Yes, of course. My message was only meant to point out such a curiosity. Has
the *ist D been marketed under the Zx-D name in other countries too?
Dario Bonazza
- Original Message -
From: Michel Carrère-Gée [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 9:18 AM
Uncovered!!
Compare the graphics of ZzxD on the various images, in particular:
http://www.chalkak.co.kr/upload/imgPDS/PENTAX_zxD-b2-yo.jpg
http://www.chalkak.co.kr/upload/imgPDS/lift.jpg
Michel
http://www.chalkak.co.kr/board1/view.html?bID=Breviewnumber=433
Is this a joke?
The zxD logo seems very photoshopped to me.
--
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med dagens bild och allt!
Anders Hultman a écrit :
http://www.chalkak.co.kr/board1/view.html?bID=Breviewnumber=433
Is this a joke?
The zxD logo seems very photoshopped to me.
I am perplexed !!
I find with Google ZxD on sale at Camerabiz.
Just images modified for the Web in the absence of original images Here
the image
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Pentax Japan will probably never tell us what they use.
But we could work it out from the DOF scale on a DA lens. Assuming they
have them. Anyone? :-)
S
I'm not an expert, but I had a go at it.
It's a difficult one, with all those colour shifts and a time consuming task with all
those spots and artifacts.
I spent some 30 minutes on it.
There is a lot more, and different methods, that could be done to it.
(I also saved a tif of it, in case you or
I'm not an expert, but I had a go at it.
It's a difficult one, with all those colour shifts and a time consuming task with all
those spots and artifacts.
I spent some 30 minutes on it.
There is a lot more, and different methods, that could be done to it.
(I also saved a tif of it, in case you or
I think that some pictures used in the test report were standard *ist D
images by Pentax, so that they had to be photoshopped for becoming zxD.
Then, the *ist D was made as the zxD for the Koren market, hence you can see
genuine zxD pictures, box, etc.
Dario
- Original Message -
From:
In order to prevent being overloaded by thousands of messages while I'm away
on vacation, I'm going to unsubscribe for a while. I'll be back around Aug
16.
In the mean time, I'll suggest to keep your eyes open for Pentax news over
the coming weekend...
All the best
Dario Bonazza
ping
Dario Bonazza wrote on 06.08.04 12:00:
In order to prevent being overloaded by thousands of messages while I'm away
on vacation, I'm going to unsubscribe for a while. I'll be back around Aug
16.
Have fun then! And take zillion of beautiful photos with DSLR ;-)
In the mean time, I'll suggest
Bob W wrote on 06.08.04 12:13:
ping
gong :-)
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
You'd need 200 mb .LOL
Welcome back.
Dave
For those wondering what happened to me,
finally I
have a stable internet connection, added to Yahoo's
100 mb email upgrad I cn now resubscribe!
SO what have I missed?
g Think about something here. HCB used a Leica. A Leica RF. A Leica RF's frame
g lines do not perfectly define the negative borders. There is no way he could
g frame his photos that precisely. But claiming that he did made him famous. There
Hi Tom,
great that somebody finally wrote this
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
In order to prevent being overloaded by thousands of messages while I'm
away
on vacation, I'm going to unsubscribe for a while. I'll be back around
Aug
16.
Have fun then! And take zillion of beautiful photos with DSLR ;-)
If I'm allowed by family (as demanding as
As opposed to assholes with macros taking closeups of bugs and flowers with
(D)SLR's that only show a portion of the frame?
And one guy from Magnum, expressing a personal opinion, now gives rise to a
generalization of the man's character? Most people, especially successful
and creative people,
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
is awfully big fo carry-around. In that range a more compact
f4 lens I find more suitable.
And that's me at a full circle. I know of no AF lens at this aperture
for Pentax. Except perhaps the SMC-F 70-210 and perhaps the new Sigma
with the extra
Just a wee note for the sake of it: I dropped what used to be Jaume
Lahuerta's AF500FTZ and broke the IR cover and the battery door, so I
got a local shop to order them for me. While I was at it, I ordered
the hood for the 24-90. It was still May when I did that. The IR cover
arrived fairly
I especially like this one:
Wood screw building the lenses ???
All the best
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Michel Carrère-Gée [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. august 2004 09:18
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Pentax Zx-D
So the lenses are kept together by wood screws carved out of the Vietnamese
trees by Nguyen, I suppose :-)
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 2:28 PM
Subject: SV: Pentax Zx-D in Korea
I especially like this
I have put myself on a budget, so I am just using an old Velbon head
(traditional video pan-and-tilt), I got from a broken tripod. It's fine when
I use it with the tilting handle pointing the same way as the lens.
For my normal Manfrotto tripod (190B) I use a Bogen/Manfrotto 3030 head.
BTW:
Very moving Shel.
Norm
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Another portrait from the series on Shattuck Avenue. This woman recently
lost her husband, her kids are scattered about the globe, and many of her
friends and immediate family have moved away or passed on. Yet her best
friend is always there for
It says a lot, more than I can put into words
Norm
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/shattuck/palm01.html
Part of an ongoing series of life on Shattuck Avenue in Berkeley.
Hi!
After this weekend I will be un-subscribing from PDML until the end of
the month or so. I am going on a vacation...
Watch for pictures after we return...
Boris
Glad to hear that.
BTW, it happens that I do copywriting work for Bogen Imaging Italy
(distributors for Manfrotto and other stuff), for their InVista magazine. In
this coming issue, just printed, a Ferrari picture by me has been published
too. Not sure if I've been paid for that, since we agreed a
Hi Simon
Thanks for the feedback. I think I took my fair share of postcard cliches
that day!
This photo was a couple of years ago but I was in Canberra a few weeks ago and
escaped unmolested by rampant roos ..
Cheers
Brian
+
Great, Dario. Can we get to see the photograph/fferrari?
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Dario Bonazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. august 2004 15:12
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: OT: Manfrotto Monopod enabled
I'm selling my little Optio 220. The 220 is a great carry-everywhere
camera. Might make a nice gift for your favorite point-and-shooter.
Very good condition - there are a small nick on the front edge and a
couple of small scuffs on the edge of the lens housing.
2 megapixels
Flip-out screen for
The following message was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri,
6 Aug 2004 03:18:22 -0400.
Whilst on the subject of Manfrotto monopods, What heads are folks out there
using, and why that particular head?
Kind regards
Kevin
None. I just mount the lens/camera directly onto the 'pod.
When I
I'm pretty sure Frank is older than that.
Actually considering the point of the post, just thinking of a
photograph as something that takes time to setup could be a valuable
lesson. What camera was it? Not the 67? That thing is bigger than
most 3 year olds.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/5/2004 9:09:12
Hi John
not this time, no special story :-)
Don't know what happened to her eyes, the red is only on this picture.
thanks for your email.
Markus
Wow! What did you (or she) do to get her eyes so red! Very interesting
photo. Is there a story behind it?
Here is another shot I took with the
Not only that, but they did a bad job of changing the name everywhere.
They tried to fix the image of the camera box by manipulating the image,
so they fixed the sides, but they completely forgot to fix the name on
the top of the box!! LOL.
rg
Michel Carrère-Gée wrote:
Dario Bonazza a écrit :
It came from that series I shot last February at Imola track, but is not one
of those I already published in my website:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/f1_04e.htm
Here is the Manfrotto magazine page, including the picture:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/paw/neotec.jpg
Dario
- Original Message
Not only that, but they did a bad job of changing the name everywhere.
They tried to fix the image of the camera box by manipulating the image,
so they fixed the sides, but they completely forgot to fix the name on
the top of the box!! LOL.
rg
But IMO it *is* a better name ... :-)
ERN
It was the Super Program, I was afraid the tripod might fall over with
the 6x7 and injure him g I put it on the tripod and asked him where he
wanted it then he did the rest... Unfortunately, he's seen a few of
Frank's photos.
Norm
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I'm pretty sure Frank is older than
Hi Pentax lovers
I really hope you enjoy seeing this pictures as much as I am rediscovering
them after more than 20 years.
I will post some more of (then) hidden China and Australia and Suez and crew
members at work later, if nobody complains.
The first series of photos was made with a compact
Hi Jerome
I like the clean look of your website, the navigation and the photos of
course too.
I run my monitor at 1280x960 and I think it would be good if the main page
would fit on one side at
maybe a bit less than 1024X768 resolution.
Then, most of the surfers would see all of it at once without
You could not go far wrong with an M28/3.5 and an M135/3.5 as a starter outfit.
Cheap, excellent optics.
The 135 is really only excellent as a portrait lens for tight head shots, but
then 1/2 length or more works will with your 50mm, thus only compromising on
head and shoulder shots. The 28mm
You may search eBay for SMC-M 28/2.8, SMC-A 28/2.8, SMC-M 100/2.8, SMC-A
100/2.8, SMC-A 70-210/4. SMC-M 135/3.5 is good, cheap, and plentiful as
well, but you may find the gap between 50mm and 135mm a little big. SMC-A
35-105/3.5 is a very good zoom worth to consider too. All these are common
Hi,
I got this offlist e-mail from a lurker (doesn't that sound bad?). He asked
that I forward it to the list. So here you go.
[...]
Thank you,
Melchi
Thank you. I hope you will start to post more often to the list,
rather than remain a lurker. We need more people who can express
FYI,
This ends tonight:
NEW Pentax Screwmount Bellows and TWO Macro lens M42
NEW IN BOX Auto Bellows and High Quality Optics! Item number: 3831257254
http://jcoconnell.com/JCO_AUCT.HTM
J.C. O'Connell
Hi Paul, and welcome to you.
It sounds reasonable to me to use film for a trip like that.
A 135mm is a fin e portrait lens for outdoor purposes. Indoo it's often to
long - a 105 or 85 mm might be better there.
For inddor a 24mm is good, cause you can frame all the people at the dinner
table - a
I agree, graywolf. Also when I am walking in nature the terrain may not be
flat and I may not be able to hold the monopod straight all the time.
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt:
First of all, thanks for the awesome help.
Of course your help leads me to having other questions:
Are the Sears K Mount lenses worth buying? Were they made by Pentax?
Specifically the 135mm 2.8?
Are there any 3rd party lens manufacturers that you can recomend 100%? And
any to totally avoid?
Just a wee note for the sake of it: I dropped what used to be Jaume
Lahuerta's AF500FTZ and broke the IR cover and the battery door, so I
got a local shop to order them for me. While I was at it, I ordered
the hood for the 24-90. It was still May when I did that. The IR cover
arrived fairly
if you use a screw mount adapter on a k mount body do you lose the ability
to use the light meter? I'm a little confused about that.
Thanks
Paul
The following message was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri,
6 Aug 2004 13:19:44 -0400.
From: graywolf
I am always reading this, you don't need a head on a monopod thing.
I do not agree.
That's allowed vbg
Since the way I use a monopod is to slope it back towards me while I lean
I got one of these lenses a few years ago for $100 a millimeter! I used it
a few times but found it just too heavy for my Tiltall tripod. I got good
results, however. I got the cannon to add to my collection of SMC Takumar
lenses. I personally like the SMC 300mm Takumar because it has auto
The M series lenses are all pretty small, light and inexpensiveif
your looking for a 135mm, don't waste your time with the Sears, the
price difference between it and a Pentax is not that great. M135's on
Ebay are common and inexpensive ($60) and have great glass.
I don't know about 3rd
Hi,
Paul McEvoy wrote:
I'm new here
Greetings.
As far as the wide angle goes is it worth trying to hunt down a 24mm or
is 28mm just as good?
Pentax used to make a 24-35 zoom. It's not fast and there is some
distortion at wider angles but it is sublimely sharp. Should be
available in user
Third party a 100% recommendation?? Well, nothing is 100%, not even Pentax.
They all make lenses for different purposes, or valids. So check out tests
(i.e. www.photodo.com). But I kinda agree with Norm.
But, anyway, I beleive I can recommend Tamrons (i.e. Adaptall mounts and
especially SP ones),
Hi,
Jim Apilado wrote:
I got one of these lenses a few years ago for $100 a millimeter!
You paid $50,000 for a lens? Will you be my friend?
mike
Shel wrote:
As opposed to assholes with macros taking closeups of bugs and flowers with
(D)SLR's that only show a portion of the frame?
REPLY:
Thse assholes are at least not pretentious assholes claiming they make a statement
socially, or about the meaning of life and the fate of the
I wouldn't pay $100 a millimeter for ANY lens even a super wide angle!
:)
JCO
-Original Message-
From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 3:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: feedback wanted--SMC Takumar 500/4.5
Hi,
Jim Apilado wrote:
I got
Hi,
Things are slow right now because they are preparing for the Ulan Bator rollout.
...of the Genghist-D.
...specially adapted for shooting from horseback.
--
Cheers,
Bob
You beat me to it!
lol
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
Jim Apilado wrote:
I got one of these lenses a few years ago for $100 a millimeter!
You paid $50,000 for a lens? Will you be my friend?
mike
should
be looking for a 100mm prime lens for the portrait lens, but I can't seem
to
find much on ebay. Actually none, except for some screw mounts. There
are
a lot of 135mm lenses. Would the do similar things?
The normal portrait lens range is 85-120mm, but a 135 might work for
some
Hey for once I agree with Pål! Mostly.
Tom C.
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: So What's So Great About HCB? Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 21:09:35
+0200
Shel wrote:
As opposed to assholes with macros taking closeups of bugs and flowers
Melchi wrote:
Personally, I love photojournalism (good photojournalism) and I think it represents
the highest form of photographic art. This despite the fact that I rarely do any
photojournalistic photography and when I do, I don't do it very well. Most people who
are into photojournalism will
Give me a sunset any day. It doesn't pretend anything. Pål
Well stated
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: So What's So Great About HCB?
Shel wrote:
As opposed to assholes with macros taking closeups of bugs and flowers with
(D)SLR's
Don't forget the camera position, not the lens determines
the perspective. So a 85mm might be ideal for a head and shoulders/upper
body
shot while a 135mm might me perfect for a very tight head shot BOTH
with identical perspective and taken from same camera position!
JCO
-Original
I will sell you my Tamron adaptall 28mm f2.8 in excellent condition if you
can get an adaptall mount your self. I never ever use it, because I also
have a Pentax A 28mm. My adaptall mount I will keep - it is sitting on my
3.5/75-150mm Tamron, which is quite good for candid portraits.
Why don't
Shel wrote:
As opposed to assholes with macros taking closeups of bugs and flowers with
(D)SLR's that only show a portion of the frame?
You can get an a*e with a macro lens now? Cool.
Tom C.
Hi,
Friday, August 6, 2004, 8:24:37 PM, Pål wrote:
If you look at many of the price winning photograph in
photojournalism the only merrit seem to be showing something
terrible with no other artistic values.
Photojournalism has nothing to do with artistic values, it is about reporting
news in
graywolf wrote:
I am always reading this, you don't need a head on a monopod thing.
I do not agree.
Understand.However, I have yet to need one. I like the simplicity
of just the monopod (nice walking stick :-\ ), and for what I do, it
works just fine without a head. Have looked at heads
No really, creativity is not limited by the aspect ratio of your camera
given you can crop a square from a rectangle and/or a recgangle from a
square. In over 30 years of shooting I have never once lamented the aspect
ratio of the camera I was using, it really is a non issue.
Antonio
On 6/8/04
Hello all...
Last month, I had my youngest daughter spend some time in front of the
camera with the intention of giving an enlargement to my wife as an
anniversary present. I've gotta hand it to pros to do this for a living: the
patience of a saint is required to get good photos of babies.
That's true - in theory. But who would crop a 28 or 35mm shot so much it
looks like it was shot with a 85mm ? And annother thing. Wouldn't the DOF be
different? I mean the cropped 28mm picture (85mm look-alike-crop) vs. the
true 85mm shot?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Each to his own, reading your posts on this topic it is obvious that you
dont like people at all, although I suspect that necrofilia might be just up
your street ...
Give me a sunset any day. It doesn't pretend anything. Pål
Dont forget the different AOV between an 85mm and 135mm lens - I am getting
rid of my SMC 135/2.5 - nice as it is I just dont use it. The SMC 85/1.8 and
105/2.8 cover that range very nicely for me. In fact I have ended up selling
all the 135mm lenses I have owned over the years - it just seems
Ouch.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/6/2004 4:17:19 PM
Shel wrote:
As opposed to assholes with macros taking closeups of bugs and flowers
with
(D)SLR's that only show a portion of the frame?
You can get an a*e with a macro lens now? Cool.
Tom C.
Well, I'm in between you two. I use a head on the monopod for two
purposes - one is quick release, the other is for vertical shots with
lenses that do not have a tripod mount.
The head I use is very minimalist - Manfrotto 3229 - just swivels one
way. So it functions almost like no head unless
Hello Tim,
I vote for #3. Cute shots, all of them. I doubt she would be
disappointed with any choice.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, August 6, 2004, 1:37:37 PM, you wrote:
TS Hello all...
TS Last month, I had my youngest daughter spend some time in front of the
TS camera with the
Bob:
Photojournalism has nothing to do with artistic values, it is about reporting
news in the most effective way possible.
Any artistic value that photojournalism acquires is secondary.
REPLY:
Sure, but that doesn't prevent such images being prized and judged on artistic
merrits. At least
Actually, I read somewhere that Canon has an AF lens in the 1200 range
that costs 50-70 thousand dollars. I found it on there site, but there
was no price given.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/6/2004 3:09:43 PM
I wouldn't pay $100 a millimeter for ANY lens even a super wide angle!
:)
JCO
-Original
Antonio wrote:
Each to his own, reading your posts on this topic it is obvious that you
dont like people at all, although I suspect that necrofilia might be just up
your street ...
REPLY:
I like beer but I don't photograph it, I drink it..
I have nothing against people photography. What I
I did not get Jens Bladt's message below directly via the PDML,
only as part of someone else's reply.
but if it was a reply to me I do not understand your comments.
My point is that a natural perspective is achieved by being
the right DISTANCE from the subject of the portrait, the right
framing
Coming back to the no-cropping issue. Surely there was a practical
aspect to that. HCB did not usually print his own pictures, and as a
photo-journalist might at times have had no input into the printing at
all. That being the case, a permanent injunction against cropping would
have
That still isnt $100 a mm now is it??? The most expensive lenses per mm
are the super wide angles. I paid $50 per mm for my 15mm F3.5 SMCT,
($750).
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Steve Desjardins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 5:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pal said:
The problem I have with photo journalism is that a larger percentage of
it sucks more than any other kind of photography I can think of.
This is a question of perspective. Speaking as a photojournalist I'd say
that a larger percentage of wedding photography sucks because it all
Hi,
Of course there are good reason for photograph terrible deeds but
when these photographs are being marketed or published as art in
spite of being accidental snapshots, not a product of an unique or
sensitive vision, the whole thing becomes highly speculative,
perhaps you could back up
What about AOV? The main reason I love my 85mm for portaits is the AOV it
provides. Shure I could stand a bit further back with a 135mm, and even get
the same DOF by using a slightly larger f stop, but the AOV would still be
different. If lens choice were merely a matter of where to you want to
But it is always easier to shoot the messenger...
A.
On 6/8/04 11:29 pm, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the violence is not in the media, it is in the world.
Hey Folks,
Unemployment sucks so I've got lotsa stuff for sale.
1) Pentax ZX-7, Excellent condition. Hardly any signs
of use. Mechanically perfect. Comes w/ AF Quantaray
28-90 zoom (some scuffs on the body - glass clean),
55mm skylight filter, 55mm circular polarizer, Cambron
AF 1.4
Yeah, but I wonder if its SMC?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: So What's So Great About HCB?
Shel wrote:
As opposed to assholes with macros taking closeups of bugs and flowers
with
(D)SLR's that only show a portion of the frame?
Is this what's known as the A* Macro? I think I read something about Aloe in
the coating.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 6:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: So What's So Great About HCB?
Yeah, but I
And Bob is what you call the same guy in the water.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: So What's So Great About HCB?
'Art' is what you call a man with no arms and no legs hanging on the wall.
Tom C.
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know about that... :) I just wonder where the tripod goes. I imagine
it could be good for closeup water shots, as long as flash was used.
Tom C.
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: So What's So Great About HCB?
Date: Fri,
If he's water skiing his name is Skip.
Tom C.
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: So What's So Great About HCB?
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 19:46:24 -0400
And Bob is what you call the same guy in the water.
Kenneth Waller
-
I don't see how the marketing of photojournalism as art or otherwise
has anything to do with the merit of the photographer, HCB or anyone
else. Any reasonably discerning viewer would know to judge the piece
in question based on what it is, not what it is claimed to be. Do
you really believe
How about a collage, they're all damn good :) If you're only going to
use one, I'd pick # 2. All three are cute but the direct eye contact
in # 2 makes it my pick.
Good job!
Badri
I realize that many of you would suggest that I just get a real camera,
but I was wondering if anyone on the list might know a part# and or
vendor to get a replacement focusing screen for a ZX-30. I scratched
mine badly while trying to remove some foreign objects, and it is now
really annoying
I read with great interest what people here say about HCB and
photojournalism.
Of course, good or bad sample photo links would add a lot for me and make
some point of views clearer and spicier too :-)
I'm positive influenced on photo journalism, because one of my personal
favorite photos from my
You can visit Trillium Lake where you get a different view of Mt. Hood.
Visit Timberline Lodge, too. If I were coming down I-5 (from Washington
State?), I would take I-84 east to Hood River, Oregon and then drive south
on Highway 35. You can also get to Lost Lake that way, too.
Too bad you
hi Norm
thanks for your email, I am glad that you like the pics.
Considering that it was the first time I had a camera in my hands I am a
still a bit impressed with the
chosen compositions despite the technical shortcomings :-)
So, would you like to see more of them?
happy pentaxing
Markus
-
Edwin wrote:
Artistic value is not at the top of the list for photojournalism.
Pal's REPLY:
. However, my issue was
that
when artistic factors supposedly are indeed put at the forefront for
judging
images lasting values beyond their immediate context, then one should
expect artistic
Pål We have something in common!
Norm
Pål Jensen wrote:
I like beer
I don't believe so.
Norm
Paul McEvoy wrote:
if you use a screw mount adapter on a k mount body do you lose the
ability to use the light meter? I'm a little confused about that.
On 6 Aug 2004 at 18:56, Otis Wright wrote:
The quick release feature is certainly a strong plus. If I used the
monopod more.
Manfrotto have standard QR bases that will screw straight into the top of the
334B or similar monos.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
Markus, is that your photo or someone else's?
Norm
Markus Maurer wrote:
Have a look at an example of good photo journalism imho:
The photographer is unknown to me, the Book is called Zurich against
Zurich - Zürich gegen Zürich:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2587369
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
