhorse loved by taxi
drivers.
Regards
Albano
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Albano,
Looks like a car I used to own. Really. A 1972
Toyota Corolla. With about
that much rust. But,
Of course you are welcome too, Cesar.
No more PDML Toronto, PDML Grandafather,
PDML BS AS!!!
Regards
Albano
--- Cesar Matamoros II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
tv,
Maybe we can make it part of our world tour!!!
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
P.S. The only time I have been in South
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the data. With style I referred to his way
to photograph people posing smiley and happy to do so,
looking friendly and proud of their existences. I like
this kind of portraits, no matter if they are more or
less documentary than no posed ones.
Regards
Albano
--- mike.wilson
Hi, Ken.
Thanks for your comment. We are a bit soft because the
exposure was a couple of seconds. Also, it's scanned
from a contact print and cropped, the neg looks very
sharp and printable (what I'll do).
Regards
Albano
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice capture, love the
-Original Message-
From: Cesar Matamoros II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tv,
Maybe we can make it part of our world tour!!!
Let's do a southern hemisphere tour next winter.
tv
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: I love my Heaven77
Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, William Robb wrote:
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Isn't flare an issue with this lens?
No.
Sorry, it was the 43 that my colleague
GRIN!
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
graywolf wrote:
Hum..? I think I have a CD of war pipes somewhere. No, too cruel. I have the
apartment on the other side of me to consider, they were out today thus my
opportunity. Besides the building structure may not handle it.
They use Schubert on the PA
There is not question that the traffic has increased, but I agree that
there are many who like the PAW stuff better then the technical stuff.
I think we just have to be more careful about labeling. I for one find
that I just delete entire threads because I have no time to look at
them. I try
Likewise ... my 43mm ltd never showed a hint of flare under
any circumstance. I will, however, admit to using a
slightly larger/deeper lens hood than the standard one, but
not specifically for flare protection ... it was just easier
to use for my style of carrying and shooting.
William Robb
The * (asterisk) on the ist and istD are similar to the star on the FA*
lenses, which are similar to the Zeiss T* symbol. But, you are right, it is
still weird.
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
-Original Message-
From: mike.wilson [mailto:[EMAIL
I'll second that. 43 is an excellent lens, it's just that the optimum
performance comes 'late' at f/8-f/11. The 77 is another story though,
extremely sharp from wide opened, and even at close focusing distance. I
wished Pentax makes something wider than 31mm and longer than 100mm
Limited lenses.
PAW good. Like pictures. Want to put pictures on
PAW. How?
Thanks,
Bob
=
What boots up must come down.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
http://www.electric-chicken.co.uk/
http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/rainview.html
Taken from my bedroom window this morning ...
Been thinking about getting a bulk film loader. Is anyone
still using these things. Which brands are considered
better? I'd want a very good quality loader and don't mind
paying a little extra for it.
I am using a Tamron 28-75/2.8 now. For DSLR 1.5 crop factor, the 24
would be nicer.
We were talking about a lens for wedding photography, not a consumer
zoom.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 2:33:23 AM, you wrote:
KK On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Bruce Dayton wrote:
does alter
Hi Bob,
You need a site to host your pictures. The simplest (and
free) way to go seems to be photo.net. I'm sure there are
instructions for uploading on the site. And since quite a
few folks here use the system, I'm sure they can jump in
with more details on how things work.
Many ISPs also
David Madsen schrieb:
The * (asterisk) on the ist and istD are similar to the star on the FA*
lenses, which are similar to the Zeiss T* symbol. But, you are right, it is
still weird.
There we have the solution:
The Pentax people do read this list of course,
and they've read all our whining
I bulk load. It's very easy. The most tedious part is trimming the leader after the
film is loaded. I tried using a
roll without trimming, and the camera I used (a Contax ST) did not want to accept it.
Trimming is no bid deal, though.
One potential hazard with bulk loading is failure to
I'll add my 2
I actually like the second picture better. When I first saw the first
picture there was something about the dynamic between the husband and wife
that just didn't feel right to me. I still can't put my finger on it but I
know it makes me uncomfortable.
Also, concerning soft focus. I
You got 120 mph in second gear out of a '57 Ford engine? And a '57 Ford tranny?!
I hope you didn't try that without an armor plate tranny cover!
Or, are you still on crutches?
keith whaley
Paul Sorenson wrote:
Back in the days of the Big Iron from Detroit a friend had a '57 Ford that
someone
frank theriault wrote:
Dave,
His real name is Jonathan, and if need be, I can let you know who he works
for - like if he owes you a door mirror or something vbg.
(Door mirrors are a favourite target for bike couriers - 'nuff said on that
topic vbg)
They stop that sort of fun after
Just saw this on a newsgroup:
http://www.sciencephotography.com/users/ekinsman/snow2004/snow2004.html
Nice snowflake shots!
--
Mark Roberts
On a Mac they melt (no screensaver...)
ANdre
First, forget the MZ7
Then, using a MZ, it is better to be handled with the grip
all have disconnectable bip sound
MZ5n to be prefered than the MZ5
MZ6 is a good felow, but different handle than MZ5n
Viewer is quite same with Z1p
Considering to buy MZ-5/6/7 as backup camera. I would like to
Hello Shel,
When I was doing that, I got one from Adorama that had a built in
counter and a light trap that didn't start to scratch like the felt
ones. It was around $40 a few years ago. I rather liked it.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 8:05:58 AM, you wrote:
SB Been
Shel, what you want is a loader where the film does not touch
anything, like felt. The Watson is one of them. $26 US new. eBay
must have lots of them. You loose about 1 and a half end shots,
which is annoying when you just have caught that flying saucer. It's
worth it to do the initial
Thanks for the link, Mike. I enjoyed watching his pictures immensly.
See also below.
From: mike.wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He's not at all famous and probably never will be. But what he's done,
for me, eclipses the works of greater photographers. He lived in the
My humble opinion is that the shot is too tight the background triangle in the ULH
corner is distracting. I like the overall effect though.
Only my opinion.
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW
My humble contribution for this week.
From: Dag T [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, since you ask and the guy asked me to try if his web site works on
with Safari two days ago I (Norway is a small country) choose to show
you my favorite Norwegian photographer:
www.paalfoto.no
Not all his best are there yet,
(some are here
Great stuff, Mike. The story is especially compelling.
Haven't had a chance to see all the photos yet, but the
story really touches me ... having to wait twenty years to
see the prints!
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
From: mike.wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He's not at all famous
Fred wrote:
The A 24-50 is a constant f/4 and has the A contact, and seems to
be built nearly to the M 24-35 standard, _much_ better than the A
35-70, for instance, in terms of build quality.
Ironically, I find the A35-70 to be a much better lens optically.
The A 35-70/4 is
Thanks for the links guys. Yang's were good pictures.
Must admit I didn't know about the magazine, or just haven't paid attention.
I will most definitely spend some time at their site.
Lasse
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
The shot seems a bit soft and here that works for me. I also like the
model's gaze. What is slightly bothersome to me, is that the shot
seems too straight. Just a slight side tilt of her head or the camera
would feel more comfortable to me.
I assume you took a series of shots. It would be
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 08:05:58 -0800
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Been thinking about getting a bulk film loader. Is anyone
still using these things. Which brands are considered
better? I'd want a very good quality loader and don't mind
paying a little extra for it.
Yup.
Bob,
Thanks for the comments. This type of shot is less typical of what is
shown within the PDML and it seems that there are quite varying
opinions - all equally valid.
The attempt was to produce a dreamy shot. The soft focus has some
impact as does the pose and setting. In the first image,
Butch,
I just responded to Bob S. about the two shots. Perhaps what is
bothersome about the first shot is that their attention is divided.
He is looking at the camera and she is not. If he were looking at her
or something like that, it might feel comfortable.
Soft focus is quite tricky,
More ...
They're going really cheap right now used.
Mine were in good shape for about $5 each, as always garage-sale specials.
Midwest Photo has a bunch of them piled up.
I think they ask around $10 each.
http://www.mpex.com
Collin
Hi!
BD I don't have a soft focus lens in 35mm (sold it to Boris) and so
BD haven't really played much yet with that style on the *istD. The
BD focal lengths that Pentax offers just don't seem to be right. With
BD the 67, the 120mm gave a equivalent of about 60mm which worked for
BD both couples
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?ci=1sb=pspn=1sq=descInitialSearch=yesO=SearchBarA=searchQ=*shs=watson+loaderimage.x=0image.y=0
This is the one. The Volkswagon. $18 new at BH.
Andre
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlistA=detailsQ=sku=31737is=REG
To avoid. Has felt and more expensive. $30.
Users will probably tell you they are OK and they might be right, but
why have felt running over the film when you can do without.
LOL!
Good one, Bob.
Still chuckling...
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 4:41 PM
Subject: OT: The new product range from Apple...
http://www.electric-chicken.co.uk/
On 24/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
And hasn't Cotty presented us with some
neat Canon (whoops, C***n) images? Guess he'd better lose
the camera or get outta here.
In mitigation your honour, my PUG images are courtesy of a Pentax lens :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
I have an Elmar 135 f4 (M). Can I unscrew the head?
I can only unscrew a little aluminum ring under the aperture ring.
It uncovers some screws. Should I go on?
If it unscrews, I could maybe adapt the head to a Pentax zoom tube.
Andre
Hi,
should have been called the i-Cac.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 3:41:39 PM, Rob wrote:
http://www.electric-chicken.co.uk/
Thanks for the comments Lasse. I will consider your
tips to get out of my bad photo moment. To shoot
commercially is very hard here, too small a market and
a lot of very good photographers filling the niche,
but nothing is impossible. Luck is always around the
corner.
Regards.
Albano
---
Shel,
Just in case you go for print film, try Agfa Ultra
100, very Velvia like but with the versatility of neg
film.
Regards
Albano
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Been thinking about experimenting with a saturated
and
contrasty transparency film like Velvia for rainy
Hi,
seems very unfair to do porridge just for sppeding.
but you never know if that's the only cop or if they're doing a sting
and there's a gaggle of em round the next bend.
Here in London you can drive clockwise most of the way around Hyde
Park, but when you get to Knightsbridge there's a
I'll post this again Friday, but here's an early notice:
For sale: Pentax SMC-M 100mm f/2.8 lens. EX condition with virtually
no body wear. Glass is clean with a very minor amount of dust specks
visible between elements. Includes original Pentax front and rear
caps. Diaphragm blades clean and
On 24/2/04, TAN THE FONDLER disgorged:
hehe, the challenge is on!
tan. (who fondles AS she photographs)
ps no wise arse comments about fondling, ok Cotty? hehe.
I'll let someone else have a go :-)
Cue Lasse...
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
Just put you photos up anywhere on the web, Bob. Then post a link to them here
on the list with the suject PAW:title.
--
Bob Poe wrote:
PAW good. Like pictures. Want to put pictures on
PAW. How?
Thanks,
Bob
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
You might as well accept people as they are,
you
On 24/2/04, DAN 'ZIPPY' MAYTOLA disgorged:
Mine was Mach 2.2 in a Phantom II fighter.
Shoot! Any astronauts on the list?
As George Kennedy said to a hapless Global Aiways pilot trying to taxi a
stuck 707 from the snow when he protested that he had clocked up half a
million miles in the air:
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/2/04, DAN 'ZIPPY' MAYTOLA disgorged:
Mine was Mach 2.2 in a Phantom II fighter.
Shoot! Any astronauts on the list?
Oh yeah, I've done quite a bit of space exploration, but that was back
in college.
Perhaps we're not talking about the same thing, though...
Remembering from the old days. Avoid the Lloyd as Andre says. The Watson is the
old standby but only gives approximate frame counting (friction drive counter).
The Alden is the deluxe unit that will give very accurate frame counting
(counter like in a camera). However, I have no idea how these
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 24/2/04, TAN THE FONDLER disgorged:
hehe, the challenge is on!
tan. (who fondles AS she photographs)
ps no wise arse comments about fondling, ok Cotty? hehe.
I'll let someone else have a go :-)
Cue Lasse...
Yes, yes, Cotty... You want me to have
Neat, informative web site - nice job. Good luck
with the racing, try to keep the shiney side up.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: Making a milion $ racing - WasWAY OT -
Thanks Bill. No this PAW image wasn't in the show but did come from the same
shoot as other images in the show.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bill Sawyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PAW
Terrific, Ken. Did I see this shot in your show?
Site is well done, too.
On 24 Feb 2004 at 17:10, Mark Cassino wrote:
What I can't figure out is how these folks get the mixed lighting - the two
colors - in their shots. I did tons of experiments using dual colored flashes
(I usually use two flashes, one blue, one white) but I could not get the nice
liquid colors
I jutst wanted to say that I own this lens and it's a
GREAT performer, fast and compact, sharp with good
bokeh.
So, if you need a short tele... BUY IT NOW!
Regards
Albano
--- Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll post this again Friday, but here's an early
notice:
For sale: Pentax
On 25 Feb 2004 at 22:18, Winston wrote:
I
wished Pentax makes something wider than 31mm and longer than 100mm
Limited lenses. I'm not satisfied with the FA 24/2. Too much distortion,
and sharpness could be better at wide f-stops.
Same here, pity the 14/2.8 was a DA not a LTD :-(
Rob
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25 Feb 2004 at 22:18, Winston wrote:
I
wished Pentax makes something wider than 31mm and longer than 100mm
Limited lenses. I'm not satisfied with the FA 24/2. Too much distortion,
and sharpness could be better at wide f-stops.
Same here, pity the
From: Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll second that. 43 is an excellent lens, it's just that the optimum
performance comes 'late' at f/8-f/11.
I get the impression that this is fairly typical for Pentax designs.
Is this because they use fairly simple and traditional optical formulas,
or perhaps
On 25 Feb 2004 at 15:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most modern Nikon lenses seem to peak about f/5.6-f/8.0 which is a better
fit for me--I rarely see f/11! With few exceptions, most lenses are
pretty nasty both wide open and fully stopped down (due to diffraction).
Most modern Pentax lenses
Sorry Bill, but with respect, I have to agree with Lasse here. I too, felt
that the shot appeared to be too dark. It is kind of muddy on my screen
which is callibrated sRGB.
I have done very similar tight crops on many occasions and love to break
the rules, but for some reason, whether it be
Ya gots ta hit us first, Keith.
BTW, maybe that's why we wear our courier bags nice and low...
vbg
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
They stop that sort
Terrific gnus, Marnie!!
Woo Hoo! This is gonna be some shindig!
(did I just say shindig?) vbg
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and that bloody photography
list. I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot
is safe! He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and
meeting with a bunch of internet stalkers, lol, his words, not mine!
You are
I dunno.
Spotmatic was a pretty cool name, IMHO.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: David Madsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Asterisks
Not really, like I said, 77 is an outstanding example. Very sharp across
the f/stops at least from wide opened to f/11. I never used anything
smaller than f/11. But I agree that some new Nikons are best at f/5.6,
like the 17-35/2.8 and other fast zooms/primes.
I agree too that Nikon 24/2 is not a
Mark, I'll have mine with me Sunday, if you want to compare the two for
settings.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Cassino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 25, 2004 11:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Mz-S RTF Flash Problem
I suspect that something is broken
In a message dated 2/25/2004 2:05:12 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Terrific gnus, Marnie!!
Woo Hoo! This is gonna be some shindig!
(did I just say shindig?) vbg
cheers,
frank
Sure sounds like it, Bill has told me lots of PDMLers will be there.
BTW, what other female
In a message dated 2/25/2004 1:09:12 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
web site.
So here's my Picture A Week - I promise to keep it to one a week.
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
taken @ White Sands, New Mexico.
Comments - good/
Hi Albano,
Albano Garcia wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the data. With style I referred to his way
to photograph people posing smiley and happy to do so,
looking friendly and proud of their existences. I like
this kind of portraits, no matter if they are more or
less documentary than no posed
Bruce,
I think him looking at her is on the right track.
The first shot is very pretty and dreamy, but the body language is wrong.
He's looking at us and she's contemplating something.
Better is your suggestion of him looking at her looking at the bouquette.
Clearly, the first shot has something
What's even more bizarre is that this is the second time I've
mis-spelled bizarre on the list. Maybe it's my lack of pzzazz
m
David Madsen wrote:
The * (asterisk) on the ist and istD are similar to the star on the FA*
lenses, which are similar to the Zeiss T* symbol. But, you are
Yes, it sounded like something to remove spots from your trousers.
--
frank theriault wrote:
I dunno.
Spotmatic was a pretty cool name, IMHO.
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not going to be able to change them anyway.
Well, you had 30 years for it to grow on you who knows *ist may seem to
be a cool name in 30 years.
frank theriault wrote:
I dunno.
Spotmatic was a pretty cool name, IMHO.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert
On 25/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I would suggest a West London venue, perhaps starting at the pubs by
Hammersmith
Bridge and heading west along the river. Especially on a late spring
or early summer evening.
--
Cheers,
Bob
That sounds perfectly fabulous. I love the river.
Cheers,
Nick,
I really like my MZ-S interface too. I would have been
happy if Pentax had just taken their MZ-D design (you
know, the full-frame DSLR that they never released) and
redone the electronics with a sensor like that in the
*istD. It would be s nice to have a consistent user
interface
Is the expressway that crowded every morning?
I'm so glad I don't have to commute! Where I live, it's 15 minutes from
downtown by bike, the same by car, and about 20 by subway.
An interesting, if dismal, photo. vbg
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
At 01:46 PM 2/25/2004 -0500, Robert Leigh Woerner wrote:
Does the flash work in servo mode?
I'm not sure what servo mode is - the AF? I tried it with AF disabled, to
no avail...
- MCC
-
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
http://www.markcassino.com
-
I have an F35-135, I don't know if its the same optical formula as the
A35-135, but mine is very soft optically.
rg
Andre Langevin wrote:
Well, I have repeatedly heard on the PDML that A35-105mm was one of
the best zooms made by Pentax. Although optically, not mechanically.
Some comments
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
