At 01:07 PM 10/08/2006, you wrote:
I was employed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
in the RADAR Science and Technology group from 1984 to 1988.
That makes me feel pretty shallow.
I spent most of 84'-88' sitting on the back of a boat drinking Flaming
Lamborghinis, listening to Depeche Mode
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060810101241
Father and child instead of mother and child icon.
--
home http://roman.blakout.net/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Yes I'd like to know more about it too, specialy I'd like to know
about EX18-50/2.8 against DA16-45/4.
2006/8/10, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I ended up buying the Sigma tonight. It just suited my needs.
Amita
-
Amita, please let us know what you think of it.
Thanks,
Joe
--
On Aug 10, 2006, at 12:02 AM, David Savage wrote:
I was employed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
in the RADAR Science and Technology group from 1984 to 1988.
That makes me feel pretty shallow.
I spent most of 84'-88' sitting on the back of a boat drinking
Flaming
Lamborghinis,
At 04:21 PM 10/08/2006, you wrote:
On Aug 10, 2006, at 12:02 AM, David Savage wrote:
I was employed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
in the RADAR Science and Technology group from 1984 to 1988.
That makes me feel pretty shallow.
I spent most of 84'-88' sitting on the back of a boat
I've read a few months ago about a PS camera that features such
software shake reduction. The camera movement (kernel) is detected
by actual accelerometers just like with hardware AS, but the shake
correction is not done physically through lens or sensor position
control, but by an embedded
I purchased a fake SanDisk CF card on eBay, and fortunately got my money
back pretty easily. Nonetheless, I just thought I'd pass the following
info on so that those here could be all the wiser.
Article on FAKE SanDisk Ultra Compact Flash Cards Exposed
http://tinyurl.com/zqemt
The sellers name
I would like to find articles/web pages comparing the two different ways
for solving antishake:
adjust sensor in the body - adjust optic elements in the lens
I would appreciate your view on this subject and your links to
interesting articles/web pages.
Do you think Pentax are choosing the
On Aug 10, 2006, at 4:39 AM, Bengt Falke wrote:
adjust sensor in the body - adjust optic elements in the lens
...
Do you think Pentax are choosing the best way?
Everything is a compromise. There is no such thing as a simple 'best'.
Building lenses with optical image stabilization means
On Aug 10, 2006, at 8:13 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Buying the K100D or the upcoming 10Mpixel body
will extend IS feature to using my existing lenses, which I am
already happy with, so it preserves my investment and costs me only
the incremental addition of another body to my existing kit.
Doug Franklin wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Perhaps it could be reverse engineered to *add* authentic simulated
camera shake to photos that don't already have it!
Or I could hand Frank my camera. ;-
I think the reciprocal of Nyquist frequency should be dubbed the
Theriault frequency. Surely it
I think the Fuji F30 has that kind of system in it. I'll know more on
Friday when mine arrives.
Godfrey
On Aug 10, 2006, at 3:09 AM, Patrice LACOUTURE wrote:
I've read a few months ago about a PS camera that features such
software shake reduction. The camera movement (kernel) is detected
2006/8/10, Bengt Falke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would like to find articles/web pages comparing the two different ways
for solving antishake:
adjust sensor in the body - adjust optic elements in the lens
I would appreciate your view on this subject and your links to
interesting articles/web
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Holy crap -- according to the headers, the internet got this three minutes
before you sent it!
YOU CAN GO BACK IN TIME! I'm sorry I ever doubted you, Dave
Since he can go backwards in time, you should apologise that you are
*going to* doubt him ;-)
--
Mark Roberts
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: One more time check
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Holy crap -- according to the headers, the internet got this three
minutes before you sent it!
YOU CAN GO BACK IN TIME! I'm sorry I ever doubted you, Dave
Since he can go backwards in
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Holy crap -- according to the headers, the internet got this three minutes
before you
sent it!
YOU CAN GO BACK IN TIME! I'm sorry I ever doubted you, Dave
Since he can go backwards in time, you should apologise that you are
Tom C wrote:
Our dog Dot, a Blue Heeler, after a romp in the water.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4776813
Tom C.
What, you don't want her to have a fair shake? :)
Nice portrait, Tom
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
But I already HAVE doubted him!
Stupid Star Trek time paradox...
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: One more time check
Date: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:08 am
Size: 451 bytes
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Holy crap
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/longlittlekittybw.jpg
I'm having such fun
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
But I already HAVE doubted him!
Stupid Star Trek time paradox...
As Douglas Adams noted in the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, time
travel was*, by its very nature, invented at *every* point in history.
:-P
* Yes, this makes the use of the past tense was somewhat
- Original Message -
From: Bengt Falke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
adjust sensor in the body - adjust optic elements in the lens
I would appreciate your view on this subject and your links to
interesting articles/web pages.
Do you think Pentax are choosing the best way?
Yes. Pentax is
Cute, different, and nicely composed. A catpic keeper:-)
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/longlittlekittybw.jpg
I'm having such fun
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Patrice LACOUTURE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Both seem to have the following cons:
- Power consumption (a monopod or a faster lens work without batteries)
This is wrong if Pentax is to be believed. SR only start to work the moment
the shutter is released (in
Ann, what could you have possibly done to deserve that fur person? :)
Anyway, good for you!
Jack
--- Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/longlittlekittybw.jpg
I'm having such fun
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
In our Canon S3 IS there is a setting for when it is used together with
a converter in font of the lens so I guess that the in-body anti shake
must know the focal length to be able to calculate the anti shake
compensation.
I suppose new lenses have connections for this, but how do you enter
Jack Davis wrote:
Ann, what could you have possibly done to deserve that fur person? :)
Anyway, good for you!
Jack
LOL -- I'm not sure whether you are wondering how GOOD I've
been or how Naughty :)
ann
--- Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/10/06, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I'd like to know more about it too, specialy I'd like to know
about EX18-50/2.8 against DA16-45/4.
2006/8/10, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Amita, please let us know what you think of it.
Thanks,
Joe
I'm taking it out this
On Aug 10, 2006, at 10:50 AM, Bengt Falke wrote:
I suppose new lenses have connections for this, but how do you enter
this for old lenses (I have some of those) on the K100/K10D?
It has a way to manually enter the focal length up to 800mm.
-Aaron
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Me either. :P
Jack
--- Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
Ann, what could you have possibly done to deserve that fur
person? :)
Anyway, good for you!
Jack
LOL -- I'm not sure whether you are wondering how GOOD I've
been or how Naughty :)
ann
---
Sweet shot, Roman!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, August 10, 2006, 12:22:35 AM, you wrote:
R http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060810101241
R Father and child instead of mother and child icon.
R --
R home http://roman.blakout.net/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
So where is the saw?
--
Bruce
Thursday, August 10, 2006, 6:34:31 AM, you wrote:
AS http://users.rcn.com/annsan/longlittlekittybw.jpg
AS I'm having such fun
AS ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hi!
Tomorrow with G-d help I'd board the plain and go for a two weeks long
vacation abroad. Thus I shall unsubscribe from the list in few hours
;-).
Hopefully I have what to present for PAWs and PUG...
--
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
In a message dated 8/9/2006 12:05:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060806183540
Looks like I'll be making more sessions with this model and your comment
to my initial improvisations would be appreciated.
Thank you.
Mediterranean
=
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 03:02:11PM +0800, David Savage wrote:
At 01:07 PM 10/08/2006, you wrote:
I was employed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
in the RADAR Science and Technology group from 1984 to 1988.
That makes me feel pretty shallow.
I spent most of 84'-88' sitting on the back
Hopefully..is good.
Don't let the chase cut too deeply into your relaxation.
Jack
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Tomorrow with G-d help I'd board the plain and go for a two weeks
long
vacation abroad. Thus I shall unsubscribe from the list in few hours
;-).
Hopefully
Let's see...grades 2-6...that would have been 1948-52. :}
-P
David Savage wrote:
You guy's are making me feel really young.
'84-'88 were grades 2-6 for me.
:-)
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Bruce Dayton wrote:
So where is the saw?
--
I don't see it anywhere
ann
Bruce
Thursday, August 10, 2006, 6:34:31 AM, you wrote:
AS http://users.rcn.com/annsan/longlittlekittybw.jpg
AS I'm having such fun
AS ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks to everyone for the comments on the photo.
Jack, yes it sounds a little funny when we call her Dot, Come!
Both dogs understand a little Morse Code... Dot, Dash!
Tom C.
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or
numbered.
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL
:-))
J
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to everyone for the comments on the photo.
Jack, yes it sounds a little funny when we call her Dot, Come!
Both dogs understand a little Morse Code... Dot, Dash!
Tom C.
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed,
I have recently become frustrated by the fact that a couple of
third-party lenses I like are not available in Pentax mount.
Yesterday, I emailed Tamron to ask them if their 17-50 f/2.8 would
someday be available for Pentax, and they said no. When I wrote back
to ask if they would consider
Pentax is going to be selling a 16/50/2.8 later this year. That probably has a
lot to do with Tamron's decision. Plus, Pentax is partnered with Tokina on lens
development. I am completely happy with the Pentax lenses. I have no desire for
third party lenses. And with the new lenses that will be
Hi Amita,
Well, I have very little interest in third party lenses so our
interests seem to be at odds. I went from Canon equipment to Pentax
equipment and have been very pleased with the Pentax bodies and
lenses, they've covered all my needs well.
But if you cannot get what you want/need
I think what you have is a general concern that I share. That is, it seems,
that a larger array of new off-the-shelf lenses and accessories is available
for other brands than is available for Pentax. That's of course,
understandable, since the other brands outsell Pentax 10-1 (generalizing
Tamron has a close association with Sony,and did with Minolta as well (A
fair number of later Minolta AF lenses were rebadged Tamron's, including
several of their high-end lenses). Considering that Sony is the current
producer of Minolta AF mount cameras Tamron releasing Alpha mount lenses
is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax is going to be selling a 16/50/2.8 later this year. That probably has
a lot to do with Tamron's decision. Plus, Pentax is partnered with Tokina on
lens development. I am completely happy with the Pentax lenses. I have no
desire for third party lenses. And
'see you' when you get back
Russell
Hi!
Tomorrow with G-d help I'd board the plain and go for a two weeks long
vacation abroad. Thus I shall unsubscribe from the list in few hours
;-).
Hopefully I have what to present for PAWs and PUG...
--
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
A friend is looking for an entry level DSLR, and she likes my istDS. We
talked a little about the DL/DL2 and the new (and now available) K110D and
the K100D. Price is a concern for her, so the non-anti-shake body is where
here interest lies. BuyDig has both the DL and the K110D in stock, and,
I wondered why Pentax even thought announcing another 6MP DSLR was somehow a
good marketing strategy.
Tom C.
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or
numbered.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: PDML
Amita,
Without getting at all specific, something I rarely do, a couple months
back I was reading dpreview Canon chat. Big hairy Canon whine for not
carrying a lens line equivalent to Pentax. All manner of examples were
offered, including the LTD primes.
They were critical of both the choices and
Amita Guha wrote:
I have recently become frustrated by the fact that a couple of
third-party lenses I like are not available in Pentax mount.
Yesterday, I emailed Tamron to ask them if their 17-50 f/2.8 would
someday be available for Pentax, and they said no. When I wrote back
to ask if they
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele
Subject: Re: venting about lack of available 3rd party other lenses
Paul, I suspect the only reason Amita cares about third
party
lenses for Pentax bodies is to save money. 20 years or so
ago there were lots
of _good_ 3rd party ones for
Tom C wrote:
I wondered why Pentax even thought announcing another 6MP DSLR was somehow a
good marketing strategy.
1) It's less expensive than the K100D
2) It doesn't have that stupid ist name ;-)
--
Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
412-687-2835
--
PDML
I think the K110D is much better than the DL on many counts. First, if
the AF is anything like the K100D (which I own), it's *MUCH* better than
what you get on the DL; second, it's much more future proof by being
SDHC compatible. I personally don't think Pentax will ever release a
firmware
I only note one difference, that being the K110D has an 11 pt AF system
whereas the DL has a 3 pt system.
DL 'prox $80 less.
Jack
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A friend is looking for an entry level DSLR, and she likes my istDS.
We
talked a little about the DL/DL2 and the new
Shel -
Both have pentamirrors rather than a pentaprism - as near as I can tell,
the only difference is the the K110 has 11 point autofocus, while the DL
has 3 point, and the K110 will do high speed flash with a dedicated
flash unit and the DL doesn't have this feature.
If money is a factor,
Exactly. I shoot with Pentax because I like Pentax lenses. It has nothing to do
with brand loyalty. That's why I have no serious interest in third party lenses.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
Twenty years ago, Pentax was a company with brand recognition as well.
They let things slide for too long, and now there is an entire
generation of buyers who have never heard of them.
OTOH, if one is interested in cheap 3rd partly lenses instead of the
ones supplied by the manufacturer, it
On 8/10/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A friend is looking for an entry level DSLR, and she likes my istDS. We
talked a little about the DL/DL2 and the new (and now available) K110D and
the K100D. Price is a concern for her, so the non-anti-shake body is where
here interest
Nicley framed and great pose on her. Cat people unite.:-)
Dave
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/longlittlekittybw.jpg
I'm having such fun
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
A friend is looking for an entry level DSLR, and she likes my istDS. We
talked a little about the DL/DL2 and the new (and now available) K110D and
the K100D. Price is a concern for her, so the non-anti-shake body is where
here interest lies.
On Aug 10, 2006, at 3:51 PM, Asad Masede wrote:
they can be forgiven for wanting people to buy their new
cameras while they're in deep financial shit
You mean while they're selling cameras in record numbers and at the
highest profitability for the camera division in the history of the
I would like to move toward digital for a number of
reasons, mostly the ability to take lots of shots
and losing the baddies without wasting film.
But, I've got a ton of old Pentax glass, mostly old
screwmount Takumars, but also some more recent AF
zooms for my ZX-5N.
So I went out today to look
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:51:54 +0100, Asad Masede [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. they can be forgiven for wanting people to buy
their new
cameras while they're in deep financial shit.
-Asad
Pentax are a profit-making company. Saying they are in deep financial
Where does this come from? Profitability defined how?
at the
highest profitability for the camera division in the history of the
company? That kind of shit?
-Aaron
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 04:16:57PM -0400, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Just a though, but IIRC the K1[01]0D does DNG RAW files. Are they
compressed to a non-stupid level? Anyone know?
Neither the K100D nor K110D produce DNG RAW files. The new version of
Pentax Photo Laboratory (SilkyPix in
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 04:25:46PM -0400, chuck wrote:
I would like to move toward digital for a number of
reasons, mostly the ability to take lots of shots
and losing the baddies without wasting film.
But, I've got a ton of old Pentax glass, mostly old
screwmount Takumars, but also some
The only resaon i use Nikon Dslr's is that in 2001, Pentax did not
have anything to even consider.
A Nikon used D1 was made available to me, and i took it. I would be
shooting Canon had the photographer i bought from shot that system
instead of Nikon. It was a matter of supply and demand i
My uncle Dave's Chevy:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/39chevy.jpg
:)
--
Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
412-687-2835
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
For several month I used sRGb as a color model for my *istDL, then brief
noote that AdobeRGB gives greater color reproduction made me find
AdobeRGB.icc profile for ufraw and two pictures take on the same time of
the day, at about same conditions speak for them self:
Adobe RGB
--- John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- AF540FGZ
Probably the best Pentax-compatible flash I've
used. I love the
low-light focus-assist feature! I only wish it had
a strobe-flash mode. I
love that it has different modes for each of
Pentax's camera lines: 35mm,
645, 67, and
I do understand your frustration, but i have two systems and they both
are used for different things.
Might be worth while to have two.
That's kind of what I was thinking. I might feel differently if I
didn't have a Canon body collecting dust at home, but since I have one
at my disposal, I
Mark Roberts wrote:
I think the reciprocal of Nyquist frequency should be dubbed the
Theriault frequency. Surely it plays an important role in
establishing proper blur?
;-)
It's probably the Theriaultian Golden Mean or some such. :-)
(Just wait until Frank gets back from vacation and
Nice.
We have several Black and grey squirrels in out back yard i'v been
trying to get all summer.
One day.
Dave
Quoting Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is all about a cute accident.
At Bryce Canyon, UT, several years back, my wife was 'playing' with a
chipmunk by placing bits of Ritz
On 8/10/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amita,
Without getting at all specific, something I rarely do, a couple months
back I was reading dpreview Canon chat. Big hairy Canon whine for not
carrying a lens line equivalent to Pentax. All manner of examples were
offered, including the
And anyway these software version 3 are vavailable for DS/DL/D also.
2006/8/10, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 04:16:57PM -0400, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Just a though, but IIRC the K1[01]0D does DNG RAW files. Are they
compressed to a non-stupid level? Anyone
John Forbes wrote:
2 Indicative that you are in deep intellectual shit (ie: stupid)
John
Wow, when did I ever insult you? Is venting online the only way you can
cope with your frustration?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Aug 10, 2006, at 3:51 PM, Asad Masede wrote:
they can be forgiven for wanting people to buy their new
cameras while they're in deep financial shit
You mean while they're selling cameras in record numbers and at the
highest profitability for the camera
The screen on the K110D is bigger, brighter, and has a better viewing angle.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: K110D - Why bother?
Date: Thu Aug 10, 2006 3:19 pm
Size: 749 bytes
To: PDML PDML@pdml.net
A friend is looking for an entry level
Profitability defined as money coming in above money spent, 'record' as in they
had a higher total dollar amount profit on cameras than any other month in the
history of the company and followed it up the next month with an even better
month.
As to where, same place I hear everything. ;)
On Aug 9, 2006, at 2:14 PM, Cotty wrote:
Yeah, and he also made a mean cup of tea as well.
I'm glad to have multiple talents. ]'-)
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Aug 10, 2006, at 10:50 AM, Bengt Falke wrote:
In our Canon S3 IS there is a setting for when it is used together
with
a converter in font of the lens so I guess that the in-body anti shake
must know the focal length to be able to calculate the anti shake
compensation.
I suppose new
On Aug 10, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Amita Guha wrote:
... I thought Canon L-glass was comparable
to the Ltd lenses, but maybe not? ...
Seen from a marketing and price positioning perspective, it is.
Whether a specific lens offering in the Canon L line matches or
exceeds the performance of a
Sorry, is this based on something factual or when you say IMO do you mean
that you're just guessing about Pentax's financials?
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Asad Masede [EMAIL PROTECTED]
They've just begun to do that, they have started climbing out of their
hole, yes, but are they
Same size actually, the DL was the first Pentax with the 2.5 screen.
-Adam
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
The screen on the K110D is bigger, brighter, and has a better viewing angle.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: K110D - Why bother?
Date:
Parts commonality. K110D is replacing the DL entirely. Because it can be
made from K100D parts.
-Adam
Tom C wrote:
I wondered why Pentax even thought announcing another 6MP DSLR was somehow a
good marketing strategy.
Tom C.
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed,
Amita wrote:
Has anyone else has made the jump this way?
No. not really. If I wanted third party lenses I would have bought a third
party camera
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I was questioning the wisdom of continuing with any 6MP DSLR body when the
bar has been raised in entry level DSLRs for some time now.
Tom C.
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or
numbered.
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
- Original Message -
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If it works similarly to Minolta, it doesn't need to know lens focal
length to work. I used some old T-Mount lenses on the Minolta 7D and
the IS worked just fine. It even worked with an old Russian mirror lens!
It needs focal
Thanks, Scott ... good to know. I forgot about the Samsung. Might be worth
adding to the discussion with my friend.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Scott Loveless
Have you mentioned the Samsung GX-1S? Looks to be a DS2, more or less.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thank you so much, Paul. Very good and valuable information.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Sorenson
Both have pentamirrors rather than a pentaprism - as near as I can tell,
the only difference is the the K110 has 11 point autofocus, while the DL
has 3 point, and the K110 will do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/9/2006 12:05:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060806183540
Looks like I'll be making more sessions with this model and your comment
to my initial improvisations would be appreciated.
That's what I heard forgot about it, though. tks!
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Aaron Reynolds
The screen on the K110D is [...] brighter, and has a better viewing
angle.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
How so? Please be as specific as you can. Thanks.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Asad Masede
I think the K110D is much better than the DL on many counts. First, if
the AF is anything like the K100D (which I own), it's *MUCH* better than
what you get on the DL;
--
PDML
Thanks, Dave!
Jack
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice.
We have several Black and grey squirrels in out back yard i'v been
trying to get all summer.
One day.
Dave
Quoting Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is all about a cute accident.
At Bryce Canyon, UT,
Amita Guha wrote:
I thought Canon L-glass was comparable to the Ltd lenses, but maybe not?
Canon L-glass is equivalent to the Pentax FA* lenses.
The Pentax Limiteds *can* be made to perform like Canon L lenses -
just smear a light coating of Vaseline on the front element of the Ltd
lens...
:)
On Aug 10, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Tom C wrote:
I was questioning the wisdom of continuing with any 6MP DSLR body
when the
bar has been raised in entry level DSLRs for some time now.
Which bar? Just because 8 and 10 Mpixel cameras are out there at
similar pricing doesn't mean that they do any
Well, I can't (and won't) do any timed tests, but the K100D is much
better at low light AF than the last gen of Pentax DSLRs. I have an *ist
DS and it has trouble locking onto subjects when it's dark, and when it
does lock-on, it's slow; the K100D on the other hand, locks on very
quickly even
- Original Message -
From: Roman
Subject: AdobeRGB vs. sRGB
For several month I used sRGb as a color model for my *istDL, then
brief
noote that AdobeRGB gives greater color reproduction made me find
AdobeRGB.icc profile for ufraw and two pictures take on the same time
of
the
- Original Message -
From: chuck
Subject: Wanting to Move to Digital
I would like to move toward digital for a number of
reasons, mostly the ability to take lots of shots
and losing the baddies without wasting film.
But, I've got a ton of old Pentax glass, mostly old
screwmount
- Original Message -
From: Asad Masede
Subject: Re: K110D - Why bother?
John Forbes wrote:
2 Indicative that you are in deep intellectual shit (ie: stupid)
John
Wow, when did I ever insult you? Is venting online the only way you
can
cope with your frustration?
It's all
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
