On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the meantime US tax dollars are providing 375 million dollars of aid.
That's almost two dollars per person. Not a bad number by any count.
True. But CNN's Anderson Cooper also added that even the $ amount sounded
large, to put it in perspective,
375 million USD is still a lot of money. I just hope teh aid gets there in
time!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Lawrence Kwan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 2. januar 2005 09:47
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re:
In total the aid for asia (yesterday) from all over the world has reached 2
billion USD (2,005,359,780 US Dollar).
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt
On 1/1/05, Fred Widall, discombobulated, unleashed:
There are so many excellent photographs published each month but these are
the ones which especially caught my eye.
Jan - Animals - Maya and Alex by Wendy Beard, Canada
Feb - Wet - Moss by Jostein Oksne, Norway
Mar - Portrait - Vix, Oxford,
I think one of the significant concerns is whether or not all this
money/aid gets distributed intelligently and rapidly. Already I've
come across reports of certain villages in Thailand/Sri Lanka
receiving overwhelming aid, and yet others being left more or less
alone in their need.
But at the
I was admiring that image earlier! (I'm a sucker for anything
trainish.) Full of life and youth! It would be uncharitable to saying
negative about it. It's just perfect the way it is. :-)
(and strangely enough, on the WA New page, your image is right next
to mine! strange coincidence) :-)
On
Hi Paul ...
Interesting perspective. A little unconventional but it works pretty well.
Thanks for the idea!
Shel
We had some decent light today, so I walked down the street to the marsh,
hoping to see some birds. I usually take the A 400/5.6 and a tripod or
monopod on such occasions,
Thanks Jens.
On Jan 2, 2005, at 1:54 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Brilliant shot. To me this is what photographing is about - getting
the shot
just right!
Regards
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Markus.
I think this is a very good shot.
You have captured a lot of creative juices here.
Dave
Late in this summer, I visited one of the alternative centers of culture,
the rote (red) Fabrik at lake Zurich.
I had to be careful not to be
Paul, I took another look at the pic ... meant to ask about the purple
fringing. Is that chromatic aberration or something else. It really makes
the lens far less useful ...
Shel
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3000223size=lg
Hi Juan.
I thought i had commented on this,but its still in my inbox,so i probably did
not.
However,..i like this one.
What i like is the woman,centre point of the photo,is not to blurred,but not to
sharp
either.
If her face had of been sharper, it would have really been dramatic,but i
Nice shot Kenneth
Its not to often one gets one of these in his backyard.
I thought a more tighter shot might have been better,but on second glance think
its olk
this way to.
Shows more of the habitat this way.
Optio series seem to produce decent pictures.
I shot some of these birds at a demo
Nice ornament Bill.
Nice job on the flash exposure. The all white face could be a problem,but the
Optio seemes
to have
done a good job.
Dave
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/peso/ornament1.html
A couple of our friends had a cottage industry creating
yes. algae for pink and just plain ice for blue and turquoise.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 1:23 AM
Subject: RE: Banff and Lake Louise
Very nice photographs. I couldn't help noticing a pink
the last few were also taken near sunset.
Herb
Some very nice shots here Andy.
I like what you have done with the BW images.
Dave
This is a set of photos taken on
Sunday at a studio
session with my
friend, Candy.
Lovely girl, isn't it? ^_^
Photos taken with *istDs, FA100/2.8, FA50/1.7,
Did you get a reply Bill.
I have one here at the house if you still need the measurments.
Dave
Could someone with one of these cameras
please
measure the
dimensiones of the eyepiece and send them to me?
I am trying to find an eyecup that will fit one of
I must have missed the first version.:-)
Interesting shot. I like the density(if thats a correct word) of the blue,with
the touches
of light on some
of the edges.
Is this all from the gels,or some PS magic.??
What is the glass sitting on. Looks like blue jellovbg(not trying to be rude
with
It's probably chromatic aberration. It's most evident in this kind of
shot, where the background is extremely bright. I corrected it somewhat
in the RAW conversion, but couldn't eliminate it completely. I think
even my A 400/5.6 would show some CA with this kind of background and
minimal depth
Decent shot Paul.
Seems the 80-320 gives farily good sharpness,at least on my humble Adobe
corrected
only,monitor.
g
The bit of purple fringe is a tiny bit distracting but at the same times adds a
bit of
funky to it. :-)
Do you find this lens does this alot,or just certain backgrounds and or
For someone who does not like the term 'Street Photoraphy',sure does a good job
of
it.vbg
It gives me the feeling they are trying to get rid of their shadows. Nice one
even if it
was the wrong
lens.LOL
Dave Brooks
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: PESO New Year's Day Walkaround
It's probably chromatic aberration. It's most evident in this kind
of shot, where the background is extremely bright. I corrected it
somewhat in the RAW conversion, but couldn't eliminate it
Very lovely shots Rob.
Good to see the D can handle stuff like this.
Man i gotta get out more.LOL
Dave
A seasonal occurrence in my locale, captured
tonight:
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/IMGP9481.jpg
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Eyecup for Pentax SF1
Did you get a reply Bill.
I have one here at the house if you still need the measurments.
Yes please Dave.
Thanks
Bill
It's probably chromatic aberration. It's most evident in this kind
of shot, where the background is extremely bright. I corrected it
somewhat in the RAW conversion, but couldn't eliminate it
completely. I think even my A 400/5.6 would show some CA with this
kind of background and minimal
Does not look as misty as it does here today(freezing rain)g
I really like the two pictures that you used the fence as framing. (I like
fences,among
other things lol)
and the first tree/sunset shot. Lovely silloette on the tree.
Do i read correctly as in you have the 1D or is it the iD mkII.
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:07:46 +1000, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Happy New Year to all - we toasted it with a kiss, a Sempe Armagnac and a
Bailey's (respectively!)
I toasted with beer, the proletarian that I am. No bourgeois Champers
or Scotches for this boy! g
It was a premium (so
I get the same effect with my Tokina SD 400mm/5.6, and with my
Tamron 300mm/5.6. These two lenses have proven over time to be
excellent performers on film cameras, but have proven to be less
than stellar on the digital.
I think I'll be keeping at least one film camera for the time being
I just hope it gets to those who need it. Being rather cynical, I rather doubt
it will.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Jens Bladt wrote:
375 million USD is still a lot of money. I just hope teh aid gets there in
time!
Jens
Any Palm users on the list? Can you recommend any Palm (5.2) software for
playing MP3s? Please contact me off list, thanks.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:47:56 +0200, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Yesterday we had rather summer weather - +26C at midday. So here is a
shot for you:
http://www.webaperture.com/gallery/photos/54189
I must be honest, Boris, the photo doesn't really move me. To me, it
is like
Thanks Dave. The lens doesn't show any significant CA under normal
conditions. Out of focus branches against a sky are a worst case
scenario for any lens. I find it's quite good under most circumstances.
Paul
On Jan 2, 2005, at 10:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Decent shot Paul.
Seems the
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:47:56 +0200, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.webaperture.com/gallery/g/si3634
I would very much appreciate opinion of list's street shooters on this
and these :).
I ~really~ like the photos in this album! (except Thou Shalt Not
Pass, of course
I still have PALM OS4.1 so I don't do MP3's much.
But http://www.palmgear.com has *everything*.
Most have free trials too.
Here's some of their MP3 stuff:
http://tinyurl.com/4br43
http://www.handango.com is another good site.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi!
I must be honest, Boris, the photo doesn't really move me.
.. snipped ..
I always feel better saying less than nice things about a photo when I
see that several others like it, because then I think that the photo
may be a good one, and it's just me that doesn't like it. But, as
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:20:35 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For someone who does not like the term 'Street Photoraphy',sure does a good
job of
it.vbg snip
I don't see any streets in the frame. vbg
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
I had the *istD set on center spot autofocus, so I fixed the focus on
the critter, then reframed the shot. I'm not sure that this phenomena
should be described as CA either. Every long lens I've ever used
produces some strange bokeh with extremely out of focus branches
against a bright sky. I
They're under the lake...
frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:20:35 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For someone who does not like the term 'Street Photoraphy',sure does a good job of
it.vbg snip
I don't see any streets in the frame. vbg
-frank
--
I can
Is this an old question?
I'd like to use my LTM lenses on a K1000. Has anyone
done this successfully, or unsuccessfully?
If it's a good idea what's a source for a good LTM to
Pentax Screw Mount adapter?
Thanks,
Jeff
=
Jeffrey Metzger
Independent Sales Agent for AFLAC
Cell: 201 317-1655
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 21:03:41 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We had some decent light today, so I walked down the street to the marsh,
hoping to see some birds. I usually take the A 400/5.6 and a tripod or
monopod on such occasions, but I was feeling lazy, so I mounted the
Thanks Frank. We had a fairly nice day yesterday, but it's raining
today. I plan on watching football as well. Today's my last day to eat
and drink like a pig :-). Tomorrow, it's back to work and a diet plan.
Paul
On Jan 2, 2005, at 11:17 AM, frank theriault wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 21:03:41
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:20:28 +0100, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
375 million USD is still a lot of money. I just hope teh aid gets there in
time!
Yes, you're right, Jens. The numbers seem to be constantly changing
and going up, as the tragedy and it's solutions are being assessed and
Quoting frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Handholding a nearly 500mm (35mm equivalent) lens at 1/250th? Geez,
Paul, you've got pretty steady hands.
Hence the nickname Steady Stenquist.
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:50:50 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Handholding a nearly 500mm (35mm equivalent) lens at 1/250th? Geez,
Paul, you've got pretty steady hands.
Hence the nickname Steady Stenquist.
Indeed!
I'd
Playing with the new toy a bit, I discovered that by pressing the OK
button, the histogram of the view is displayed, and on the image
itself, areas of out of range under exposed turn yellow, while out of
range over exposed turns red.
The front lever can then be used to bias the exposure to give
On 2/1/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
I really like the two pictures that you used the fence as framing. (I
like fences,among
other things lol)
and the first tree/sunset shot. Lovely silloette on the tree.
Thanks Dave. Will contact you off list.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
- Original Message -
From: JP M
Subject: LTM on Pentax Screw Mount
I'd like to use my LTM lenses on a K1000.
A what?
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: Happy New Year
It was a premium (so they call it at the beer store) Sleeman's
Cream
Ale
Poor guy. I had that stuff once.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: PESO New Year's Day Walkaround
A good day to stay inside and watch NFL football.
vbg
I didn't think that was possible.
We've had about a foot of snow over he past few days, and at the
moment it is -30º.
I think I'll go outside and
Hi,
Sunday, January 2, 2005, 4:17:51 PM, JP wrote:
Is this an old question?
I'd like to use my LTM lenses on a K1000. Has anyone
done this successfully, or unsuccessfully?
If it's a good idea what's a source for a good LTM to
Pentax Screw Mount adapter?
There are plenty of M39 (Leica
On 2/1/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sunday, January 2, 2005, 4:17:51 PM, JP wrote:
Is this an old question?
I'd like to use my LTM lenses on a K1000. Has anyone
done this successfully, or unsuccessfully?
If it's a good idea what's a source for a good LTM to
Pentax Screw Mount
Hi Bob,
Yes, I already have the K to M42 adapter on the K1000.
I've been using some Kodak Retina IIIs lenses with a
Deckel to M42 adapter stacked on the K to M42...
I need a pointer to a good one. Meaning an M39 that
has the proper (weird) Leica pitch and that is made of
something other than
William,
I have some Voigtlander/Cosina lenses that are in
Leica Thread Mount. I want to use them on either a
Pentax K1000 or ME Super with the proper adapter/s.
Best,
Jeff
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: JP M
Subject: LTM on Pentax Screw
If the lenses were for Leica or Bessa rangefinders, you won't get much
focus range with them on an SLR. They'll be good for macro and that's
about it. Film plane is in the wrong location.
Paul
On Jan 2, 2005, at 12:32 PM, JP M wrote:
William,
I have some Voigtlander/Cosina lenses that are in
Very clever. Is this a new feature in the industry? This could become a
standard for future digicams!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 2. januar 2005 17:57
Til: Pentax Discuss
This is correct as I've already attempted to use some LTM's on various
Pentax bodies.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 1/2/2005 9:42:48 AM
Subject: Re: LTM on Pentax Screw Mount
If the lenses were for Leica or Bessa
Thank you, Fred. Brightens my day.
Joe
OK, thanks. That's the info I was looking for and
hoping not to get.
The Kodak Retina Lenses are then a strange beast.
They are interchangeable on the Retina iiiS (a
rangefinder) and on the Reflex S (an SLR). I've also
used them succesfully on the K1000.
My HOPE was that I could also use my
I have rediscovered the joys of my Pentax SLR equipment and am new to the
list.
I have a question regarding my Spotmeter V...Are G-13 Mercury batteries
readily available?
Thanks in advance!
Chris
I list the G-13 as a Silver Oxide battery.
If so it can be replaced with the very common SR-44
button battery.
The LR-44 is the Alkaline version and should work but
may not be as accurate over the life of the battery.
HTH
Don
-Original Message-
From: Chris Lindgren [mailto:[EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: JP M
Subject: Re: LTM on Pentax Screw Mount
William,
I have some Voigtlander/Cosina lenses that are in
Leica Thread Mount.
Had I thought about that at all...
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Chris Lindgren
Subject: Spotmeter V
I have rediscovered the joys of my Pentax SLR equipment and am new
to the list.
I have a question regarding my Spotmeter V...Are G-13 Mercury
batteries readily available?
The Spotmeter V will use 3 S76 Silver Oxide
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: Cool Histograms on Optio 750Z
Very clever. Is this a new feature in the industry? This could
become a
standard for future digicams!
I don't think it is possible on DSLRs, at least not the way they are
being made at the moment, but it
I just checked the manual and your right, it specifies
Mercury.
However it says 1.5 volt so a Silver Oxide should work
fine as long as it fits.
If you'll measure the size of one I'll compare ot to an
SR-44 to be sure it's the same size.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Don Sanderson
I just referenced the battery spec from my orig owners manual. I haven't
given it a good looking over, or the meter for that matter, but I seem to
recall...The G-13's operate the meter and the 9V is there for the finder
illumination function. Like I say...I haven't played with it yet and I'm
I had the *istD set on center spot autofocus, so I fixed the focus
on the critter, then reframed the shot.
Good technique.
I don't find it objectionable. In
fact, I find it quite interesting.
Yes quite, great shot all the same. I was considering doing some nature
photography in the New
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: RE: Spotmeter V
I just checked the manual and your right, it specifies
Mercury.
However it says 1.5 volt so a Silver Oxide should work
fine as long as it fits.
If you'll measure the size of one I'll compare ot to an
SR-44 to be sure it's
Okay...I just took a look at the unit. There is no scale illuminator button
on the grip. 3 MS76's are too tall, they're also smaller in diameter than
the orig's. Judging by how they fit in the battery compartment.
Scratch my prior email regarding the functions of the 2 battery sources. It
Thanks. The spotting scope sounds like fun. But you're going to need one heck
of a sturdy tripod. I suppose a gimble head would be in order as well.
Paul
I had the *istD set on center spot autofocus, so I fixed the focus
on the critter, then reframed the shot.
Good technique.
I
I have the very old brown one, and it works fine with silver oxide batteries. I
suspect that it was originally equipped with mercury batteries.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: RE: Spotmeter V
I just checked the manual and your right, it specifies
Mine is a brown body unit with a gray scale index later applied next to the
EV scale. I never used it much in the past. I always used the digital
unit...until I loaned it out and it never came back.
Thanks for the info.
From: quot;William Robbquot; lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
Reply-To:
Mine isn't working with 2 MS76's. I'll do some work on the contacts. If
that doesn't get me anywhere...I'll break out the ohm meter.
Thanks,
Chris
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Spotmeter V
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 19:31:48
I can't help but wonder what the image quality would be like at say 8x10 :)
The scopes optics would have to be very good indeed at that magnification.
John
-- Original Message ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 19:29:02 +
Quoting William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: PESO New Year's Day Walkaround
A good day to stay inside and watch NFL football.
vbg
I didn't think that was possible.
I share your scepticism.
I've never experienced a
Enough of this :-). I obviously have the same unit, so I took a look. One
battery is a PC 640A alkaline. The other is a conventional 9 volt. This is the
very old, dark brown unit without the illuminator button. It works quite well.
Incidentally, that spec battery was installed by Quality
I'm sorry if I have posted this image before
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/2828279/
I entered a local competition with this. The judge didn't like it - at all.
He said the lighting was bad. That's what bothers me: Is it really wrong to
try to just photograph something the way you see it?
Hi gang,
I understand the APS sized sensors on DSLRs converts
your 28mm on a 42mm cropping image area, but if I
understand well, the depth of field remains the one of
a 28mm and also the distortion of image proper of the
original focal lenght remains, since the lens is still
phisycally the same,
On Jan 2, 2005, at 8:48 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
I entered a local competition with this. The judge didn't like it - at
all.
He said the lighting was bad. That's what bothers me: Is it really
wrong to
try to just photograph something the way you see it?
I cannot believe he didn't like the lighting
If you're shooting a portrait with a 50mm lens on your *ist D, your camera
position would be the same as it would be with a 75mm lens on a 35mm film
camera, so the foreshortening would be the same. Thus, a 50 will serve nicely
as a portrait lens on the *istD.
Paul
Hi gang,
I understand
Hi,
Sunday, January 2, 2005, 7:48:50 PM, Jens wrote:
I'm sorry if I have posted this image before
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/2828279/
I entered a local competition with this. The judge didn't like it - at all.
He said the lighting was bad. That's what bothers me: Is it really
If anyone has one they might want to part with at a reasonable price, I
would be interested. Please contact me off list and thanks in advance!
That's probably the F 70-210/4-5.6, though... ;-)
Fred
Hmmm
Long story (the optical/scientific side) - I won't go into that.
Still, the DOF remains unchanged. DOF is a function of Aperture and Focal
length an focusing distance - nothing else. However, since you normally use
shorter focal lengths for a smaller (digital) format (to get the sam
Thanks very much, Jon - and Bob.
I agree - about the judge.
He was a complete printing fettishist - he obviously didn't care what was
in the photograph - as long as it was very well printed! I agree, that well
printed (and of cource) exposed, photgraphs can look pretty convincing. Like
this one:
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The judge is obviously an idiot.
That's *just* what I was thinking.
Cory
liked it a lot.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.7 - Release Date: 12/30/2004
I see nothing wrong with the lighting at all... the judge is simply
wrong. It happens!
Good catch!
keith whaley
Jens Bladt wrote:
I'm sorry if I have posted this image before
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/2828279/
I entered a local competition with this. The judge didn't like it - at
On Jan 2, 2005, at 11:56 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Wow - not even a tremor?
Yup...not a single vibe. We didn't know anything about it until we
heard it on the news. Relatives in Bangkok did feel the building sway a
bit and some of the towers were evacuated as a precaution.
(snip)
Ann replies:
Thanks Fred! It's always encouraging being validated.. very much appreciated.
Cheers,
Ryan
-- Original Message --
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 22:31:33 -0500 (EST)
From: Fred Widall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PUG Favourites for 2004
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
På 2. jan. 2005 kl. 17.38 skrev frank theriault:
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:20:28 +0100, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
375 million USD is still a lot of money. I just hope teh aid gets
there in
time!
Yes, you're right, Jens. The numbers seem to be constantly changing
and going up, as the
Short answer, no. It may be possible to use 1.5 volt cells in the
spotmeter without modification. You can
do that with Pentax Cameras from the SP F onward for certain, maybe
earlier models as well. Someone else
may know if the Spotmeters work that way as well. If not you can get
Wein cells
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3002800size=lg
Just a quick one before my 2 minutes at the Inet cafe runs out.. Paris on
NY Eve 2004! There's a story to come but must log off..
Cheers,
Ryan
Assuming that you're scanning at the same bit depth and with all other
parameters the same, would there be any loss of detail or information or
whatever when scanning at 2000ppi v 4000ppi?
Shel
Fred Widall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apr - Curved - Galleria Umberto I by Gianfranco Irlanda,
Italy
and
Sep - Mystery - Ready for the Ceremonial by Gianfranco
Irlanda, Italy
Hi Fred,
Thanks for mentioning me twice! It's a nice way to begin a year!
:-D
Also thanks for making me want to have
Still, the DOF remains unchanged. DOF is a function of Aperture and
Focal length an focusing distance - nothing else. However, since you
normally use shorter focal lengths for a smaller (digital) format (to
get the sam AOV), the DOF seemingly gets better (deeper) for the smaller
(digital)
Contact:
Quality Light-Metric
7060 Hollywood Boulevard; Suite 415
Los Angeles, California 90028
323-467-2265
They'll give you the most reliable information on which batteries can be
used, although it's probably a good idea to get the meter calibrated
considering its age and that you may be
Albano Garcia mused:
Hi gang,
I understand the APS sized sensors on DSLRs converts
your 28mm on a 42mm cropping image area, but if I
understand well, the depth of field remains the one of
a 28mm and also the distortion of image proper of the
original focal lenght remains, since the lens
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:59:31 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: Happy New Year
It
Poor guy. I had that stuff once.
Hey, it was in the fridge and it was free (to me, at least). Those
are two of the things I
Hi,
Sunday, January 2, 2005, 8:36:23 PM, Jens wrote:
Thanks very much, Jon - and Bob.
I agree - about the judge.
He was a complete printing fettishist - he obviously didn't care what was
in the photograph - as long as it was very well printed! I agree, that well
printed (and of cource)
Shel Belinkoff mused:
Assuming that you're scanning at the same bit depth and with all other
parameters the same, would there be any loss of detail or information or
whatever when scanning at 2000ppi v 4000ppi?
Absolutely. Scanning at 4000ppi will resolve some fine detail
which would be
You should get more detail at 4000ppi than you get at 2000ppi. You're recording
more information, so the results are better. I can see the difference between a
6x7 neg scanned at 1600 as opposed to one scanned at 3200.
Paul
Assuming that you're scanning at the same bit depth and with all
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:04:31 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3002800size=lg
Just a quick one before my 2 minutes at the Inet cafe runs out.. Paris on
NY Eve 2004! There's a story to come but must log off..
Cheers,
Ryan
Nice
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
