On Aug 25, 2005, at 10:24 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I don't think we're really disagreeing, just describing the same
thing a
little differently.
lol ... Perhaps. :-)
I think in terms of digital process almost exclusively nowadays. The
expression colors and tonalities are converted
I'm really not one to tread the upgrade path frequently, or take that path
without careful thought. FWIW, I still use Win 95 and Lotus 123 v2.01 (a
program I purchased in 1988 or 1989) on my old computer - works just fine
for my needs ;-)) Thanks, John
Shel
[Original Message]
From:
My understanding is that the DA40 Ltd covers 24x36mm format very well
despite it's DA designation. However, it does not have an aperture
ring so it would be unsatisfactory on, say, the MX body since it
would only operate at f/22 or some such without body control of the
aperture mechanism.
Hmmm that may make it unsatisfactory on the DS as well.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
... however, it does not have an aperture
ring so it would be unsatisfactory on, say, the MX body since it
would only operate at f/22 or some such without body control of the
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis Subject: The Nature of Film's Final Throws
How much longer will starving film cameras demand 35mm
color pos/neg films be produced? What level of
production and availability would qualify as in
production?
What's the likelihood of film's
I concur on the 820 - I threw one in the trash too! My HP 7960 is
so much better. My experience with Epson printers is that the
expensive ones are great and the cheap ones are crap. Kind of sounds
like Canon lenses grin.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, August 25, 2005, 4:59:01 PM, you
Huh? Full control of both body and lens will be possible, and you'll
be able to use all the DS' capabilities. Why would that be
unsatisfactory??
Godfrey
On Aug 25, 2005, at 11:14 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hmmm that may make it unsatisfactory on the DS as well.
... however, it does
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Pancakes for Breakfast
Hmmm that may make it unsatisfactory on the DS as well.
These cameras are designed to have the aperture set from the body.
It did take some getting used to, but it is a technique not difficult to
How would one set the aperture when using the lens manually, like in
aperture priority, or when using full manual modes? Am I missing something?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Huh? Full control of both body and lens will be possible, and you'll
be able to use all the
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Pancakes for Breakfast
Oh, I didn't know that. Don't recall ever hearing of such a thing. That
might be kinda neat ... or not. Worth trying, anyway.
I would still prefer using an aperture ring, but since they are taking that
One of the things I'm inspecting carefully is colour depth. I've got a
slide of a red geranium (on Velvia) that I cannot get a decent scan of
with the Craposcan. It looks indescribably dull and if I try to boost the
saturation, the image just goes a sort of wierd fluorescent hue before it
Oh, I didn't know that. Don't recall ever hearing of such a thing. That
might be kinda neat ... or not. Worth trying, anyway.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Pancakes for Breakfast
Hmmm that may make it
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/08/26 Fri AM 01:06:22 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Film scanner question
the real test is scanning greens. the eye is most sensitive in that color
area.
Herb...
Care to elucidate?
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/08/26 Fri AM 01:16:58 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Wideangle enablement :)
however, the A* lenses with rear filter mounts don't require a filter in the
filter mount at all times.
Herb...
Even more interesting.
From: Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/08/26 Fri AM 01:27:55 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Film scanner question
I think you run a MAC. PS uses all the memory on MAC'., With PC's it will
only use up to 2 gigabytes. PS2 is nice.
graywolf
From: Cesar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/08/26 Fri AM 02:21:46 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Survey: Your Most Unusual Shot
mike wilson wrote:
From: Cesar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1) I was sitting in a UH-1 with the doors open as we did a 'map of the
earth'
In M mode the ring controls shutter time, pressing the Av button
tranfers control to the aperture. A little awkward, but you learn =)
On the istD, the front ring controls the shutter time, the rear one
controls
the aperture value. I haven't handled a Ds, apparently it only has one
control
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:25:16PM +0100, Chris Stoddart wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, mike wilson wrote:
Empiricism seems to be the only saviour here. Time to get 'em out! 8-)
Yay, that's what we need - some tests! If everyone who's willing and owns
a Mir-47K 20mm f/2.5 can take a picture
Probably the same way my Z-20 (PZ-20) does. You'd press the Tv/Av
button to change what the wheel controlled (ie. shutter speed or
aperture).
Dave
On 8/26/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Pancakes for Breakfast
Taken at night.. forgot to switch off the noise reduction from my D :(
I know utilities can do that but dunno which ones.
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
From: John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/08/26 Fri AM 07:28:42 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Film scanner question
One of the things I'm inspecting carefully is colour depth. I've got a
slide of a red geranium (on Velvia) that I cannot get a decent scan
Yes, the DS works like a z-20 (and derivates) and the D works like a Z-1.
Pretty much the same. If you own a Z1 and use both wheels, it is very
straightforward.
2005/8/26, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Probably the same way my Z-20 (PZ-20) does. You'd press the Tv/Av
button to change what
Superb example of BW conversion. (I like the shot very much as well.)
But on my monitor, the highlights and shadows are detailed and right at
the ends of the spectrum, the midtones are nicely separated and
beautifully rendered. Excellent. Would love to see it printed on Epson
Velvet Fine Art
I'm reposting this one. For some reason I did get the subject line wrong the
first time:
I had a walk in the Vigeland Park when I was in Oslo. Those of you who has
been in Norway know it, for the rest of you: It is a large sculpture park
in
Oslo, with 192 sculptures by Gustav Vigeland, a very
This poetic post sets me in a very nostalgic mood. Those where the days,
(I'm not at all ironic here).
At the same time, I can't help wondering if my sons will be saying similar
things about the media of today: Digital photo. ;-)
Something like A kid born in 2028 (when I turn 40) won't ever edit
I've managed to acquire a 60GB iPod Photo, and am rediscovering my CD
collection. Wonderous indeed. Now need to do some enablement.
I know the pod won't display RAW files, but that's ok. I just want to
dump RAWs. I'm looking at the Belkin media reader. Seems it will work
nicely at firewire
No I've been trying CS2. There is no way in hell I could afford to by it.
Funny thing is it runs nicely on my now ancient 900mhz/512mb AMD Homebrew
computer. I keep seeing people say it is slow on their modern super computers.
Maybe it is just that I normally only have one or two aps open at
Bob W wrote:
I've had plenty of those situations when I did have a camera with me, but
other things stopped me getting the shot.
Driving is a big one -- of those things that stops one getting the shot.
Thank you Boris. Thank you Godfrey :-)
Anyone out there who knows a patch without these limitations?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original
From what I read in reviews written by long term users the expensive Epsons clog up too, only difference it that it is cheaper to replace the print head than to trash it and buy something else. Also Epson inks never turn out to have the permanence the are claimed to but it takes two three years
On Thursday, August 25, 2005, at 09:56 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
you have to manually set white balance to something fixed, like
daylight or something.
Have a look: www.warmcards.com I've used these for several years.
Bob
Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I concur on the 820 - I threw one in the trash too! My HP 7960 is
so much better. My experience with Epson printers is that the
expensive ones are great and the cheap ones are crap. Kind of sounds
like Canon lenses grin.
Ah, but keep in mind that cheap
A nice picture. Despite being a bit unsharp.
But what grab my attention are the threes, I like them, but I don't tend to
look at the main subject.
Could be me and my biases, being a Me don't love wheels man.
I try to ignore him, because he is disturbing my peace, roaring around ;-)
Tim
Mostly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26. august 2005 07:10
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: CR-V3 rechargeables
In a message dated 8/25/2005 2:18:57 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 25/8/05, Boris Liberman,
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 25, 2005, at 6:38 PM, keithw wrote:
[...]
I mean, really! 1956! Sports car nirvana age...
My first sports car was a Triumph TR-3!
Lots of memories from back then. I was totally immersed in SCCA
activities, crewing and racing and driving my TR around the
On Thursday, August 25, 2005, at 08:00 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050825/ap_on_bi_ge/kodak_consolidation
I've been reading this thread from the start and keep wondering where
we're talking about throwing film.
Pardon me for correcting the thread title. It's
On Friday, August 26, 2005, at 08:21 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ah, but keep in mind that cheap Canon lenses are really Tamrons!
Sez who?
Bob
Last Tuesday my brother got married (hooray !!)
I've been visiting 2 barber shops that day and off course the camera was
with me :)
so here is a small gallery with the best shots of that film (Trix 400
pushed to 800)
http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/WeddingPreps
PS: why did i push that 400ASA
Shel.
I have Scottish blood in my veins, have you? ;-)
Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of not throwing away functioning things.
I just couldn't resist.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C.
Throws???
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, those were cars you drove, not aimed.
When you moved the steering wheel, you were hooked directly to the road,
and you knew it! Same with every other function. Direct hookup. Exciting
driving!
You didn't need speed to get a sensation of driving.
I used to
Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken at night.. forgot to switch off the noise reduction from my D :(
I know utilities can do that but dunno which ones.
RawShooter Essentials has some noise reduction capability.
http://www.pixmantec.com/products/rawshooter_essentials.html
After converting
Ella Fitzgerald in concert from behind!
I heard her at that tour (from front, in Oslo). She was a diamond, despite a
stiff upper lip audience.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some
Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2005, at 08:21 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ah, but keep in mind that cheap Canon lenses are really Tamrons!
Sez who?
Informed sources whose jobs would be in danger if they were named. But
also anyone who's worked in a camera shop and had
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its hard to tell if this thread has run down yet. Maybe not. If you still
want to, feel free to continue to add your reply/answer.
However, I wanted to throw my thanks in now.
Thanks for starting the thread Marnie! Because of it, I've been going
through my old shots
Me think, cheap Canon lenses are really _cheap_ Tamrons!
But who am I to say?
I'm using a Tamron 28-75/2,8 and _want_ to believe its a proper lens.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/08/26 Fri PM 12:16:15 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The Nature of Film's Final Throes
On Thursday, August 25, 2005, at 08:00 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050825/ap_on_bi_ge/kodak_consolidation
Yeah, as in death throws.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Throws???
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, as in death throws.
Sorry, I was being pedantic. It's death throes.
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Throws???
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Some cheesy song remakes:
Inna-Gouda-Vel-Veeta
Let it Brie
Ricotta Get Out of This Place
Cheeses Christ Superstar
Your Cheesing Heart
Bleu (cheese) Suede Shoes
Nacho Man
Muenster Mash
--
Daniel J. Matyola
Stanley, Powers Matyola
78 Grove Street
Somerville, NJ 08876
(908)725-3322 (tel)
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Posted another yesterday, have been productive. Post titled PESO:Late
summer
Reflections. No comments so far. It deserves better IMHO.
If you don't feel like finding the origenal
mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the real test is scanning greens. the eye is most sensitive in that color
area.
Care to elucidate?
1: The green channel of a digital image very closely corresponds to the
overall luminance of the image.
2: The human
Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me think, cheap Canon lenses are really _cheap_ Tamrons!
But who am I to say?
I'm using a Tamron 28-75/2,8 and _want_ to believe its a proper lens.
Sorry, but Canon makes their own f/2.8 zooms!
It's things like the 70-300 f/4.0-5.6 and $80.00 28-80 zooms
On Friday, August 26, 2005, at 08:49 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Informed sources whose jobs would be in danger if they were named. But
also anyone who's worked in a camera shop and had the opportunity to
hold the Tamron and Canon version of the same lens at the same time
will
tell you it's
Er..that is, throes.
Thanks,
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Throws???
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2005, at 08:49 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Informed sources whose jobs would be in danger if they were named. But
also anyone who's worked in a camera shop and had the opportunity to
hold the Tamron and Canon version of the same lens at
Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some cheesy song remakes:
Inna-Gouda-Vel-Veeta
Let it Brie
Getting Feta All the Time?
Ricotta Get Out of This Place
Cheeses Christ Superstar
Drop Kick Me Cheeses Through the Goal Posts of Life?
Your Cheesing Heart
Bleu (cheese) Suede Shoes
Nacho
Subtle. I like that. I'll change my mail signature to
Tim. Mostly subtle, on second thoughts, I wont.
There is a link at the page gråskala, it makes a rather primitive BW
conversion. When clicking it the man almost becomes an integrated part of
the statue. That I love!
Thats the idea I had in
Pretty much my feeling, also.
Lack of commercial support facilities will likely
hasten the end.
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis Subject: The Nature of Film's
Final Throws
How much longer will starving film cameras demand
There's a function button.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Pancakes for Breakfast
Oh, I didn't know that. Don't recall ever hearing of such a thing. That
might be kinda neat ... or not. Worth trying, anyway.
I would still prefer using
Last Tuesday my brother got married (hooray !!)
I've been visiting 2 barber shops that day and off course the camera
was with me :)
so here is a small gallery with the best shots of that film (Trix 400
pushed to 800)
http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/WeddingPreps
PS: why did i push that 400ASA
Thanks for spelling edit!
Embarrassed, but grateful.:-)
Do you have a more optimistic view about the life of
positive color film?
Jack
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, August 25, 2005, at 08:00 PM, Godfrey
DiGiorgi wrote:
mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This news story is interesting in that it refers to Kodak's digital
business as expanding. I'm not sure that's accurate. The only digital
cameras that Kodak was actually building were their pro cameras, and
they
David,
Thanks for the retro trip.
My memories (too far back to totally relate here)
begin with sitting by my father in his basement
darkroom , nostrils full of the smell of chemistry,
and being amazed each time an image developed in the
tray.
First camera, Baby Brownie in about 1942. Took it to
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/08/26 Fri PM 01:11:21 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Film scanner question
mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the real test is scanning greens. the eye is most sensitive in that
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2005, at 08:49 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Informed sources whose jobs would be in danger if they were named. But
also anyone who's worked in a camera shop and had the opportunity to
hold the Tamron
Mark, any idea why the inkjet chemist person was,
seemingly, pessimistic?
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This news story is interesting in that it refers
to Kodak's digital
business as
Hi
How about the performance of M100/2.8?
--
__
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.asiamail.com
Send and receive SMS through your mailbox.
Powered by Outblaze
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I need to clarify some of this.:
When I was in Rochester last weekend I checked in with my friends who
work at Kodak. The ones who work in the division that makes imaging
chips seemed fairly optimistic but everyone else was absolutely gloomy.
First
Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark, any idea why the inkjet chemist person was,
seemingly, pessimistic?
Not specifically, but then it may not have been anything specific. This
long, slow attrition at Kodak has really killed morale there, even, I
suspect, amongst people whose jobs are
On Friday, August 26, 2005, at 08:57 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Thanks for spelling edit!
Embarrassed, but grateful.:-)
Do you have a more optimistic view about the life of
positive color film?
No. Consumers are using digital for what they used to use it for.
Pros are all using digital.
On Friday, August 26, 2005, at 09:23 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
To clarify: The only ones I've actually had in pieces were a Nikon
70-300 (or 75-300) and the corresponding Tamron. Absolutely identical
internally and externally.
It's possible that Nikon has changed to sourcing some lenses from
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/08/26 Fri PM 01:11:41 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO:Another Thinker
Subtle. I like that. I'll change my mail signature to
Tim. Mostly subtle, on second thoughts, I wont.
There is a link at the page gråskala, it makes
From last year on the PDML:
I think lens wipes is the one area Kodak will continue to dominate.
- Tom Van Veen
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/08/26 Fri PM 01:37:49 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The Nature of Film's Final Throes
mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This news story is interesting in that it refers to Kodak's
On Friday, August 26, 2005, at 10:03 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Not specifically, but then it may not have been anything specific. This
long, slow attrition at Kodak has really killed morale there, even, I
suspect, amongst people whose jobs are relatively safe. Incidentally, I
think pessimistic
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/08/26 Fri PM 01:38:04 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The Nature of Film's Final Throes
Mark, any idea why the inkjet chemist person was,
seemingly, pessimistic?
Jack
For all the extra shooting most digitalista do, most of
mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, as long as they buy the print I'm not picky...
I think this is an area where the photographic industry has dealt
itself a severe, if not mortal, blow. If you give Mr Mrs Sixpack
(who _do not care_ about quality) a way to look at their pictures for
Mark,
So will I. Please pass along RIT(?) gleanings as
possible.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I need to clarify some of this.:
When I was in Rochester last weekend I checked in
with my friends who
work at Kodak. The ones
Still seems to me to be a market that will enjoy
robust growth for some time.
Jack
--- mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/08/26 Fri PM 01:38:04 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The Nature of Film's Final Throes
Mark,
Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Go into a mass marketer that sells inkjet printers and count how many
Kodak printers you see for sale. In almost all cases it will be zero.
Look at inkjet paper and you'll see some Kodak packages, but that is
such a competitive market that I don't think
Yee ha! I don't have to bother getting prints to see my photos any
more! No more boxes of prints to store!
I suspect a lot of regular consumers (not all of them) feel this way,
too. Having boxes of prints to store is a hassle. Perhaps they'll regret
it years down the road, after a major hard
I have to pass along one more endearing film
experience;
My now 41 year old daughter who, when asked to suggest
some High School graduation gifts, immediately named,
a good camera.
She received a Pentax K1000 w/M-50mm f/1.7 (I
believe)and has since added short and medium Pentax
zooms.
Must mention
And you've the nerve to attach your name, address, and phone to this
LOL
You've ruined my morning coffee!
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Some cheesy song remakes:
Inna-Gouda-Vel-Veeta
Let it Brie
Ricotta Get Out of This Place
Cheeses Christ Superstar
Your
A more correct word would be apparent, not obvious ... sheesh!
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob Shell
On Friday, August 26, 2005, at 08:49 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Informed sources whose jobs would be in
danger if they were named. But
also anyone who's worked in a camera
shop
Bob Shell wrote:
Look at inkjet paper and you'll see some Kodak packages, but that is
such a competitive market that I don't think anyone is making much
money from it. There are just too many companies supplying inkjet paper.
Bob
I don't know about that. Supposedly it's what kept
Yeah, Tom Payne had some of these at GFM last weekend. They look
interesting.
Bob Shell wrote:
Have a look: www.warmcards.com I've used these for several years.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: R.C.Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The average digital consumer probably isn't going to print all his shots
anyway, just a few of the ones he needs or considers keepers So, there
is
the potential for less consumer paper use with digital even though there
is
oh, Lord, we're trying to =attract= people to the NPW. Let's not
threaten them with having to listen to me.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Anyone who hasn't yet attended a Grandfather Mountain Nature Photography
weekend take note: If you meet Doug in person
Which is why I expect that someone will manufacture BW film in the
future. I'm fairly certain that the supply curve for film
is U shaped. It doesn't have to be produced it extra huge quantities to
be economical. I also expect there will be color film stock
made for quite some time as well.
Av button next to the Shutter. Hold it down and rotate the wheel. Pretty
much standard on the various single-wheel cameras now (Nikon and Canon
do the same thing on their current single-wheel cameras)
-Adam
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
How would one set the aperture when using the lens manually,
mike wilson wrote:
From: Cesar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/08/26 Fri AM 02:21:46 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Survey: Your Most Unusual Shot
mike wilson wrote:
From: Cesar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1) I was sitting in a UH-1 with the doors open as we did a 'map of the
I'm sure you have a melodious voice.
Doug Brewer wrote:
oh, Lord, we're trying to =attract= people to the NPW. Let's not
threaten them with having to listen to me.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Anyone who hasn't yet attended a Grandfather Mountain Nature
Seems like the lack of printing is one of the major advantages. You don't
have to mess with prints and mailing them to friends and relatives, you just
e-mail them. I do agree with a prior poster though that the biggest loss
will be preservation. Grandma's 20-year old stash of prints in the
Nikon (And Canon) both have used several outsourced manufacturers for
their consumer lenses. Nikon's 70-300's are Tamrons, Cosina has also
done some for them (The FM10 and it's kit are Cosina, as was the old EM
and possibly the Series E lenses).
-Adam
Bob Shell wrote:
On Friday, August 26,
The HP's are excellent printers, but don't sell the Epson's short,
they've mostly solved the clogging issue, and there's a cheap fix for
the more modern printers (Windex on a wipe under the heads).
I'm printing 3K BW on a HP 7660 and BO on a Epson C86 and quite happy
with both. The HP does
In a message dated 8/25/2005 11:00:06 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie, that's a question deserving multiple answers!
My most unusual shot: would have to be a commission to photograph a dog's
grave for it's owner, who had had to leave it behind when she returned to
In a message dated 8/26/2005 6:47:18 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not specifically, but then it may not have been anything specific. This
long, slow attrition at Kodak has really killed morale there, even, I
suspect, amongst people whose jobs are relatively safe.
You did? There where three links in the post. The main link was to Another
Thinker, the first one was a site giving a bit background to the picture
(about the spot and the maker of the sculptures), the last one was just a
reminder. Thats the one you commented ;-)
In my reply I assumed it was the
On Friday, August 26, 2005, at 09:07 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Some cheesy song remakes:
And don't forget these enduring classics:
Bye Bye Swiss American (cheese) Pie?
My Provalona? (Sharonna)
Cheese, Cheese Me? (Please Please me)
I wanna Ricotta Roll All Night (and Havarti ever-y
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
