On Feb 7, 2006, at 1:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only an hour?!?
Yeah, I read fast.
-Aaron
Well, no it isn't, necessarily. Much of the time the joke is
aimed at the male - the butt of the humour isn't the
character being personified, but rather at the impersonator.
No point trying to explain a joke. Especially to people who can't laugh at
themselves.
And even if it had
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/02/06 Mon PM 11:57:21 GMT
To: Kenneth Waller pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: mirror/cat lenses
Aaron, I've used the Tamron SP 500mm f8.0. If this is the only way you
can shoot a 500mm you have a need for it I recommend you go for it.
By
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/02/07 Tue AM 01:41:00 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: mirror/cat lenses
Thanks for those suggestions, though I was looking more for information on
the look of cat lenses -- I want a different look to some of the images from
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marnie aka Doe :-) Well, enuff said. It's basically sexist humor if you
can't figure that out.
Certainly is; but it's the males that are being mocked.
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R)
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/02/07 Tue AM 04:37:00 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
The messages I'm referring to were vulgar and aggressive. If you want to
know why the idea was canned, ask your brethren why they needed
Just one more:
PUG: Pentax Users Gallery.
http://pug.komkon.org
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Fernando Terrazzino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 8:36 PM
Subject: RE: PESO - Fernando Terrazzino
Thanks Jens
I'll print this out
From: Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/02/07 Tue AM 06:26:11 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Sealing lens barrel
Hi everybody!
I was wondering if anybody has had any experience in sealing lens
barrel against water and/or dust with any type of tape/sealant.
The
Haven't received the usual deluge of PDML today, so I might just test to
see if I'm still subscribed.
So this isn't a completely contentless post, I received an invoice from
Adorama today. You may remember I had a bit of a drama with them last
year (and onto this year) with an order from
Hi,
I'm back again from a months vacation.
Any super new releases from Pentax or something
else worth mentioning?
Antti-Pekka
Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Computec Oy Turku
www.computec.fi
On Feb 6, 2006, at 6:41 PM, Fred wrote:
Which VS1, Godfrey? I have found the VS1 600/8 to be quite good,
but I was
disappointed in the VS1 800/11 (two samples, too).
The 800 seems to have been somewhat of a dog. I've known a number of
people who bought them and none of them were
On Feb 6, 2006, at 8:05 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Nice shot. You could easily paint out the rings in PhotoShop.
Paul
One thing I have always loved is the fiction of technical data in
photo captions in photography magazines. Photographers often don't
remember or remember wrong. My
On Feb 6, 2006, at 8:41 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Bob, focus is primarily pre-focusing (home plate, first base,
etc). Is the depth of field shallower than a conventional lens at
the same aperture? Toronto's baseball stadium is domed, and though
it is retractable, 80% of the games are at
On Feb 7, 2006, at 4:34 AM, mike wilson wrote:
The _real_ difficulty with this lens is that it fits nicely in the
palm of your hand. So the temptation to use it that way, despite
numerous examples of it not working, is very high. It is very
difficult to overcome the feeling that _this
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Fred wrote:
Yes. At f/3.5, it's (barely, by Pentax standards)) just fast enough to
autofocus even with the 1.7X's light loss (although in reasonably bright
light I've used both the A 28-135/4 and the A 70-210/4 with the 1.7X
adapter - mostly for fun, I might add, not for
Has anyone ever tried one of these?
https://www.adorama.com/BG3420.html
I have 3 lenses, 300/4, 400/5.6 and 500/5.6 that have
no tripod socket.
Suggestions welcome.
Don
On Feb 7, 2006, at 7:47 AM, Don Sanderson wrote:
Has anyone ever tried one of these?
https://www.adorama.com/BG3420.html
I have 3 lenses, 300/4, 400/5.6 and 500/5.6 that have
no tripod socket.
Suggestions welcome.
I've tested that Manfrotto gadget. It's a great solution for any
tele
Thanks Bob.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Bob Shell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 7:00 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Tele lens support
On Feb 7, 2006, at 7:47 AM, Don Sanderson wrote:
Has anyone ever tried one of these?
I've forgotten. Who is the owner/moderator for this list? I just
got a mailbox full of those damned bounce mails from
studiogriffanti . The owner/moderator needs to unsubscribe this person!
Bob
On 2/6/06, Keith McGuinness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
In the Lumberjack song, which was way back at the start of this
thread (and the origin of the line I wear high heels, suspenders
and a bra), the object of ridicule (IMO) is the macho
stereotype personified by the lumberjack (apologies
On 2/7/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I read fast.
Either that or delete liberally. g
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Thanks for the heads-up on the factory! That's some news I can use.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: mirror/cat lenses
Date: Tue Feb 7, 2006 7:20 am
Size: 1K
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
On Feb 6, 2006, at 6:41 PM, Fred wrote:
Which VS1,
Pentax is refocussing their RD and now will make flying cars.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Antti-Pekka Virjonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: I'm back (again)
Date: Tue Feb 7, 2006 4:33 am
Size: 228 bytes
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Hi,
I'm back again from a months vacation.
Any
Op Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:55:25 +0100 schreef frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2/6/06, Keith McGuinness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
In the Lumberjack song, which was way back at the start of this
snip
I always thought they were making fun of Canadians.
Or weatherforecasters :o)
For
On Feb 7, 2006, at 8:59 AM, frank theriault wrote:
Yeah, I read fast.
Either that or delete liberally. g
Yes, that too.
-Aaron
Last evening I visited three stores to check prices and to possibly order
an istDS2. Buydig and Beach Camera, and another the name of which I've
forgotten, didn't list the camera as being available. Some other stores -
more expensive generally - did show the camera in stock. Odd ... I'll have
Yes, PLEASE!
Jack
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've forgotten. Who is the owner/moderator for this list? I just
got a mailbox full of those damned bounce mails from
studiogriffanti . The owner/moderator needs to unsubscribe this
person!
Bob
Yeah, it would be great if you could buy a camera and not have to contend
with upgrading your software. The idea of just picking up the camera and
making a few shots without additional worries or concerns is very
appealing. Over on the Photoshop User-to-User forum people are frequently
lamenting
Hey, Guys ...
Why don't you just block any mail from that sender? Doesn't your software
allow you to do that?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jack Davis
Yes, PLEASE!
Jack
--- Bob Shell wrote:
I've forgotten. Who is the owner/moderator for this list?
I just got a mailbox full
Op Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:43:25 +0100 schreef Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've forgotten. Who is the owner/moderator for this list?
See www.pdml.net
I just got a mailbox full of those damned bounce mails from
studiogriffanti . The owner/moderator needs to unsubscribe this person!
--
Oh my!.
I suppose a bigger surprise is to find you (Aaron) are back
on the list as well ;-).
Still using the Epson 7500?
Antti-Pekka
Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Computec Oy Turku
www.computec.fi
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Reynolds
On Feb 7, 2006, at 9:31 AM, Antti-Pekka Virjonen wrote:
Still using the Epson 7500?
Yep! It was behaving badly for a while, but then we put it in the car
and moved it somewhere else and a chunk of pigment the size of a subway
token fell out of it, followed by a torrent of pigment, and now
On Feb 7, 2006, at 9:13 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Last evening I visited three stores to check prices and to possibly
order
an istDS2. Buydig and Beach Camera, and another the name of which I've
forgotten, didn't list the camera as being available. Some other
stores -
more expensive
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Mat Maessen wrote:
2. Specular highlights tend to flare. I first noticed this in chrome
trim on a car. I can point to pictures to demonstrate. Probably due to
the large number of glass elements in the lens.
Can you please show a picture demonstrating that? I am interested
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=1263961
The old customs hall at the Montzen railway goods yard in Belgium.
Freezing cold. Note the trees on the left all covered with ice.
Been spending a completely analog weekend for a change since the DS is
at Hamburg
On 2/7/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Specular highlights tend to flare. I first noticed this in chrome
trim on a car. I can point to pictures to demonstrate. Probably due to
the large number of glass elements in the lens.
Can you please show a picture demonstrating
Thanks for your thoughts on the matter ... I'm really getting frustrated
with Pentax. The D2 was just recently released sigh
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Aaron Reynolds
On Feb 7, 2006, at 9:13 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Last evening I visited three stores to check prices and to
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=1263961
The old customs hall at the Montzen railway goods yard in Belgium.
Freezing cold. Note the trees on the left all covered with ice.
I like this one. Stark, cold ... Might like a BW rendering more. :-)
Godfrey
test test test
I think part of it is the DL2 -- I really don't know how they compare, but the
DL2 is 'newer'.
I saw one press release that said the DS2 was back by popular demand --
meaning it's already been off the market once. I don't know what the sales
numbers are like, but I'm sure there's no
Mine just arrived while I was typing that.
-Aaron
And then donated to Samsung?
Go figure ...
2006/2/7, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks for your thoughts on the matter ... I'm really getting frustrated
with Pentax. The D2 was just recently released sigh
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Aaron Reynolds
On Feb 7, 2006, at 9:13
got it got it got it
2006/2/7, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
test test test
--
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
That's not real flare - it's just a mirror refletion of the sun - shaped
like a star, caused by the aperture blades.
This is flare:
http://www.ghostweb.com/lens_1.gif
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/flare.shtml
Wasn't it part of an image processing software trade? Pentax has a long
history of trading technology, and it has made their products stronger.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: No istDS2 in some stores
Date: Tue Feb 7, 2006 10:38 am
Size: 1K
The list is behaving very erratically at the moment. You are not alone!
John
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:27:56 -, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
test test test
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
The test was for something else, not the list mail. Am having trouble with
earthlink's spam blocker. It thinks I'm a spammer ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2/7/2006 7:53:48 AM
Subject: Re: Test -
Both Adorama and B H have the DS 2 in stock.
DG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/6/2006 2:10:13 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I unsubscribed when I went on my honeymoon in June '02 and when I came back
I found that I had this extra hour every day that I didn't have before...
What's yer point?
Aaron wrote:
I think part of it is the DL2 -- I really don't know how they compare, but
the
DL2 is 'newer'.
I saw one press release that said the DS2 was back by popular demand --
meaning it's already been off the market once. I don't know what the sales
numbers are like, but I'm sure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/6/2006 8:37:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The messages I'm referring to were vulgar and aggressive. If you want to
know why the idea was canned, ask your brethren why they needed to write dear
jackass letters.
I didn't
On Feb 2, 2006, at 9:11, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Feb 2, 2006, at 8:57, Fred wrote:
Does anyone have any experiences (good and/or bad) to report
regarding
KatzEye screens (besides price, which is not a good) ?
I should know in a few days - I ordered one on Monday.
Will definitely
Did that...I thought! Will try it again and hit the keys harder. =)
Jack
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, Guys ...
Why don't you just block any mail from that sender? Doesn't your
software
allow you to do that?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jack Davis
I'm brand new in this list, and I'm not receiving this spam (no, not using
any anti-spam; new email account) so I'm just wondering if these mails are
really comming through the list or, whoever is sending this, already have
all your emails stored somewhere else...
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL
As I said in another post, the DS2 is, and has been, in stock at BH Photo
and Adorama.
DG
At 07:59 AM 2/7/2006 -0800, you wrote:
Aaron wrote:
I think part of it is the DL2 -- I really don't know how they compare, but
the
DL2 is 'newer'.
I saw one press release that said the DS2 was back
On Feb 7, 2006, at 10:15, Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
I'm brand new in this list, and I'm not receiving this spam (no,
not using any anti-spam; new email account) so I'm just wondering
if these mails are really comming through the list or, whoever is
sending this, already have all your
On Feb 7, 2006, at 11:05 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Did that...I thought! Will try it again and hit the keys harder. =)
Me too. I just sent a note to the list guy asking him to unsubscribe
this person. Hopefully he will.
Bob
Ditto here. I'm not seeing any unusual email. Well, I mean spam email.
There's plenty unusual email around here. :)
Tim
On 2/7/06 8:20, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Feb 7, 2006, at 10:15, Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
I'm brand new in this list, and I'm not receiving this spam (no,
not using
Godfrey,
I stated in my original post, that I had lost the original message. After
reading your copy of it, I find that I insinuated nothing at all. The words
more trouble than it is worth are hardly kind words for a business to use
in any context when their customers are involved.
Thanks.. I've thought of that :-).
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nice shot. You could easily paint out the rings in PhotoShop.
Paul
On Feb 6, 2006, at 7:11 PM, Tom C wrote:
I have a Tokina 500/f8. I think I paid $75 for it used (like new and in
leather case). The
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Feb 7, 2006, at 10:15, Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
I'm brand new in this list, and I'm not receiving this spam (no, not
using any anti-spam; new email account) so I'm just wondering if
these mails are really comming through the list or, whoever is
sending this,
I think that if Aaron's comments about PDML members being rude and abusive
are true, then the words more trouble than it is worth is certainly
appropriate. FWIW, I believe Aaron based on some posts I've seen on this
list at various times. A lot of people shoot their mouths off and act in a
For my part, I was extremely polite and business like. I think it was the
lack of 'official sounding' wording that led to the questions people had
(the word copyright was never used) and the fact that the request came
second hand (albeit through Frank :-) )
Tom C.
From: Aaron Reynolds
Sorry for any bother ...
Shel
Those types of responses were definitely out of line. Why not just ignore
those people instead of withdraw the request?
Tom C.
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
Date: Mon, 6
Tom, Pentax Canada, like Pentax USA, produce nothing. They import and re-sell
cameras atincreasingly poorer margins.
If you had read the e-mails, you'd know why they canned it. They were
disgusting.
They were looking for goodwill and attempting to engage their customer base in
a friendly,
Bob Shell wrote:
Me too. I just sent a note to the list guy asking him to unsubscribe
this person. Hopefully he will.
Hi Bob and Shel,
I receive a lot of spam evewry day, but nothing through the list, nothing I
can link to PDML.
How do you think that spam you receive is generated via the
Shel wrote:
I think that if Aaron's comments about PDML members being rude and abusive
are true, then the words more trouble than it is worth is certainly
appropriate. FWIW, I believe Aaron based on some posts I've seen on this
list at various times. A lot of people shoot their mouths off
Tom, it's hard to ignore repeated insulting e-mails. They're not robots.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
Date: Tue Feb 7, 2006 11:49 am
Size: 1K
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Those types of responses were definitely
I had both my ISP's shut down incoming PDML mail yesterday. Only one
of them is back now. I would assume it was for the same cause.
Probably considered spam. Really a pain to get straightened out.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 5:43:25 AM, you wrote:
BS I've forgotten. Who is the
It's not advertising spam, it's bounce messages -- every message I send to the
list I get back from this one guy's mailserver, telling me not to e-mail him
anymore because his inbox is full.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Who is the
The fact remains that the idea was ineptly executed. It is surprising
that a company operating in the imaging field didn't give full
consideration to the question of copyright. And whilst the request to
this list came via personal introduction, those sent to certain other
lists did not -
I know this is not Pentax related directly, so it might be labeled OT,
but we've discussed photographer rights many times so I thought many
here would be interested:
From a comment to my photoblog:
--
Great shot. I love checking your site and being envious of your
ability and accessibility to
OK, I understand. It never happened to me.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: Who is the owner/moderator?
It's not advertising spam, it's bounce messages -- every message
Aaron,
I'm not beating you up over this... please believe that. I understand what
Pentax Canada does, they do however represent Pentax (the company that
produces cameras and photography equipment).
I just don't get how you're jumping to the conclusion that you assume they
intended to steal
On Feb 7, 2006, at 11:54 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Hi Bob and Shel,
I receive a lot of spam evewry day, but nothing through the list,
nothing I can link to PDML.
How do you think that spam you receive is generated via the list?
Dario
Each is a bounce notification, and has one of my
I agree. Thanks and glad you liked the birdy, :-)
Tom C.
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The fact remains that the idea was ineptly executed. It is surprising
that a company operating in the imaging field didn't give full
consideration to the question of copyright. And whilst the
BTW Aaron, it's nice to see you on the list again. I'm honestly not trying
to get off on the wrong foot with you.
Tom C.
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006
I think it's Dario's fault. He's in Italy isn't he? ;-)
Tom C.
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Who is the owner/moderator?
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 18:12:15 +0100
OK, I understand. It never happened to me.
Dario
Thanks for the link - will read the article later.
It's getting so that I may just take up water colors. Funny, photogs are
banned and put upon, but someone setting up an easel and ~painting~ a
picture is not a problem or a concern.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Juan Buhler
From a
It's not spam ... it's bounced messages. I was getting them sporadically
and then decided to just block the sender and the domain.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Dario Bonazza
Bob Shell wrote:
Me too. I just sent a note to the list guy asking him to unsubscribe
this person.
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might like a BW rendering more. :-)
I've been thinking about that, too. I'll show you another one from the
same series in b/w, later tonight.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
There's your cover!
Tom C.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's getting so that I may just take up water colors. Funny, photogs are
banned and put upon, but someone setting up an easel and ~painting~ a
picture is not a problem or a concern.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Juan
On 2/7/06 11:24 AM, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might like a BW rendering more. :-)
I've been thinking about that, too. I'll show you another one from the
same series in b/w, later tonight.
Ralf
Ralf, the shot is great as is.
Why do you assume they didn't consider copyright? Usage was explicitly laid
out in the initial mail.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
Date: Tue Feb 7, 2006 12:03 pm
Size: 2K
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
The fact
In a message dated 2/7/2006 8:24:55 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Feb 7, 2006, at 10:15, Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
I'm brand new in this list, and I'm not receiving this spam (no,
not using any anti-spam; new email account) so I'm just wondering
if these mails
Maybe because some of us would have expected the word copyright to have
been used? It's used just about everywhere else when it comes to
photography.
I understand inherent copyright... but that doesn't stop copyright symbols
and statements from being plastered just about everywhere by the
In a message dated 2/7/2006 1:19:37 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With all respect, Marnie; any group who find themselves being the
subjects of jokes may take the same stance.
I think women have the advantage of a better defined sex role, and a
better outlook on how they
Powell Hargrave wrote:
How is the DA 18-55? A little background here. I seldom shoot wide angle and
I own both the K28/35 and K35/35, so I wouldn't normally use it above 28mm.
I know the 16-45 is a superior lens but I don't think I would use it enough
to warrant the extra cost.
Mine
Hi,
I have had Rubinar 300/f4.5 for some year now and used it mostly for
nature. It's quite compact and light for 300mm lens and gives better
than average image quality. Rather good than bad.
There have definitely been problems with quality as my friend got the
same lens with much worse
Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hi everybody!
I was wondering if anybody has had any experience in sealing lens
barrel against water and/or dust with any type of tape/sealant.
The area of the barrel that would need to be sealed
is away from the junction between rotating elements.
Does this sound too
In a message dated 2/7/2006 6:22:36 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, it would be great if you could buy a camera and not have to contend
with upgrading your software. The idea of just picking up the camera and
making a few shots without additional worries or concerns is
In a message dated 2/7/2006 5:58:34 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip
In the Lumberjack song, which was way back at the start of this
thread (and the origin of the line I wear high heels, suspenders
and a bra), the object of ridicule (IMO) is the macho
stereotype
Aaron,
You knew the guy. Nobody else did. I first saw this request on another
list where it just arrived, anonymous and unannounced. Everybody assumed
it was some sort of con., and that feeling was reinforced by the lack of
any connection to the Pentax Canada website.
People were
What happens in Quebec, does not usually reflect what happens in the rest of
the country.
Dave
Thanks for the link - will read the article
later.
It's getting so that I may just take up water colors. Funny, photogs are
banned and put upon, but
I thought such was the basis for being unsubscribed.(?)
Jack
--- Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not advertising spam, it's bounce messages -- every message I
send to the list I get back from this one guy's mailserver, telling
me not to e-mail him anymore because his inbox is
Aaron.
Just so you know, i ordered my 16mm Zenitar from rugift in November, and the
transaction
went smoothly.
Godfrey has used them as well and he recommended the site to moi.:-)Took about
3 weeks to
arrive.
Dave
Now this isn't to say that you will get
I put six images in a tiny gallery. They were
taken with the S5Z last summer. I have done
nothing to them they're right out of the camera
and from a huge directory of more than 1000
pictures I took over a week. If you want more --
indoors, bad light etc let me know. I don't have
that little
I got several awhile back and blocked the domain. Just one received
since and that was yesterday, 2/6.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/7/2006 8:24:55 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Feb 7, 2006, at 10:15, Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
I'm brand
If true, we'll probably wind up paying for protection.
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's Dario's fault. He's in Italy isn't he? ;-)
Tom C.
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Who is
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
