On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 08:49:48PM -0400, D Brooks wrote:
Watching an all nighter of CSI Miami, and have noticed something.
They tend to take a LOT of close up photos, Nikon of some sort, but
never use a tripod and their shots turn out -super sharp-.
Maybe i'll get Speed to do my flower
Nikon PS have always been good at Macro and 'Best shot selector' is sorta
the poor mans SR, VR, etc. Have taken lots of sharp hand held macros with
my Nikon 990.
Powell
Watching an all nighter of CSI Miami, and have noticed something.
They tend to take a LOT of close up photos, Nikon of some
I got it! I just thought it was too crap to comment on. Besides, these
pun threads are becoming too predictable. Most of the replies seem
like Pavlova reflexes.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Roberts
Sent: 16
Bob W wrote:
That's a bit rich considering every American male over 45
(and many of
the females) looks like Kenny Rogers!
I once saw Frans Lanting in Mike's eyebrows.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Is that Kenny Rogers before or after the botox???
annsan
who DOESN'T look like
Just got one of these (refurbished grade A stock) for my son - anyone
have one? Any comments?
TIA
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The on-camera pop-up flash will trigger another flash without wires
if the other flash is in slave mode.
In mettered TTL for the slave?
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, P. J. Alling wrote:
Decimal inches seem so rational, and inches are more of a human scale
than millimeters.
Greeks call the centimeter the finger (width thereof). What is the
inch associated with on humans? A 12th of a largish penis? No, make it
a tenth.
Actually, don't
Replacing seals is pretty straight forward with all of the Pentax bodies I've
worked on.
I use the seal kits sold by Jon Goodman (EBay name interslice). The kits
include a good range of different types of seal material and come with
instructions for lots of different cameras.
Cheers
Brian
Tim Øsleby wrote:
I know the man is mean, but is he that mean?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
I couldn't help myself. Sad but true.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
Roberts
Sent: 16. september 2006 03:19
D Brooks wrote:
Watching an all nighter of CSI Miami, and have noticed something.
They tend to take a LOT of close up photos, Nikon of some sort, but
never use a tripod and their shots turn out -super sharp-.
Maybe i'll get Speed to do my flower shots from now on.
I've been after
Bob W wrote:
I got it! I just thought it was too crap to comment on. Besides, these
pun threads are becoming too predictable. Most of the replies seem
like Pavlova reflexes.
--
Cheers,
Bob
8-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
What is the
inch associated with on humans?
The thumb bone which has the nail on - the distal phalange.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kostas Kavoussanakis
Sent: 16 September 2006 09:47
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 16/9/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
I got it! I just thought it was too crap to comment on. Besides, these
pun threads are becoming too predictable. Most of the replies seem
like Pavlova reflexes.
But you must admit a hunger for them.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
On 15/9/06, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Decimal inches seem so rational, and inches are more of a human scale
than millimeters.
I've got 305mm but never use it as a rule.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've also noticed some new look full page Pentax Ads
in several photo mags.
Not just photo mags. Yesterday I was flipping through
National Geographic Traveler and there was a nice
full-page K100D ad. It emphasized small and light
and Shake Reduction
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've also noticed some new look full page Pentax Ads
in several photo mags.
Not just photo mags. Yesterday I was flipping through
National Geographic Traveler and there was a nice
full-page K100D ad. It emphasized small and light
and Shake Reduction
A question:
Is it true that the K10D only offers ISO 100-1600? (no over ride to 3200
like the D)
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Shel
I have owned two Pentax DSLR's: The D and the DL. The latter uses the AE-L
for metering with non A-lenses. The D uses the Green Button.
IMHO the green buton is more convenient (ergonomic) to use than the AE-L on
the back side of the DL.
When using the Green Button it is not necassary to remove
On 9/16/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plastic surgery's great, isn't it? I mean who wouldn't want it?
http://www.hollywoodrag.com/index.php?/celebrity2/category/C194/
I can hardly wait 'til I'm old and ugly...
That's just too easy...
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Why wait? Get it now while you're still young and handsome enough to enjoy
it LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob W
Plastic surgery's great, isn't it? I mean who wouldn't want it?
http://www.hollywoodrag.com/index.php?/celebrity2/category/C194/
I can hardly wait 'til I'm old and
Jens,
I'd like to know that as well. AFAIK, it's never been clarified here.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jens Bladt
A question:
Is it true that the K10D only offers ISO 100-1600?
(no over ride to 3200 like the D)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Bill Robb has one I think.
But he's probably still somewhere in the Rockies or something.
What do you think of it? I've been considering getting a PS for some time now.
Dave
On 9/16/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just got one of these (refurbished grade A stock) for my son - anyone
have
Hi Gang,
Maybe I missed it, but can someone explain why Pentax went from AA's to the
rechargeable LithIons? I've read that the LithIons produce more power than
the AA's and that the camera needs more power, but I also read that such is
not the case, and that AA's can work just as well depending
On 16/9/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Bill Robb has one I think.
But he's probably still somewhere in the Rockies or something.
What do you think of it? I've been considering getting a PS for some
time now.
My lad had a cheapy Powershot A310 from eBay (£39) but he took it on a
True, Pentax has a number of 50mm/1.4 lenses that will work well on the
DSLR's, but I wonder why there's no 50mm DA lens. That seems like a big
hole in the lineup. I'd like to see such a lens - smaller and lighter
perhaps than the FA etc., with that focusing clutch thing, and, of course,
On 16/09/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gang,
Maybe I missed it, but can someone explain why Pentax went from AA's to the
rechargeable LithIons? I've read that the LithIons produce more power than
the AA's and that the camera needs more power, but I also read that such is
Thanks Ken.
I didi crop most of the body to the right. I thought a touch of hand
would help.Don't ask why i thought that.:-)
I thought about cropping to the left. I;ll see how that works
Dave
Quoting Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Great capture Dave.
If it were mine I'd crop the hands
Thanks
Dave
Quoting J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yep, lovely moment well captured.
James
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: Peso Margo's got the cargo
I wish he'd stop dogging us about them. Bob S.
On 9/16/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/9/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
I got it! I just thought it was too crap to comment on. Besides, these
pun threads are becoming too predictable. Most of the replies seem
like Pavlova
Okay, that's why using the popup flash as a slave trigger works in my
studio. I always shoot in manual exposure mode there. And since I
haven't tried it more than once or twice, it may well have been with a
K lens.
Paul
On Sep 15, 2006, at 11:49 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
That only works
Even 25 years ago Cambridge on the decline. By then 47th Street Photo
had proved that you could make money selling at near wholesale prices
if you did it efficiently. Cambridge was already well on its way to
becoming a scam shop when I landed in New York in 1980. Olden was still
hanging on to
No. You have to do it the old fashioned way. But that's the only way I
shoot in my studio or when I use studio strobes on location. With
digital it's not very difficult. You don't even have to do any math.
Guess, shoot and look. Once you know your equipment, it's easy to come
within a stop
I have 12 inches, but I don't use it as a rule.
Paul
On Sep 16, 2006, at 4:46 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, P. J. Alling wrote:
Decimal inches seem so rational, and inches are more of a human scale
than millimeters.
Greeks call the centimeter the finger (width
Sure. But.
These days it seems a Limited means a pancake.
Is that what we want?
Pancakes are cool, but faster primes are what I need.
I sure could use a fast 30mm too, like the Sigma 30 f:1.4
If I have to choose between fast lenses and compact lenses, fast lenses are
what I'd go for.
Tim
On 9/16/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My lad had a cheapy Powershot A310 from eBay (£39) but he took it on a
school trip and put it in his big bag - that went in the coach (bus)
underneath storage compartment and when retrieved, the LCD was cracked
and unreadable. The camera was fine - it
Darn. You beat me:-)
Paul
On Sep 16, 2006, at 5:21 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 15/9/06, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Decimal inches seem so rational, and inches are more of a human scale
than millimeters.
I've got 305mm but never use it as a rule.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
Cotty's is bigger by 0.2mm.
Apparently he has 305mm
Dave
At 08:36 PM 16/09/2006, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I have 12 inches, but I don't use it as a rule.
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Sorry, we all moved and apparently someone forgot to tell you.
Dave
At 08:37 PM 16/09/2006, cbwaters wrote:
still there?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi,
I'm reading Journey to the Centre of the Earth by Richard Nicholas
Crane. It's about an ultralight bicycle ride they made in the mid 80s
from Chittagong in Bangladesh to the point on the earth's surface that
is most remote from the sea in all directions - the centre of the
earth - just north
still there?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 9/16/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plastic surgery's great, isn't it? I mean who wouldn't want it?
http://www.hollywoodrag.com/index.php?/celebrity2/category/C194/
I can hardly wait 'til I'm old and ugly...
That's just too easy...
Dave
:o)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Quoting Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Guess what? They took a Pentax MX and 3 lenses: 28, 50 and 120mm.
No film.??
Dave
--
Cheers,
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Equine Photography in York Region
--
PDML
On 9/16/06, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Guess what? They took a Pentax MX and 3 lenses: 28, 50 and 120mm.
No film.??
That's why it lasted so long.
They never actually used it.
Dave ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi,
Guess what? They took a Pentax MX and 3 lenses: 28, 50 and 120mm.
No film.??
They thought it was digital.
Actually, they shot Kodachrome 64 and Tri-X. 22 rolls altogether.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
The small 70mm f2.8? shown on the new K10D photos has me thinking.
It is a pancake size lens.
Perhaps Pentax feels it can seriously change lens design with shake reduction.
Maybe they think we don't need the fast/big glass any longer.
Regards, Bob S.
On 9/16/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Sep 16, 2006, at 3:53 AM, Cotty wrote:
... Even then, these
LCDs are so vulnerable. Anyone make a really robust camera with a
way of
protecting the LCD? ...
How about a case for the camera? I keep my Fuji F30 in a cell phone
case... doesn't add much to its size, is quick and easy to
On 15/09/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the D70 was around 90,000/month and I'd expect the D80 is similar.
The XTi is probably a little more. No idea on the Sonolta.
I don't know where these numbers came from but if true makes
interesting reading.
On 17/09/06, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The small 70mm f2.8? shown on the new K10D photos has me thinking.
It is a pancake size lens.
Perhaps Pentax feels it can seriously change lens design with shake reduction.
Maybe they think we don't need the fast/big glass any longer.
I don't
http://roman.blakout.net/?year=2006s=0category=actionsportblog=20060916163949
but guys do and if sky is so blue, shooting em flying high above the
roofs of medieval old town is almost a must. Your feedback welcome.
One.
--
home http://roman.blakout.net/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
David Savage wrote:
Cotty's is bigger by 0.2mm.
Apparently he has 305mm
Dave
At 08:36 PM 16/09/2006, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I have 12 inches, but I don't use it as a rule.
Paul
I knew a girl who had a foot fetish ... but she'd settle for seven or
eight inches.
--
Thanks,
DougF
I don't see that they'd be able to make a 50mm f/1.4-1.2 lens much
smaller than the current FA50/1.4 and it is a great performer. It
would be much more to my liking if they released the same optics in a
D-FA lens mount. A compact, pancake DA50/2.8 Limited might be neat,
but I'd rather they
I would rather see a 60mm DA lens. If it's to be 50, then it should be a D
FA so that it is compatible with analogue cameras like my MZ-S.
Mike.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Shel
Belinkoff
Sent: September 16, 2006 3:20 AM
To: PDML
SR will never stop a moving subject.
Moving subjects is main reason for my lust for fast glass.
On the other hand, if Pentax came up with a Moving Subject Stopper, MSS...
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unless you have the handstrap on it, where you can't quite reach it on
the D. But it was a better location and design than the D's AE lock
button, which I never could find without looking. I will agree that the
location is better than on the DS/DL.
So far I'm really liking the K100D's AE lock
The material indicates that, but as teh firmware isn't settled and test
items are known to have from 50-3200 rather than the advertised
100-1600, this may (and hopefully will) change before release. 3200 is
quite useful in a pinch and I had missed it with my D50.
-Adam
Jens Bladt wrote:
A
On Sep 15, 2006, at 11:02 PM, David Savage wrote:
I've seen a few eposodes where they take pictures holding the D/SLR
out at arms length like a PS composing with the LCD.
Well, they are actors after all, not photographers.
Ur, um, well all but one of them are actors.
Bob
--
PDML
At f2.4, the 70 is about perfect for me. Essentially the same length and
speed as the legendary Nikon 105 f2.5, which is a superb portrait lens.
-Adam
Bob Sullivan wrote:
The small 70mm f2.8? shown on the new K10D photos has me thinking.
It is a pancake size lens.
Perhaps Pentax feels it
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
True, Pentax has a number of 50mm/1.4 lenses that will work well on the
DSLR's, but I wonder why there's no 50mm DA lens. That seems like a big
hole in the lineup. I'd like to see such a lens - smaller and lighter
perhaps than the FA etc., with that focusing clutch
I didn't know that. I thought Ltd meant/implied higher quality optics, not
particularly pancake format.
A 31/1.8 wouldn't work for you?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Tim Øsleby
Sure. But.
These days it seems a Limited means a pancake.
Is that what we want?
Pancakes are cool, but
I don't think we need _big_ glass, but faster glass is always beneficial.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob Sullivan
The small 70mm f2.8? shown on the new K10D photos has
me thinking. It is a pancake size lens.
Perhaps Pentax feels it can seriously change lens design with
shake
On 9/16/06 10:23 AM, Digital Image Studio, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know where these numbers came from but if true makes
interesting reading.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=20055021
There was exactly the kind of info you were looking for in Japan when
Why couldn't they make a smaller 50/1.4?
Yes, a nice, fast 28 would be wonderful, and a 35/1.4 would be a kick as
well.
Jumping to a 50/2.8 would seem like a real step backwards for any number of
reasons.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
I don't see that they'd be able to
Talk like what, Rob? Do you mean the more ready acceptance of slower
lenses? I think we've seen that dumbing down with the prevalence of
slower, variable aperture zooms.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Digital Image Studio
The small 70mm f2.8? shown on the new K10D
photos has me
Haven't they done something like that with the PS cameras - Pet mode and
child mode?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Tim Øsleby
On the other hand, if Pentax came up with a
Moving Subject Stopper, MSS...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 9/16/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SR will never stop a moving subject.
Moving subjects is main reason for my lust for fast glass.
On the other hand, if Pentax came up with a Moving Subject Stopper, MSS...
Wrong company.
Winchester or Remington come to mind. Though Pentax could
There's is a huge hole in the line up for lenses above 100mm.
Though I guess this was because they were waiting to implement SSM.
Dave
On 9/16/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would seem redundant as there's already F/FA 50mm lenses, and making a
DFA would require a larger
That would seem redundant as there's already F/FA 50mm lenses, and making a
DFA would require a larger lens than just a DA, right? I'd accept a 60mm
DA ... what I really think is that there's a hole in the current lineup
that's equivalent to, or approximates, the standard portrait lens - 75mm -
Because you need a 35.7mm diameter front element for a 50mm f1.4, or a
41.6mm front element for a 50mm f1.2. The Pentax FA 50mm f1.4 is already
about the smallest on the market, at it's size, I'd suspect the size of
the optics necessary for the speed are more of a limiting factor than
the
You are getting more DOF with the 70mm though.. it would be nice if it
was faster to make up for this.
-R
Adam Maas wrote:
At f2.4, the 70 is about perfect for me. Essentially the same length and
speed as the legendary Nikon 105 f2.5, which is a superb portrait lens.
-Adam
Bob Sullivan
I only said that Limited _seems_ to mean pancake.
Looking at the new DA Limiteds, they are all pancakes. But this does not
mean that this has to be the case in future.
I don't know for a fact that a 31 f:1,8 wouldn't do. I've never tried it.
But I have shot with a Vivitar 28 f:2. Without SR
Settling disturbances with guns ain't my style.
Flash is the obvious solution. But I dislike destroying the natural the
light. And using flash at a concerts is a party killer.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
True.
-Adam
Ryan Brooks wrote:
You are getting more DOF with the 70mm though.. it would be nice if it
was faster to make up for this.
-R
Adam Maas wrote:
At f2.4, the 70 is about perfect for me. Essentially the same length and
speed as the legendary Nikon 105 f2.5, which is a superb
You didn't!? Didn't Boris bring his when he came to visit?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Tim Øsleby
I don't know for a fact that a 31 f:1,8 wouldn't do. I've never tried it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I'm not sure that's correct ... I'll have to check the diameter of my Leica
glass. It seems to me that the lenses for my Leica, compared to the same
focal length/aperture of my Pentax glass, are smaller.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Adam Maas
Because you need a 35.7mm diameter front
Yes, I think concern regarding a shortage is quite legitimate. I
guess that's part of a being a small fish in a big pond.
Paul
On Sep 16, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 15/09/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the D70 was around 90,000/month and I'd expect the
It's obviously not the case. Witness the new fast DA zooms. We're
going to see a lot more than consumer lenses from Pentax. I think a
fast 50 will eventually make the lineup, although for now Pentax
probably figures they have that niche pretty well covered with the DA
40.2.8 and the FA
Some good shots. What's going on here? Are they jumping from roof to
roof? Not my idea of fun.
Paul
On Sep 16, 2006, at 10:27 AM, Roman wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/?
year=2006s=0category=actionsportblog=20060916163949
but guys do and if sky is so blue, shooting em flying high above the
Shel, They are, because they have a far simpler aperture design. No
aperture coupling or full-aperture mechanism is required for an RF lens,
not to mention a smaller-diameter mount (which allows smaller-diameter
barrels). But even so, fast RF glass isn't all that much smaller than a
Pentax
Faster + bigger. We also need big glass in the sense of long
lenses. SSM 400 and 600 mm lenses will probably appear some day.
Paul
On Sep 16, 2006, at 11:25 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I don't think we need _big_ glass, but faster glass is always
beneficial.
Shel
[Original Message]
I'd like to see a 50mm 1.4 Limited in the DA series. I
would prefer that to the 40 2.8 pancake.
Of course, since I'm old fashioned, I'd like it to be
an FA-DA with an aperture ring...but I could live
without it...maybe.
How about this: Instead of a 50mm, how about bringing
back the 55mm f1.8?(in
LOL.
Tom, Adam Rob received an ear bashing were labeled negative a
couple of days ago for saying that.
I guess we can add Paul to the list of negative naysayers.
Dave ;-)
On 9/17/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I think concern regarding a shortage is quite legitimate. I
Dear all,
when I had to buy a compact digital camera, I looked at the cameras
in the range of 7 megapixels like Olympus C7000, Canon G6 and S70 and
of course -since I am a Pentaxist (MX, MZ-5n and various K lenses)-
the Pentax Optio 750Z.
I decided to go for the Pentax only because I was
My *ist D has caught a huge fungus today:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/24451/
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Pancho
Hasselbach
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I process some RAW files for one of my colleagues. The ISO 800 pics
from her Canon 20D are noticeably more noisy than the 800ISO pics
from my *istD. However, I too expect the 10D to be better than both.
Paul
I own(ed) both an *ist D and a 20D and processed 1000s of
Great shot.
-Adam
Jens Bladt wrote:
My *ist D has caught a huge fungus today:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/24451/
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A completely Pentax PESO from me for the first time in a long time.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/244670476/
Or for non-Flickrites (And larger)
http://static.flickr.com/98/244670476_9452ca7abf_b.jpg
K100D, SMC-M 50mm f2 wide open at 1/100. ISO 400 and SR on.
-Adam
--
PDML
Christian wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I process some RAW files for one of my colleagues. The ISO 800 pics
from her Canon 20D are noticeably more noisy than the 800ISO pics
from my *istD. However, I too expect the 10D to be better than both.
Paul
I own(ed) both an *ist D and a 20D and
Fortunately, I get better looking every year (I was a really ugly
child), so I do not need that stuff. Now if they would just come up with
something that would reverse my brain turning into mush.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof ==
Tim Øsleby wrote:
On Behalf Of Bob Sullivan
The small 70mm f2.8? shown on the new K10D photos has me thinking.
It is a pancake size lens.
Perhaps Pentax feels it can seriously change lens design with shake
reduction.
Maybe they think we don't need the fast/big glass any longer.
SR will never
Ryan Brooks wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
At f2.4, the 70 is about perfect for me. Essentially the same length and
speed as the legendary Nikon 105 f2.5, which is a superb portrait lens.
You are getting more DOF with the 70mm though.
Not true. Not at the same subject magnification, anyway. (And
Boris had it with him, off course.
I think he brings it along wherever he goes. At night I saw him down by the
water fumbling with it, whispering my precious. I really had trouble
falling to sleep, thinking about the things the man is going thru.
He is a brave little creature, so he generously
On 16/9/06, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
A 50mm f1.2 D-FA Limited would be a dream lens. Especially if it came
out for less money than the Canon 50 f1.2L.
You mean the 50mm f/1 ?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Rethink that, Adam. You need center elements bigger than that. The front
element has to be larger still. The aperture openings are the size you
state. And since they outlawed the use of stuff like thorium glass, the
elements have to be larger than they did in older lenses (that is one of
the
But a really good rangefinder would.
tiny grin
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Mark Roberts wrote:
A bright viewfinder in dark shooting conditions - before sunrise or
after
Yes, Adam.ISO 3200 is still quite usefull.
These are all ISO 3200 shots:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594264219819/
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Saw this K100D coffee wrapper ads posted by Betsy at dpreview:
http://www.pbase.com/betsypdx/image/66871602.jpg
Very imaginative and memorable :-)
--
--Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vex.net/~lawrence --
--Tungsten T3 Enhanced DIA KeyboardNokia Ringtone Convertor--
--
PDML
Cotty wrote:
On 16/9/06, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
A 50mm f1.2 D-FA Limited would be a dream lens. Especially if it came
out for less money than the Canon 50 f1.2L.
You mean the 50mm f/1 ?
No, he means the 50mm f/1.2
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082415canon50f12lens.asp
On 16/9/06, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
[excellent precis snipped]
I'm sure there are other aspects that I like and don't like, but it's
early, last night's beer has worn off, and this morning's coffee
hasn't kicked in.
Thanks Scott, really appreciate that. Just what I wanted
On 16/9/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
You mean the 50mm f/1 ?
No, he means the 50mm f/1.2
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082415canon50f12lens.asp
D'oh. Yep, forgot that was introduced recently, along with a 70-200/4 IS IIRC.
Daaah. 5o mil lenses, waste of bloody time !
1 - 100 of 313 matches
Mail list logo
