Oh, yeah!
On 9/20/05, Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK Folks, how vote you, Yea or Nay
Don
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
--
You have to hold the button down -Arnold Newman
Hi Barry.
Tooks aquick look at my emails an don;t see an answer to this question, so
i'll attempt
one.
I have the istD and the firm ware is upto date. Check the pentax web site to
see if
anything is
upgraded for the Ds.
I have been using raw as of late, and some other very experienced list
Where is the clarification I posted
right after the quoted post?
MILLIONS of K/M lenses they sold over
the years. MILLIONS of purchases, not
MILLIONS of purchasers because of the
many who bought more than one K/M lens.
jco
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Too bad its not even remotely true, see by last post.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 6:10 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: RE: Petition to Pentax? (was Re: How Pentax Could Survive)
Very well explained.
Totally redesigned electronics? You
cant be very understanding of electronics design or serious, why
would you EVER totally redesign the
electronics to add a simple single modification?
Thats certainly not necessary.
nowadays there are a lot of processors
and controllers (most of them?) that
have
I checked visually and it didn't appear to be separation. Its strange
because a couple of the images shot appear very normal. I going to have
a tech take a look and ask the eBay seller about his return policy,
although it has been about three weeks since I bought the lens.
Jay
On Sep 20,
herb,
i like your pictures a lot, but with this statement...
you are either naive or an idiot, or trying to pretend you are.
or an analyst, which would be the worst case.
mishka
On 9/20/05, Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, i look at the underlying data that the analysts are using and i
they have cell phones, so they, at least theoretically, can
get on the web with GPRS.
mishka
On 9/20/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/20/05, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
He makes the Amish look positively groovy.snip
Is it okay to make fun of the Amish on
It is, of course, incorrect to say the Amish don't have electricity.
What they do not have is an electricity distribution system, and
they don't use electricity if something else (such as compressed
air - a common power source) can do the job.
Some Amish do even have computers - often powered by
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 20/9/05, Tom C, discombobulated,
unleashed:
Doesn't it take two to argue?
No it doesn't.
Cheers,
Cotty
I could be arguing in my spare time.:-)
Dave(here we go)Brooks
Well, can't resist
Totally redesigned electronics? There would be no need to totally redesign
the electronics to add a simple single modification? Thats certainly not
necessary. nowadays there are a lot of processors and controllers (most of
them?) that have a whole bunch of on chip ANALOG and digital inputs and
I just took a peek at the lens mount/mirror box on my D. The mirror box
assembly currently precludes doing this mod without a redesigned mirror
box. The current design offers no way for the coupler to pass through,
even if cut away, there's not enough clearance by the looks of things.
The
Hi!
Mesa agreeing...
Boris
Hi!
Okay, it's blurry. It's not a motion blur like a car, scooter, bike
or even a pedestrian going by. It's me, the photographer, moving past
the scene that's causing the blur. When I'm walking through a crowded
city, I don't make connections with most of those that I pass. I only
see them
Ok,
I am not sure if what your saying is good
or bad news. If a new chassis is required
that means more time, but on the other
hand that MIGHT mean other improvements
too. Only time will tell. As far as the
electronics go, it sounds like its unknown
if the the electronics need any or minor
Hi!
A view of Arundel Castle:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/37p.htm
Comments and critique always appreciated.
Godfrey, it seems few of your latest PESOs are made with 14 mm lens...
Liking it you are ;-).
I think it is a good picture though it is different from what you've
Hi!
well, how about that! If you don't look at the details of the image,
what do you see? An eye! Very cool.
Ditto! The cat's eye.
Grand!
Boris
Hi!
That's an interesting photo, Boris. I like the different expressions
on their faces. She has a very relaxed and easy smile; although he's
smiling, I sense a hint of suspicion or discomfort in his face -
ironic, as he's holding a camera! vbg
May be he actually spotted me and grew
Hi!
Very nice image. Somehow the look in their eyes (especially hers) is
captivating. The bw adds to the image. Nicely done. You'll need to
go to England more often :)
Let's generalize a bit, shall we? I need to go abroad more often :-).
Anyone willing to donate few 10^6's bucks? ;-)
Hi!
I like the photograph a lot. The rendering seems a touch flat on my
screen, however, and lacks a bit of sparkle. It looks better when
expanded to view with a black matte.
Godfrey, it just occurred to me that it was designed to be viewed on
black. On www.PhotoSight.ru, where it is
Hi!
Very nice, Boris! Very, very nice for a spontaneous portrait. Good framing.
Marnie, it is roughly 2/3 of the original frame. There was another
person sitting next to them, probably their child or relative, but I
decided to frame that person out ;-).
Thanks.
Boris
No, I think John Mustarde (Texdance) would be much more interesting.
Did'nt he have a bet with Pal that involved nailing some private parts
to a tree if a Pentax digital SLR camera wasn't delivered by a certain
date? Bob S.
On 9/20/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pål, join the fray! All we
The Amish, have Cell Phones? I think that's literally against their
religion.
Mishka wrote:
they have cell phones, so they, at least theoretically, can
get on the web with GPRS.
mishka
On 9/20/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/20/05, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for your comments, everyone! So you know, the second image was
primarily to illustrate to people who read my blog (where I originally
posted these shots) what sort of capabilities one has when shooting macro,
and when using a good slide film. I think Frank got the idea:
Frank wrote:
Nope - that's just stereotyping. The Amish aren't anti-technology;
they just evaluate any new technology before possibly using it.
Cell phones can be found in (some) Amish communities.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 12:23:12AM -0400, P. J. Alling wrote:
The Amish, have Cell Phones? I think that's
The mirror box is molded plastic. Compare it to the mirror box in a the
zx5n it even has the same channels.
Adam Maas wrote:
I just took a peek at the lens mount/mirror box on my D. The mirror
box assembly currently precludes doing this mod without a redesigned
mirror box. The current
How about the performance of M 100/2.8?
**
There's not much choice in the 70mm~90mm range except for the various 85mm
lenses, both in screw mount and in K mount. They all tend to be a bit
spendy, more or less. If you can live with
My Question:
Specifically, I asked about how many more camera body sales
Pentax might have lost by not including full K/M compatibility.
I also asked for estimates of the costs related to adding the
capability. Let me clarify my question and ask you for an
estimate of how many camera body
On Sep 20, 2005, at 9:55 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
I like the photograph a lot. The rendering seems a touch flat on
my screen, however, and lacks a bit of sparkle. It looks better
when expanded to view with a black matte.
Godfrey, it just occurred to me that it was designed to be viewed
On Sep 20, 2005, at 9:49 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
A view of Arundel Castle:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/37p.htm
... it seems few of your latest PESOs are made with 14 mm lens...
Liking it you are ;-).
I think it is a good picture though it is different from what
OK Folks, how vote you, Yea or Nay
Don
Hear hear!
I mean, yaay!
Erm, that is, yea!
Thanks for doing this, Don. I was afraid the whole petition idea would get
swept under the rug unless someone actually started one, and I couldn't do
it myself, what with this pain in all the
yes it does but if you don't do the full analysis
either then this particular aspect of the issue
is just plain unknown and it limits your argument too
and should be set aside. It doesn't limit my argument any more than
it limits your or anyone elses opposing viewpoint
if its an unknown now does
I just picked up a KX I have on display
here in the bedroom and the cam sensor
is seen a ring the same size as the lens throat
just behind the lens flange and its
about 8mm thick, are you sure this area
is obstructed and by what? the reason I
ask is the cameras have the same size mount
and same
In a message dated 9/20/2005 7:58:03 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I could be arguing in my spare time.:-)
Dave(here we go)Brooks
Well, can't resist posting this:
http://www.mindspring.com/~mfpatton/sketch.htm
Cheers,
Brian
ROFL.
Marnie aka Doe
In a message dated 9/20/2005 9:02:42 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
Very nice, Boris! Very, very nice for a spontaneous portrait. Good framing.
Marnie, it is roughly 2/3 of the original frame. There was another
person sitting next to them, probably their child or
In a message dated 9/20/2005 5:46:32 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey troops.
Just thought i'd pass along to those that care, i have submitted my 20
entries to this
years fair
photo contest.
Always hoping to get a prize, but thats not what drives me. Just to compete
and
To further elucidate:
I don't think this business decision is nearly
as simple as you make it to be even
if you new exactly how many camera unit
sales were gained or lost by inclusion
or removal of the K/M support. Its
because if you lose a sale on the camera
you may also lose ALL future sales on
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 07:51:03PM -0500, Don Sanderson wrote:
Hi John, I like your ideas.
The one thing that I feel is a must is that we all
decide the what, when, who and where via a common
consensus (vote).
We need one person ultimately responsible for the
final format.
If all of us
301 - 338 of 338 matches
Mail list logo
