Seems like the lack of printing is one of the major advantages. You don't
have to mess with prints and mailing them to friends and relatives, you just
e-mail them. I do agree with a prior poster though that the biggest loss
will be preservation. Grandma's 20-year old stash of prints in the bottom
dresser drawer just aren't going to be there. That disturbs the historical
preservation bones in me.
J.W.L.
----- Original Message -----
From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 8:06 AM
Subject: Re: Re: The Nature of Film's Final Throes
From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2005/08/26 Fri PM 01:38:04 GMT
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: The Nature of Film's Final Throes
Mark, any idea why the "inkjet" chemist person was,
seemingly, pessimistic?
Jack
For all the extra shooting most digitalista do, most of them print far
less than they did when they used analogue.
mike
--- Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> From: Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >> <<snip>>>> > --
> Mark Roberts
> Photography and writing
> www.robertstech.com
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
