Nice one Frank.
I like the way the buildings fade in to the murky weather, really adds
a sense of depth the fact that the street is so empty, save this on
hearty soul. I also like the way she's struggling to keep her hood
down.
One tiny little thing. About an inch from the top, just right of
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 10:59:22 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to break a lot of rules, but I have to say there's something
compelling about it none-the-less.
Agreed. My first reaction was Why is she in the middle? Wouldn't
this be a bit better if she were a little to the
What's really sad is that there are 2 available now
at BIN prices less than $100.00!!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 11:46 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The Pentax Glass Phenomenon Continues!
Yes, but you can't account for e-bay.
Don Sanderson wrote:
What's really sad is that there are 2 available now
at BIN prices less than $100.00!!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 11:46 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Aww isn't that cute? g
I always find cat's eyes somewhat hypnotising. The little fur ball
looks about ready to pounce.
Every time I see a cute cat photo I have two thoughts.
1. Aww isn't that cute?
2. School science experiment on static electricity.
I won't elaborate on 2. Might
Hi,
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3879053120
Holy Hoppin Horny Toads!
Don
Must have been born yesterday.
--
Cheers,
Bob
I was just giveng my lates arrival, the SMC-M 4/200mm a test drive:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/6008407/
Regards
Jens
... It works fine from my PC??
Wait a while. Some times comfirmation take a few minutes.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. marts 2005 18:25
Til: Jens Bladt
Hi,
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3173937size=lg
We always encourage comments, and thank you in advance should you
choose to do so.
Very good!
--
Cheers,
Bob
Congratulations! Hope you're out dancing soon.
Paul
On Mar 6, 2005, at 11:33 AM, Bill Owens wrote:
Just returned home from 4 days in the hospital. Still sore around the
colostomy, but the PIA from the ulcer is gone.
Bill
Oh yes!
I was just about to ask you to clean your monitor screen when I spotted it.
Just above that pole that holds the Don't DO This signs...
Yes, it is a tiny thing, and only visible when you know it's there, and
an artifact.
The sort of thing that now I know it's there, I can never look at
It's not a blizzard as
the average windspeed was only 40 km/h (about 25 mph), although gusts
were much higher. Environment Canada's definition of a blizzard is
snow with average winds of over 50 km/h (30mph).
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3173937size=lg
Makes me shiver looking at
True - except for the cabinet part :-)
Well my F is in the bag. But zooms are not for panoramas IMO. So, I use my M
and K lenses frequently!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6.
Funny... [...meaning odd.]
When I mouse-click on the photos, hoping to enlarge them, I get closeup
views of a brick wall taken with an SMC-M 35mm 1:2.8 lens @ f/2.8...
keith whaley
Jens Bladt wrote:
I took a few test shots today.
To see how the SMC-M 4/200mm is doing.
Not so bad - compared to
In an amendment to the current Copenhagen Region Plan used 4 of my
panoramas, including the front page (part of a panorama), was published:
http://www.hur.dk/545A23A1-13D2-4C0D-8658-687F449BDBC3
be patient; 3.9MB
Lok at:
The front page,
Page 8-9, 10-11, 12-14, 15-16.
All, but one, done with
Don't click on the photograph. This will give you the next one.
Click on Full Size - buttom of the page.
Regards
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. marts 2005 19:18
Til:
Excellent shot. Nice composition. Very dramatic. Bravo!
Paul
On Mar 6, 2005, at 1:14 PM, Powell Hargrave wrote:
It's not a blizzard as
the average windspeed was only 40 km/h (about 25 mph), although gusts
were much higher. Environment Canada's definition of a blizzard is
snow with average winds
The outer diameter seems to be about 55mm, the inner diameter is around
53/54mm. The filter that was in the hood is a Ednalite Duraklad coated
skylight. I put some pics of the lens on the web:
http://home.comcast.net/~gutenberg14/IMGP0800.jpg
http://home.comcast.net/%7Egutenberg14/IMGP0801.jpg
Holy cow - this must be a collectors item. Someone's building a mint Pentax
collection!
It doubt people who spends this kind of money take pictures!
I have the A-version. Very nice lens :-) I guess I paid 150 USD for that.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Hello frank,
Nice job! You really portrayed the feeling of the storm. I like the
framing of the women in the lower right. Impressive.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, March 6, 2005, 7:51:34 AM, you wrote:
ft I was going to save this for later in the week, and make it a PAW, but
ft we're
I'd have loved to be there, in part because that area is my home.
Thanks for the report, Shel.
Joe
Hello Bill,
Glad that you are home. Hope all is well. My wife had an ileostomy
done about 20 years ago. I can say that she has been far happier
since. Hope that your life picks up post op.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, March 6, 2005, 8:33:41 AM, you wrote:
BO Just returned home from 4
My mistake. The auction was at $38. Then someone bid $391, apparently by
accident. That was followed by a $396 bid. That last bid was probably
from a bidder who set his final bid ridiculously high, just to make sure
he won in a snipe out. However, he wasn't counting on someone bidding
very
That looks like a standard super tak 55mm with an ugly aluminum stepup
ring screwed into it's filter ring. Are you sure that's part of the lens?
glenn murphy wrote:
The outer diameter seems to be about 55mm, the inner diameter is
around 53/54mm. The filter that was in the hood is a Ednalite
A number of people suggested that I revisit this site and give it
another go so before I get to the better
pictures I thought I'd post this one. Complete with annoying color
fringing and obnoxious fisheye effect.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_untitled3.html
As usual comments are
It would have been great to meet you, Joe ... we talked about doing this
again some time soon, so maybe next time. It really was fun. I hope the
report -0 if one can call it that - captures the light-hearted camaraderie
that took place.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Joseph Tainter
I'd
Hi,
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3173937size=lg
We always encourage comments, and thank you in advance should you
choose to do so.
One more comment - not a criticism, because I like the picture, but
something I try to look out for when I take photos. The big 'For
Lease' sign.
Agreed. Try unscrewing the chrome ring, Glenn
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Peter J. Alling
That looks like a standard super tak 55mm with an ugly aluminum stepup
ring screwed into it's filter ring. Are you sure that's part of the lens?
I'm not sure anymore. At one point yesterday I tried to see if it came
off and ended up removing the whole front of the lens. I'll take another
look. Thanks.
Glenn
Peter J. Alling wrote:
That looks like a standard super tak 55mm with an ugly aluminum stepup
ring screwed into it's filter ring.
That was it. I took it apart again, and with a lot of effort and the
help of a rubber grip, the ugly stepup ring has been removed. Yes, it
has a 49mm filter ring just like any other 1:1.8/55. Thanks to everybody
for your help. Sorry for the confusion.
Glenn
Peter J. Alling wrote:
That looks
Hello Jens,
Rather like this one. The street lamps all in a row and the shadow
running across the street are what make it for me. Without the title,
I wouldn't know what the kids are doing, but I don't think it matters
too much. They are doing something with the snow. Nice shot.
--
Best
Ah, sanity prevails:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3878089988
Still not a bad price for a mediocre lens.
Perhaps I'd better list a few more.
Don
Good work Joe. I would love to see the M or A 15mm thrown into the mix...
Vic
If someone wants to send me one I'd be happy to test it.
Joe
The only question I have is, can you tell us there was no focus error
for the tests you conducted? Did you rely on AF, MF, or MF with
magnifier? Just curious. If DA14 didn't perform that well, I wonder how
it compared to K/A15/3.5.
Alan, I used autofocus, except for the Zenitar, of
Indeed, 250 km east...
Andre
Swing about 400 miles west...
Geez, you know, now that I think of it, ~is~ there anyone from
Montreal on the list, now that Caveman is on hiatus? I think Andre's
in Quebec City. Can't think of anyone other than Val in Montreal.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
Thanks for the encouragement, Bruce. According to my radiation oncologist
this will hopefully be a temporary procedure while the rectal ulcer heals.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 1:47 PM
Jens Bladt wrote:
Don't click on the photograph. This will give you the next one.
Click on Full Size - buttom of the page.
Regards
Jens Bladt
Okay!
On my screen, the bottom of your page was about a cm off the screen, so
I didn't see any of those little buttons.
Once I scrolled up a little, there
Hi!
Just returned home from 4 days in the hospital. Still sore around the
colostomy, but the PIA from the ulcer is gone.
Bill
Great. Wishing you speedy and complete recovery!
Boris
Hi!
What is known about the subject? How it compares to modern AF version?
With similar Pentax glass?
Thanks in advance.
Boris
Apparently not as good as the EX version according to tests.
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:43:47 +0200
Subject: Sigma 50/2.8 macro MF, opinions sought
Hi!
What is known about the
I took a few test shots today.
To see how the SMC-M 4/200mm is doing.
Not so bad - compared to the SMC F 4-5.6/70-210mm.
I think the prime is the sharper lens of the two.
I came to the same conclusion some time back with several lenses tested.
Using a tripod, refconverter A @ 2x, manual
What a story! It ought to be published in Auctions for Dummies (if there
is such a magazine or web site anywhere)!
The lesson being: Don't bid more than you are prepared to pay!
I guess we have all atleast thought of doing this from time to time!?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Owens wrote:
Just returned home from 4 days in the hospital. Still sore around the
colostomy, but the PIA from the ulcer is gone.
Bill
Good to have you back, Bill.
m
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
infiltraitor
Love it!
m
Great report Shel, thanks for that. I would have loved to attend, but
alas, I had to work yesterday.
Next time.
j
--
Juan Buhler
http://www.jbuhler.com
blog at http://www.jbuhler.com/blog
Graywolf wrote:
It must be the new *istDS owners. That lens only cost about $125 new, and
hasn't
a great reputation (the 3.5 was better). I guess these insane new prices
mean I
will never own that M20/4.0 I have always wanted. You guys who stocked up
on
older Pentax lenses when they were cheap
On 6/3/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
I was going to save this for later in the week, and make it a PAW, but
we're supposed to get a couple more inches of snow today (but it might
turn to rain later in the afternoon - yuck!), so today seemed an
appropriate day to post this.
Good to see your smiling pixels back on the list, Bill ;-))
Shel
On Mar 6, 2005, at 11:33 AM, Bill Owens wrote:
Just returned home from 4 days in the hospital. Still sore around the
colostomy, but the PIA from the ulcer is gone.
Bill
Some times PhotoShop's File Browser will make PEF thumbnails and display
EXIF info and sometimes not. I can't figure why or how to make it develop
thumbnails when they do not appear.
As I process the files with no thumbnails they do appear in File Browser,
but it is a pain not being able to
Congratulation with the K 200mm, John! Quite a bargain! Is it better than
the M - or just harder to find?
Thanks for posting your results. They make me happy :-)).
I always wanted a 200mm, when I shot film (Got a 135mm and a 300mm - (K and
M*).
I'd like to have the FA 2.8/200mm, which is
Apparently not as good as the EX version according to tests.
John
Did some research before I got the EX version. The older one is not too
good rating average or less. Most macros, even older ones usually rate at
least good.
Powell
-- Original Message ---
From: Boris
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you use DOF-preview and program mode or Tv, the PZs don't work. The
-5n was the first one
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Graywolf wrote:
will never own that M20/4.0 I have always wanted. You guys who stocked up on
older Pentax lenses when they were cheap are going to be rich, Don.
Err, only if he decides to sell :-)
Kostas
Congratulation with the K 200mm, John! Quite a bargain! Is it better
than the M - or just harder to find? Thanks for posting your
results.
Thanks Jens, I'm not sure which is the best optically but it'll be
interesting to test both some time, perhaps post some results. I never
scanned the
Hi,
Sunday, March 6, 2005, 7:59:57 PM, Jens wrote:
What a story! It ought to be published in Auctions for Dummies (if there
is such a magazine or web site anywhere)!
http://tinyurl.com/5bkdq
--
Cheers,
Bob
... or are prices soaring on Pentax primes right now?
GT $200 for the F50/1.4 on eekbay today.
Not even the FA version.
Sheesh.
Mediocre lenses, high prices.
My personal favorite 50mm + extras, chp!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3878130375
Wierd!
Don
FA primes seem to be well sought after these days, even the 28mm f/2.8
fetches a very good price.
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Collin R Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:30:07 -0500
Subject: Am I mistaken ...
... or are
You've been witnessing the Pentax Glass Phenomenon!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Collin R Brendemuehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 3:30 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Am I mistaken ...
... or are prices soaring on Pentax primes right now?
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: PESO: This Is Not a Blizzard
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3173937size=lg
We always encourage comments, and thank you in advance should you
choose to do so.
Has kind of a Steiglitz feel to it, doesn't it?
William Robb
I use the same combination a lot and have never noticed this. Was it very
cold, or your batteries well used?
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 6:48 PM
Subject: PZ 28-105 and istD question
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 01:41:44 +0800, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice one Frank.
I like the way the buildings fade in to the murky weather, really adds
a sense of depth the fact that the street is so empty, save this on
hearty soul. I also like the way she's struggling to keep her
On 6/3/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
One tiny little thing. About an inch from the top, just right of
centre, there's a black speck that keeps grabbing my attention, it's
gotta go :-)
Oh My God! A tiny thing? A TINY THING?
No, David, I want to apologize humbly, deeply
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:01:11 +, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more comment - not a criticism, because I like the picture, but
something I try to look out for when I take photos. The big 'For
Lease' sign. It's probably the whitest thing in the frame, and so it
tends to pull the eye
On 6/3/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sigh...
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3175020size=lg
There. Satisfied?
LOL!!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
All opinions much appreciated.
I currently have an unhealthy interest in enabling myself with an FA 35mm
f/2, however I have a Tamron 28-75 XR Di f/2.8 which appears to perform very
well.
Do you think I should be content with the Tamron or pursue the FA 35mm?
Does anyone have both that
On 6/3/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sigh...
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3175020size=lg
There. Satisfied?
Hey buddy while you're at it, I hate the number 195 - any chance you
could maybe make it 159? And what about that no parking sign, how about
swapping
I have two Photo CDs from the local camera shop here
(the fruits of my shooting the Music Man production at
my son's high school).
The CD contains a folder labelled Preview (which
contains small jpgs), one called Pictures (which
contains large jpgs), and one called DCIM. This also
seems to
I have two Photo CDs from the local camera shop here
(the fruits of my shooting the Music Man production at
my son's high school).
The CD contains a folder labelled Preview (which
contains small jpgs), one called Pictures (which
contains large jpgs), and one called DCIM. This also
seems to
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:01:11 +, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more comment - not a criticism, because I like the picture, but
something I try to look out for when I take photos. The big 'For
Lease' sign. It's probably the whitest thing in the frame, and so it
tends to pull the eye
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 17:31:36 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:01:11 +, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
2) That photo, wonderful and full of impact as it is, is not what it
appears. It's actually a relief line for flood victims in, IIRC,
Missouri or
it's not a coincidence that you and i ended up with the same monitor.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: LCD monitors?
I recently had to replace my monitor and had the option of
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 22:16:01 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I rather liked it. Can I have copy of just the speck?
Go away, Cotty!
LOL
cheers,
frank
ps: I was actually tempted for a brief second to blow up that speck
REAL big and post it. But I didn't. g
--
Sharpness is a
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 22:24:58 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey buddy while you're at it, I hate the number 195 - any chance you
could maybe make it 159? And what about that no parking sign, how about
swapping them around, maybe try twisting the top one around a bit to
match the
On 6/3/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
I believe I've already told you...
Now Frank, you *know* I don't take no for an answer.
Free The Speck, Free The Speck, Free The Speck.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:48:14 -0500, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm about to buy a ticket to Montreal. I have stuff to do on the weekend
but I'll be getting in on the 25th with nothing planned until the rest of my
party arrives late that night.
Any PDML crew up there?
CW
Geez,
I just
I believe Popular Photography tested the FA 35 several years ago -- so
along ago that it is not one of the tests posted on their web site. As I
recall, and going on others' experiences with the lens, it is a bit soft
at f2 but spectacular thereafter -- nearly (but not quite) as good as
the FA
Hi,
Sunday, March 6, 2005, 10:17:00 PM, frank wrote:
So I do my best to choose a vantage point that avoids intrusive text
because I know that if the text gets in the frame, people will read it
rather than look at the real subject.
Sigh...
The for dummies books teach techniques, not common sense.
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Sunday, March 6, 2005, 7:59:57 PM, Jens wrote:
What a story! It ought to be published in Auctions for Dummies (if there
is such a magazine or web site anywhere)!
http://tinyurl.com/5bkdq
--
I can understand why
Okay, not really high culture; maybe not culture at all.
Went to a local gallery to see an exhibit of 15 Garry Winogrand photos.
It was pretty cool.
I like it when people tilt, when there's all sorts of crap peeking
into the edges of frames (like arms, feet and parts of heads and
bodies). I
My daughter Ingrid in the studio.
I've been trying to get her to sit for me for a long time. Today, she needed a
passport photo, so I talked her into a couple extra shots. She's a junior at
Michigan State, and will be studying in France this summer.
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 09:37:26 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip Nice try, Bruce. I just ordered
a Leica M4 pffft! to digital LOL
Excellent!! An M4! Tell me all about it! (off list, if necessary).
Over dinner we mostly discussed other list members, and had especially
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 23:26:53 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My daughter Ingrid in the studio.
I've been trying to get her to sit for me for a long time. Today, she needed
a passport photo, so I talked her into a couple extra shots. She's a junior
at Michigan State, and
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 18:58:38 +0100, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just giveng my lates arrival, the SMC-M 4/200mm a test drive:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/6008407/
Regards
Jens
A joyful shot! I love it.
I like the whiff of snow dust just above the kid's arm who just
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 14:04:12 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A number of people suggested that I revisit this site and give it
another go so before I get to the better
pictures I thought I'd post this one. Complete with annoying color
fringing and obnoxious fisheye effect.
My heartfelt thanks to all of you for our concern, encouragement and prayers
during my recent hospitalization. The PDML is more and more like a family.
Thanks again,
Bill
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 22:08:37 -0800, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
My Pentax family:
http://www.newpixel.net/special/pentax_family.jpg
Sorry it's such a lousy picture. snip
It's hard to take good photos when you're overcome by emotion (new
family addition and all...) g
That's a nice
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:22:11 +0100, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In an amendment to the current Copenhagen Region Plan used 4 of my
panoramas, including the front page (part of a panorama), was published:
http://www.hur.dk/545A23A1-13D2-4C0D-8658-687F449BDBC3
be patient; 3.9MB
Lok at:
Thanks Frank. She's going to spend the summer in Nimes, a medium sized city in
Provence, about 10 miles north of the Mediterranean. (There should be a
diacritical mark abouve the i in Nimes, but I'm too lazy to try and find it
on the keyboard. :-). She's an English Lit major with a minor in
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 15:23:55 +0100, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, the same with the K1000!
...and Spotties, too!
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 13:37:46 -0500, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The MX arrived today. Everything works and it looks good inside and
out. Man, is this thing small.
Nice one, Scott!!
They are small. Like little jewels, they are.
You may want to look for a Winder MX on eBay. I
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer
Subject: Dumb Photo CD question
I have two Photo CDs from the local camera shop here
(the fruits of my shooting the Music Man production at
my son's high school).
The CD contains a folder labelled Preview (which
contains small jpgs), one called
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 23:58:21 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip I think it will be a good experience, snip
Let's just hope she doesn't come back with a broken heart. You know
those dashing young Frenchmen! LOL
Seriously, sounds like a great way to learn the language and
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:03:01 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may want to look for a Winder MX on eBay. I have one, and it
makes a great grip (I almost never use the motor drive, although it
~does~ sound wicked g). One sometimes sees them on eBay not in
working order for
Last pack of Memorex Cool Colors CD-R purchased
containes discs with no grooves. No radiating
reflections I normally see.
I've only burned one disc which reproduced a normal
image.
Something new?
Jack
__
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:03:01 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now you need a pancake...
cheers,
frank
I dunno. I've heard it's awfully hard to get a grip on, due to its
pancakeness. I've alway liked 35mm lenses. Ever try to search for a
35mm lens on ebay? Yowser!
Anybody
Scott Loveless wrote:
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:03:01 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may want to look for a Winder MX on eBay. I have one, and it
makes a great grip (I almost never use the motor drive, although it
~does~ sound wicked g). One sometimes sees them on eBay not in
The scene reminded me of the scenes we see on TV every day from a
different part of the world. Except there's snow, no sand. Too bad
all the rest of world's not this happy.
Good shot. Made me smile.
--
Scott Loveless
Born free. Taxed to death.
Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the encouragement, Bruce. According to my radiation oncologist
this will hopefully be a temporary procedure while the rectal ulcer heals.
BTW everyone: I just got off the phone with Bill and he sounds as if
he's doing very well. And in case anyone
I'll put you in touch with the owner of the Ethiopian restaurant where we
had lunch. If I were you I wouldn't believe a word from anyone at the
meeting, especially me.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: frank theriault
Yes, my ears were burning yesterday. vbg I want a full report,
from
101 - 200 of 271 matches
Mail list logo
