Graywolf wrote:
Many of us here on the list sound a lot like those folks who screamed
because their car no
longer came with a starting crank.
I still do, but it was only a few years ago. I'm still getting used to wind
up windows. Isn't technology great :-)
Malcolm
Ah so.
Nikon is still hungery! I assume this is 35mm
sized?
John
--- Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0409/04091605nikond2x.asp
Velly intellesting - they've used CMOS sensor
for the first time :-)
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
=
John
MLU is the forgotten anti-shake technology used
in the obsolete g analog cameras!
John
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't give one whit about the frame rate
(anything would be quicker
than my TLR) or the lack of MLU (that's what
the B
Wow. What were they thinking. Must have been in the pipeline and would
have cost more to kill it than to sell a couple thousand and then kill it.
Graywolf wrote:
http://nikonimaging.com/global/news/2004/0916_02.htm
He, he, told you so...
Very interesting photo Juan.
Is it partially a painting or bill board at the bottom.?
Very interesting colours and lines. I like the glass thingy bottom leftish.
Dave
With apologies to both Adams and Eggleston, a
silly picture of
beautiful Wyoming:
Fred that 33L is pretty sharp.Detail is great.
Looks like he's ready to run a race.
Nice one
Dave Brooks
After dinner I was sitting out on my deck
enjoying a coffee
when I noticed a wasp on my wooden patio table. It was walking
around a knot hole
Very nice shot. The various straight lines are very captivating. The shaows work to.
Gives
it some
errie depth.
Dave
http://www.g0nz.com/images/shadows.jpg
Comments, criticisms, ridicule, etc. welcome. Praise too!
rg
See, this is why i want to get a smaller digital camera.If i tried this with the D2h
they
would have been
home by the time i was ready.LOL
Nice shot Jens. The bouy on the right adds to the shot for depth i think. Nice coloues.
Dave Brooks
On my way home
Well it's not a snap dragon, why would he expect it to snap at him.
Cotty took a deap breath and gave forth::
On 16/9/04, Boros Attila, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://ns.atn.ro/~attila/album/view.php?i=6
This is also from the botanical garden. Perhaps someone who knows
flowers better than
Actually I believe that it is counter survival for them. But that's
only my belief. You can believe anything you want.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Trying it is one thing. Using it every day is another. When you use it
every day, it becomes second nature. You don't even realize you're
doing it.
Just use Genuine Fractals trial version, good up to 20 images (then it
stops). For really big prints (and even upsizing to e.g. 400 dpi Noritsu
prints at 30x40cm), it works better than just plain bicubic. Or at
least use Lanczos interpolation (in freeware IrfanView), it's quite better than
just
keller.schaefer mused:
If I remember correctly, operating the DOF preview lever around the shutter
release does the same than the green button in manual on the *ist D.
No - the DOF preview lever also activates the metering circuitry (so you can
check to see what the camera thinks the exposure
Hi,
If anyone has any expertise in the above, I am in desperate need of
assistance. Off list, please.
mike
Hi,
Malcolm Smith wrote:
Graywolf wrote:
Many of us here on the list sound a lot like those folks who screamed
because their car no
longer came with a starting crank.
I still do, but it was only a few years ago. I'm still getting used to wind
up windows. Isn't technology great :-)
No. The
Hi,
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Well it's not a snap dragon, why would he expect it to snap at him.
Cotty took a deap breath and gave forth::
On 16/9/04, Boros Attila, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://ns.atn.ro/~attila/album/view.php?i=6
This is also from the botanical garden. Perhaps someone who
Yes, you do like the odd mass-debate!
A.
On 16/9/04 8:09 pm, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I voice my opinions. If you have a problem with
my points, argue the points. To say I just argue to argue
isnt valid. I argue the things I feel strongly about,
not to just get in
Brian, messages to and from the list have been dissapearing for a few months
now. Nobody seems to know why.
A.
On 16/9/04 4:41 pm, Brian Dipert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm hoping this makes it to the list; I'll check the archives later to see
if it did. I haven't gotten digest postings
Hi,
J Mason wrote:
Any suggestions / tutorials for mounting slides at home? Best
way to trim the frames? Sources for plastic slide mounts?
Funny you should ask, Shel. I've just been mounting slides for the
first time. Shot about 30 rolls of slide film in South Africa over
the summer. The
You are right ... but it SOUNDS the same ;-)
Sven
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: John Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. September 2004 20:27
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Use of Green Button (was Re: istDs - what a great camera!)
keller.schaefer mused:
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Looks like it's Rob's point, especially since the late and in some
quarters lamented MZ-D apparently had full K mount compatibility.
What you're saying is, a digi camera body the size of the MZ-D had the room,
and they did it, why not the ist-DS?
I don't know how the MZ-D
On 16/9/04, J. C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
I voice my opinions. If you have a problem with
my points, argue the points. To say I just argue to argue
isnt valid. I argue the things I feel strongly about,
not to just get in debates.
Excuse me but is the 5 minute argument or the
I still do, but it was only a few years ago. I'm still getting used to wind
up windows. Isn't technology great :-)
mw No. The only problem I've ever had with sliding windows is when the
mw moss gets too thick in the groove.
Hm, what's a wind-up window? Best windows are of course the opening
Thursday, September 16, 2004, 9:41:58 PM, Cotty wrote:
C On 16/9/04, J. C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
I voice my opinions. If you have a problem with
my points, argue the points. To say I just argue to argue
isnt valid. I argue the things I feel strongly about,
not to just get in
Hi,
Hm, what's a wind-up window? Best windows are of course the opening
kind ;-) (I mean the normal ones, err, the most common ones, err, or
is it otherwise in your country g, the ones which open to the
outside or inside completely)
In World of Mike car windows have a metal lip on the top
Hi,
Frantisek wrote:
Hm, what's a wind-up window? Best windows are of course the opening
kind ;-) (I mean the normal ones, err, the most common ones, err, or
is it otherwise in your country g, the ones which open to the
outside or inside completely)
We are talking about cars. Electric, manual
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Hm, what's a wind-up window? Best windows are of course the opening
kind ;-) (I mean the normal ones, err, the most common ones, err, or
is it otherwise in your country g, the ones which open to the
outside or inside completely)
In World of Mike car windows have a metal lip on
I love watching you guys kick the shit out of each other. Really
entertaining.
On 16/9/04 12:40 am, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You still don't get it. Pentax didn't change their lens mount. K and M
lenses work just fine with the *istD. Nearly everyone on the list who
owns an
So why are you seling off all your screw moung gear if it is so good?
A.
On 15/9/04 10:03 pm, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spotmatic wasn't AE, It is not simpler than the spot F for
manual operation and not as simple as the ES/ESII for
auto operation. Why are you comparing to
Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html to see
where I spent my last two weeks.
Shot 18 rolls of Velvia/Provia 400F 1350 digital images with the * ist D.
Mostly with a 600mm FA and a 300MM FA.
Comments solicited.
WARNING: This image is a strong statement of the
And so do i.:-)
It seems fitting,tight crop showing a small object in ones hands. Did you do
any of the
hands and object.
Dave
On other occasions I did.
(Different year, different camera. Different miniatures, too!)
ERN
Great job, Cotty - I am glad that I could inspire you...
I haven't been hiding this photograph - I have actually posted a messages
about thi vertical shot.
So, I humbly admit to being part of this project, as this photograph is
originally captured by me on my Pentax *istD #5774808, yesterday
On 16/9/04, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
Great job, Cotty - I am glad that I could inspire you...
I haven't been hiding this photograph - I have actually posted a messages
about thi vertical shot.
Glad you took it in good humour Jens. Thanx
So, I humbly admit to being part of this
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Graywolf wrote:
While I agree with you, Kostas, about posting auctions. I think we can
equate top posters and bottom posters to top feeders and bottom feeders
(grin).
I have never commented on top-posting and I have never tried to change
the way people post I have found
Brian,
I have the same problem here since ~Sunday.
My digest subscription has disappeared - no more emails.
I've re-subscribed 2X, but no acknowledgement or email.
Tuesday, I subscribed to the direct list and got 150 messages.
I had to unsubscribe! Now back at the archives...
The only thing I
I am happy I got someone excited tonight!
-Original Message-
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: donderdag 16 september 2004 23:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: D*MNIT! A bargain hunter misses out.
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Graywolf wrote:
While I agree with
Wow! Great shot, Ken. I took one look and thought, Whoa, hope he shot
that with the 600. At least it wasn't a hungry wolf. Looks like the
bird is going to get the tender meat between those ribs. You have to
print this one big, really big. Is it cropped?
Paul
On Sep 16, 2004, at 4:52 PM,
Alin Flaider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sylwester wrote:
SP EOS-1Ds has similar noise level to coming from the same
SP era EOS-D60 or 10D despite having much bigger pixel pitch.
I think they have the same pixel pitch.
Yep. The 6-megapixel APS and 11 megapixel full-frame are very close
indeed.
Monkey or grand child?
:-)
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 16. september 2004 15:49
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: PESO: Monkey Hug
Nice, tender moment. The flash is
An interesting rhetorical device, changing the point from the technical
and or marketing reason to not include a feature to criticizing the form
factor as not being able to contain it. A bush league debating trick
which I'm not even going to answer. Simply put changing the subject
doesn't
If he'd shot it with a shorter lens the wolf probably wouldn't have been
there, they are quite shy and usually very afraid of humans, (with good
reason).
It is a great shot by the way.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Wow! Great shot, Ken. I took one look and thought, Whoa, hope he shot
that with the
reindeer meat? Humm...? Me thinks you have your tribal lore mixed.
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
Frantisek wrote:
Hm, what's a wind-up window? Best windows are of course the opening
kind ;-) (I mean the normal ones, err, the most common ones, err, or
is it otherwise in your country g, the ones which open
WTF?
Peter, you OK over there? Sounds like you are cracking up! LOL
A.
On 17/9/04 12:31 am, Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An interesting rhetorical device, changing the point from the technical
and or marketing reason to not include a feature to criticizing the form
factor as
All this reminds me of that electic car they invented with a 500 mile
range. The car was only $700. However the 500 mile long extension cord,
a required option, was $25000.
--
mike wilson wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Hm, what's a wind-up window? Best windows are of course the opening
kind ;-) (I
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:52:35 -0400, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html to see
where I spent my last two weeks.
Shot 18 rolls of Velvia/Provia 400F 1350 digital images with the * ist D.
Mostly with a 600mm FA and a
About 45 minutes spent fixing 2 broken traces on the flex-pc board above the
prism and good as new!
Not 100% mint, but I'd say about 99%. Even the mirror foam is still in great
shape!
Ohhh, Happy Happy Joy Joy, Happy Happy Joy Joy!
If any of you ever has an ME, ME Super, MG, etc, just go
Kenneth Waller wrote on 9/16/2004, 4:52 PM:
Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
to see
where I spent my last two weeks.
I hate you.
Mostly with a 600mm FA and a 300MM FA.
I hate you even more.
WARNING: This image is a strong statement of the
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Sep 16, 2004, at 7:52 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
You can still buy current lenses from Pentax with fully functional
aperture
rings, I'd like to be able to utilize the aperture ring control on the
current
cameras too.
This I don't get, so enlighten me. Why do you need to
Most of the people who think it's a problem haven't tried it. Or they
tried it once and decided it wasn't an optimum solution. Use it for two
weeks, and it's second nature. But the non-believers will never be
convinced. Sometimes I think that some people can't be content unless
they have
Thursday, September 16, 2004, 10:22:23 PM, Bob wrote:
BW Hi,
Hm, what's a wind-up window? Best windows are of course the opening
kind ;-) (I mean the normal ones, err, the most common ones, err, or
is it otherwise in your country g, the ones which open to the
outside or inside completely)
Peter, thanks for looking commenting.
You're correct about the lens comment. I've shot enough animal dots with
less lens to really appreciate the 600mm.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling Subject: Re: PAW: Action in Denali
If he'd shot it with a shorter lens the
You put it the wrong way. It should read: It's too bad BW is pretty
much worthless for digital.
;-) ;-)
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
While making coffee this morning I was thinking that it's too bad digital
is pretty much worthless for BW.
You put it the wrong way. It should read: It's too bad BW is pretty
much withless for digital.
;-) ;-)
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
While making coffee this morning I was thinking that it's too bad digital
is pretty much worthless for BW.
Please bring the print to our next Detroit PDML meeting. I'd love to
see it.
Paul
On Sep 16, 2004, at 8:35 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Paul,
Thanks for looking commenting. This was taken from a height of about
a
couple of hundred feet.
I actually sat for a while, with the wolf in the far
Frank, thanks for taking the time to look and comment.
There's only so much animal carcass one can film, the Magpies were sort of
comic relief.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault Subject: Re: PAW: Action in Denali
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:52:35 -0400, Kenneth
Yeah but I mostly love my 600mm - except for the weight.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW: Action in Denali
Kenneth Waller wrote on 9/16/2004, 4:52 PM:
Check out
That's a great shot!
Can you tell us a bit about it?
Don
-Original Message-
From: Frantisek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 7:36 PM
To: PDML
Subject: PESO - FireShow
No time at my hands for PAWs, so PESO now:
http://fotof.wz.cz/paw
All
PS This I don't get, so enlighten me. Why do you need to turn the aperture
PS ring if you can select the aperture with the cameras ap dial? What do
PS you gain by turning the ring?
PS Paul
Stepping in into this thread, my preference is to be able to have
tactile feedback of all my camera
I do take your point that the old glass is very good glass, but there is a
perfectly adequate method of using such lenses with the green button.
They have not been rendered obsolete, as some of the wilder-eyed posters
are implying.
For various reasons, Pentax now designs cameras that
does the *istD support autobracketing in any modes with
any lenses?
I ask because with the narrower latitude and free film of digital
capture
it seems to me that autobracketing AE would be ideal. There is no
way this could be done with the green button kludge with K/M
but I am wondering if istD
An A for creativity originality.
Now what is it?
I'm guessing its a grinder on some welded joints.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 8:35 PM
Subject: PESO - FireShow
No time at my
You can still check the DOF by stopping down, which to me, is better
than looking at the ap ring. But that's just me. If you use an A lens
on the *istD, you still get your DOF scale. Nothing different there
than you would get if you used it on an LX.
Don't get me wrong. I'm basically a
does the *istD support autobracketing in any modes with
any lenses?
I ask because with the narrower latitude and free film of digital
capture
it seems to me that autobracketing AE would be ideal. There is no
way this could be done with the green button kludge with K/M
but I am wondering if istD
Did you mention that they don't have AF, IS whatever ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've steered people to Pentax who are looking for a mid-priced DSLR. I simply tell them that they can find plenty of used lenses that are relatively inexpensive. That is a convincing argument for the *istD.
It supports bracketing even with K/M lenses.
John
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 20:48:10 -0400, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
does the *istD support autobracketing in any modes with
any lenses?
I ask because with the narrower latitude and free film of digital
capture
it seems to me that
Yes, the *ist D offers auto bracketing with A and newer lenses in 1/3
or 1/2 stop increments. However, I've found I can pretty much nail
exposures with this camera so I rarely use it. I do usually shoot with
+1/2 stop of exposure compensation. And of course PhotoShop CS RAW
converter gives you
The thing that I find inconvenient about the green-button-kludge (hereafter
referred to as GBK :) is not so much that I have any trouble with it, but it
makes it far more difficult to let anyone else take a shot.
For example, if we're out somewhere, my wife will sometimes want to take a
shot
I thought someone said that after green button
the shutter speed remains fixed until pressed again?
No?
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Peter Loveday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 8:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: istDs - what a great camera!
does
Thanks Peter. I didn't know auto bracketing worked with K and M lenses.
But I never tried it. As I mentioned in a previous post, it's not hard
to nail exposures with the *istD, and I seldom use auto bracketing. But
I will probably use it more often since it works with the old glass.
Paul
On Sep
I thought someone said that after green button
the shutter speed remains fixed until pressed again?
No?
Well, yes, in that the 'base' shutter speed remains fixed (unless you change
it manually, or press green) but bracketing still adjusts relative to this
base.
Love, Light and Peace,
- Peter
With the strobes, it wouldn't make a darned bit of difference. They
tend to fire a bit faster than the camera shakes. :-)
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 08:11:40 +0800, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mark
Fair point about the 1/2 - 1/30.
I use B and black velvet (to block out all extraneous
It does remain fixed, except for auto-bracketing. In a sense it is still
fixed then. The camera just takes a couple of shots at lower and higher
speeds than the fixed speed.
It's quite impressive.
John
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 20:59:11 -0400, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought
It seems to me they could allow another mode also; when in 'P', it could
stop the lens down when you press shutter (which it has to anyway) and take
an instantaneous reading at that point.
It may increase shutter-lag a little, but I expect the metering is quick
compared to the mechanical
Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mark
Fair point about the 1/2 - 1/30.
I use B and black velvet (to block out all extraneous light) when
shooting still lives with strobes 25 ISO film.
Would there be any point in using this technique with digital?
I don't see why not. Got any shots to show
Hmm, in relation also with another thread, if Nikon did actually produce
digital backs for the F6, as someone said was rumoured, they could produce
separate BW and Colour ones. So long as they were fairly easy to change,
that could be pretty nice...
Love, Light and Peace,
- Peter Loveday
Hehe, I knew it would happen! F6 looks like a great camera, did you
see the viewfinder coverage, 100% I also knew the APS sized sensor
in 35mm was just temporary, hehe. APS sized sensors are for APS
cameras I say!
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From:
and the old 15mm lens
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
While making coffee this morning I was thinking that it's too bad
digital
is pretty much worthless for BW.
Yes, but apparently if you select auto bracketing, it will shoot three
shots, varying the shutter speed by 1/2 spot.
On Sep 16, 2004, at 8:59 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I thought someone said that after green button
the shutter speed remains fixed until pressed again?
No?
JCO
-Original
Well, Ivan has come and gone for me.
I spent it at the folks. We lost power about 12:20 a.m. They are still
without power. Lost no shingles and only one piece of siding. All is
well - just a lot of limbs to clean up and the neighbor's fence went down.
My house - all is great! No shingles
Seems like this guy, T. R. Sanford, a frequent poster on the forum at
graflex.org, has a pretty good handle on what is happening with the film
business.
http://graflex.org/helpboard/viewtopic.php?topic=2850forum=47
If I understand him correctly, what he is saying is that Kodak, Agfa,
Ilford,
On 16 Sep 2004 at 20:28, John C. O'Connell wrote:
For the price of what a
*istD costs I am not going to buy into the argument
that full K/M support would have driven up the cost in
any signifigant way because K/M support was provided
on many budget cameras, pentax made and third parties.
Uh, the F6 doesn't have a sensor, it's a film camera. I'll be surprised
if they sell enough of them to cover the cost of the advertising, yet
alone the cost of development. I don't think you'll see another high
end film camera from Canon.
On Sep 16, 2004, at 9:10 PM, Steve Larson wrote:
Hehe,
On Sep 16, 2004, at 9:16 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
I beg to differ, the only way that I can produce very consistent
results WRT
exposure is to set the aperture from the lens, setting from the body
appears to
be accurate but the actual aperture isn't always stopped down by the
prescribed
amount.
Why is it worthless for the old 15mm lens? It should be a great *istD
lens, although the field of view won't be as wide.
paul
On Sep 16, 2004, at 9:19 PM, Steve Larson wrote:
and the old 15mm lens
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
While making coffee this morning I was
Good to hear you're well. Congratulations.
Paul
On Sep 16, 2004, at 9:14 PM, Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
Well, Ivan has come and gone for me.
I spent it at the folks. We lost power about 12:20 a.m. They are
still
without power. Lost no shingles and only one piece of siding. All is
well - just a
Ya!
--
Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
Well, Ivan has come and gone for me.
I spent it at the folks. We lost power about 12:20 a.m. They are still
without power. Lost no shingles and only one piece of siding. All is
well - just a lot of limbs to clean up and the neighbor's fence went down.
My house
For those interested, see story at BJP:
http://db.riskwaters.com/public/showPage.html?page=190734
Read carefully what it says about the digital solution for the M
system. It sounds like this will not be a digital back to fit existing
M cameras, but a digital body to accept M lenses.
Shel
I know, I was talking about Canon's decision. Sorry, should
have clarified it better.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: Film is dead, no one
The decision as to whether to add a $10.00 part to a $1500 retail
camera is always the same, does it add value to the product
to the customer? I honestly believe that would have added tremendous
value to a Lot of their customers (why buy a pentax DSLR if it wasn't
already for owning a lot of their
On 16 Sep 2004 at 21:27, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yes, but apparently if you select auto bracketing, it will shoot three
shots, varying the shutter speed by 1/2 spot.
On 16 Sep 2004 at 21:27, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yes, but apparently if you select auto bracketing, it will shoot three
shots,
On 16 Sep 2004 at 21:34, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Perhaps you're doing something wrong? My shots with A and FA lenses are
as accurate in terms of exposure as are my shots with M and K lenses,
where I set aperture on the lens. Even when you set aperture on the
lens, you're relying on a
This one has been known to attack humans (grin). It has also been known
to photograph humans feeding.
--
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Wolves have gotten a bad rap as being aggressive around humans. I have read
in several places that there has never been a documented case of a healthy
wolf attacking a
On 16 Sep 2004 at 7:47, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
For those interested, see story at BJP:
http://db.riskwaters.com/public/showPage.html?page=190734
Read carefully what it says about the digital solution for the M
system. It sounds like this will not be a digital back to fit existing
M
That's another great photograph, I hate you.
Frantisek wrote:
No time at my hands for PAWs, so PESO now:
http://fotof.wz.cz/paw
All comments welcome!
fra
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
and shoot
Yes your perfectly right your post is rubbish, and a not to the point.
The moderator would kick you out of the debate.
John Forbes wrote:
What rubbish.
How long do you want Pentax to keep supporting a product which is now
almost 30 years old? There IS a cost to it, and for most people,
there
Seems that the *ist-Ds will work like the zx-10, well sort of...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 16, 2004, at 7:52 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
You can still buy current lenses from Pentax with fully functional
aperture
rings, I'd like to be able to utilize the aperture ring control on the
101 - 195 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
